Changes in toxicity and Ah receptor agonist activity of suspended particulate matter during flood events at the rivers Neckar and Rhine — a mass balance approach using in vitro methods and chemical analysis

  • Jan Wölz
  • Magnus Engwall
  • Sibylle Maletz
  • Helena Olsman Takner
  • Bert van Bavel
  • Ulrike Kammann
  • Martin Klempt
  • Roland Weber
  • Thomas Braunbeck
  • Henner Hollert
DIOXIN AND POP-CONTAMINATED SITES • CHALLENGES • SERIES • RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

As a consequence of flood events, runoff and remobilized sediments may cause an increase of ecotoxicologically relevant effects from contaminant reservoirs. Aquatic and terrestrial organisms as well as cattle and areas of settlement are exposed to dislocated contaminants during and after flood events. In this study, the impacts of two flood events triggered by intense rain at the rivers Neckar and Rhine (Southern Germany) were studied. Effects in correlation to flood flow were assessed at the river Neckar using samples collected at frequent intervals. River Rhine suspended particulate matter (SPM) was sampled over a longer period at normal flow and during a flood event. Three cell lines (H4L1.1c4, GPC.2D.Luc, RTL-W1) were used to compare Ah receptor agonist activity in different biotest systems. Multilayer fractionation was performed to identify causative compounds, focusing on persistent organic contaminants.

Materials and methods

Native water and SPM of flood events were collected at the river Neckar and at the monitoring station (Rheinguetestation, Worms, Germany) of the river Rhine. Water samples were XAD-extracted. SPM were freeze-dried and Soxhlet-extracted using acetone and finally dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. Resulting crude extracts were analyzed for cytotoxicity with the neutral red assay. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist activity was measured in a set of biological test systems (DR-CALUX, GPC.2D, and ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) assay) and different cell lines. In addition, crude extracts were fractionated using a combined method of multilayer (sequence of acidified silica layers) and carbon fractionation. Fractions from the multilayer fractionation contained persistent organic compounds (polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs)); fractions from the carbon fractionation were separated into a PCDD/F and a PCB fraction. Dioxin-like activity of multilayer and carbon fractions was determined in the EROD assay and expressed as biological toxicity equivalency concentrations of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (bio-TEQs). The calculation of chemical equivalency concentrations (chem-TEQs) and comparison to bio-TEQ values allowed the determination of the contribution of the analyzed persistent compounds to the total biological effects measured.

Results

Soluble compounds in native and extracted water samples resulted in no or minor activity in the toxicity tests, respectively. Filter residues of native water caused increased AhR-mediated activity at the peak of the flood. Activities of SPM of the river Neckar correlated well with the flow rate indicating a flood-dependent increase of toxicity culminating at the peak of flow. River Rhine SPM showed a decrease of activity regarding an SPM sample of the flood event compared to a long-term sample. Excellent correlations with AhR agonistic activity were determined for DR-CALUX and EROD assay, while the GPC.2D assay did not correlate with both other biotests. The activity of persistent dioxin-like acting compounds in multilayer and carbon fractionated PCDD/F and PCB fractions was low if compared to corresponding crude extracts. The congener pattern of PCDD/F revealed that the contaminations mainly originated from products and productions of the chlorine and organochlorine industries.

Discussion

Native and extracted water samples could be shown to contain little or no cytotoxic or AhR agonistic compounds. In contrast, particle-bound compounds were shown to be the relevant effect-causing fraction, as indicated by the activities of filter residues of native water and SPM. Compounds other than fractionated persistent PCBs and PCDD/Fs were more relevant to explain AhR-mediated activities of crude flood SPM at both rivers assessed. Biologically detected activities could at least in part be traced back to chemically analyzed and quantified compounds.

Conclusions

The calculation of the portion of persistent PCBs and PCDD/Fs in multilayer fractions causing the high inductions in the EROD assay in combination with chemical analysis provides a suitable tool to assess dioxin-like activity of persistent compounds in SPM sampled over the course of flood events. Depending on the catchment area and annual course of flood events, end points may either indicate an increase or a decrease of activity. In order to determine the ecological hazard potential of mobilized contaminants during flood events, the focus should be set on particle-bound pollutants. Furthermore, PCDD/Fs and PCBs, commonly expected to be the most relevant pollutants in river systems, could be shown to contribute only to a minor portion of the overall AhR-mediated activity. However, they might be most relevant for human exposure when considering persistence and bioaccumulation–biomagnification in the food chain.

Recommendations and perspectives

As a consequence of climate change, flood events will increase in frequency and intensity at least in some regions such as Central Europe. Thus, it is crucial to identify the potential hazard of (re-)mobilized contaminants from reservoirs dislocated via floods and threatening especially aquatic organisms and cattle grazing in flood plains. Since other less persistent compounds seem to be more relevant to explain AhR-mediated activities in flood SPM, nonconventional PAHs and more polar compounds also need to be considered for risk assessment. Effect-directed analysis using broad-range fractionation methods taking into account compounds from polar to nonpolar should be applied for identification of pollutants causing biological effects, thus integrating biological and chemical parameters.

Keywords

AhR Cytotoxicity Dioxin-like activity DR-CALUX EROD Flood event GPC.2D Multilayer fractionation Sediment Suspended particulate matter Remobilization 

References

  1. Aarts J, Denison M, Cox M, Schalk M, Garrison P, Tullis K, de Haan L, Brouwer A (1995) Species-specific antagonism of Ah receptor action by 2,2’,5,5’-tetrachloro- and 2,2’,3,3’,4,4’-hexachlorobiphenyl. Eur J Pharm Environ Tox 293:463–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babich H, Borenfreund E (1992) Neutral red assay for toxicology in vitro. In: Watson RR (ed) In vitro methods of toxicology. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 237–251Google Scholar
  3. Babut M, Oen A, Hollert H, Apitz S, Heise S (2007) Prioritization at river basin scale, risk assessment at site-specific scale: suggested approaches, Chapter 4. In: Heise S (ed) Sustainable management of sediment resources. Volume 3—Sediment risk management & communication. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 107–152Google Scholar
  4. Behrens A, Schirmer K, Bols NC, Segner H (1998) Microassay for rapid measurement of 7-ethoxyresorufin-o-deethylase activity in intact fish hepatocytes. Mar Environ Res 46:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brack W, Segner H, Möder M, Schüürmann G (2000) Fixed-effect-level toxicity equivalents—a suitable parameter for assessing ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase induction potency in complex environmental samples. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2493–2501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brack W, Altenburger R, Dorusch F, Hubert A, Moeder M, Morgenstern P, Moschuetz S, Mothes S, Schirmer K, Wennrich R, Wenzel K-D, Schueuermann G (2002) Flood 2002: chemical and toxical burden of flooded areas in the region of Bitterfeld, Germany. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 14:213–220Google Scholar
  7. Brack W, Schirmer K, Erdinger L, Hollert H (2005) Effect-directed analysis of mutagens and ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase inducers in aquatic sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:2445–2458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brack W, Klamer HJ, Lopez de Alda M, Barcelo D (2007) Effect-directed analysis of key toxicants in European river basins a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman PM, Hollert H (2006) Should the sediment quality triad become a tetrad, a pentad, or possibly even a hexad? J Soils Sediments 6:4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen G, Bunce NJ (2004) Interaction between halogenated aromatic compounds in the Ah receptor signal transduction pathway. Environ Toxicol 19:480–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clemons J, Dixon D, Bols N (1997) Derivation of 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxic equivalent factors (TEFs) for selected dioxins, furans and PCBs with rainbow trout and rat liver cell lines and the influence of exposure time. Chemosphere 35:1105–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cracknell AP, Varotsos CA (2007) The IPCC fourth assessment report and the fiftieth anniversary of Sputnik. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14:384–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Disse M, Engel H (2001) Flood events in the Rhine Basin: genesis, influences and mitigation. Natural Hazards 23:271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eadon G, Kaminsky L, Silkworth J, Aldous K, Hilker D, O’Keefe P, Smith R, Gierthy J, Hawley J, Kim N (1986) Calculation of 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent concentrations of complex environmental contaminant mixtures. Environ Health Perspect 70:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Einsporn S, Broeg K, Koehler A (2005) The Elbe flood 2002-toxic effects of transported contaminants in flatfish and mussels of the Wadden Sea. Marine Pollut Bull 50:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engwall M, Broman D, Ishaq R, Näf C, Zebühr Y, Brunström B (1996) Toxic potencies of lipophilic extracts from sediments and settling particulate matter (SPM) collected in a PCB contaminated river system. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erickson RJ, McKim JM, Lien GJ, Hoffman AD, Batterman SL (2006a) Uptake and elimination of ionizable organic chemicals at fish gills: II. Observed and predicted effects of ph, alkalinity, and chemical properties. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1522–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erickson RJ, McKim JM, Lien GJ, Hoffman AD, Batterman SL (2006b) Uptake and elimination of ionizable organic chemicals at fish gills: I. Model formulation, parameterization, and behavior. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1512–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foerstner U (2007) Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) applicable to sediment and/or biota. J Soils Sediments 7:270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garrison PM, Tullis K, Aarts J, Brouwer A, Giesy JP, Denison MS (1996) Species-specific recombinant cell lines as bioassay systems for the detection of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-like chemicals. Fund Appl Toxicol 30:194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gasiewicz TA, Kende AS, Rucci G, Whitney B, Willey JJ (1996) Analysis of structural requirements for Ah receptor antagonist activity: ellipticines, flavones, and related compounds. Biochem Pharmacol 52:1787–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerbersdorf SU, Jancke T, Westrich B (2007) Sediment properties for assessing the erosion risk of contaminated riverine sites. J Soils Sediments 7:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerhardt A (2007) Importance of exposure route for behavioural responses in Lumbriculus variegatus Muller (Oligochaeta: Lumbriculida) in short-term exposures to Pb. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14:430–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Götz R, Steiner B, Friesel P, Roch K, Walkow F, Maasz V, Reincke H, Stachel B (1998) Dioxin (PCDD/F) in the river Elbe—investigations of their origin by multivariate statistical methods. Chemosphere 37:1987–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Götz R, Bauer OH, Friesel P, Herrmann T, Jantzen E, Kutzke M, Lauer R, Paepke O, Roch K, Rohweder U, Schwartz R, Sievers S, Stachel B (2007) Vertical profile of PCDD/Fs, dioxin-like PCBs, other PCBs, PAHs, chlorobenzenes, DDX, HCHs, organotin compounds and chlorinated ethers in dated sediment/soil cores from flood-plains of the river Elbe, Germany. Chemosphere 67:592–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gustavsson LK, Klee N, Olsman H, Hollert H, Engwall M (2004) Fate of Ah receptor agonists during biological treatment of an industrial sludge containing explosives and pharmaceutical residues. Environ Sci Pollut Res 11:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gustavsson L, Hollert H, Jansson S, Bavel B, Engwall M (2007) Reed beds receiving industrial sludge containing nitroaromatic compounds. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14:202–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haag I, Kern U, Westrich B (2001) Erosion investigation and sediment quality measurements for a comprehensive risk assessment of contaminated aquatic sediments. Sci Tot Environ 266:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Habe H, Chung J-S, Lee J-H, Kasuga K, Yoshida T, Nojiri H, Omori T (2001) Degradation of chlorinated dibenzofurans and dibenzo-p-dioxins by two types of bacteria having angular dioxygenases with different features. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3610–3617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heinisch E, Kettrup A, Bergheim W, Wenzel S (2004) Persistent chlorinated hydrocarbons (PCHC), source-oriented monitoring in aquatic media. 1. Methods of data processing and evaluation. Fresenius Environ Bull 13:1461–1473Google Scholar
  31. Heinisch E, Kettrup A, Bergheim W, Wenzel S (2007) Persistent chlorinated hydrocarbons (PCHCs), source-oriented monitoring in aquatic media. 6. Strikingly high contaminated sites. Fres Environ Bull 16:1248–1273Google Scholar
  32. Heise S, Foerstner U (2006) Risks from historical contaminated sediments in the Rhine basin. Water Air Soil Pollut 6:625–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heise S, Westrich B, Salomons W, Schoeneberger H, Foerstner U (2004) Inventory of historical contaminated sediment in Rhine basin and its tributaries. Technical University Hamburg Harburg and University Stuttgart, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  34. Hilscherova K, Dusek L, Kubik V, Hofman J, Cupr P, Klánová J, Holoubek I (2007) Redistribution of organic pollutants in river sediments and alluvial soils related to major floods. J Soils Sediments 7:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hofmann T, Wendelborn A (2007) Colloid facilitated transport of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) to the groundwater at Ma Da area, Vietnam. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14:223–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hollert H, Dürr M, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T (2000) Cytotoxicity of settling particulate matter (SPM) and sediments of the Neckar river (Germany) during a winter flood. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hollert H, Dürr M, Olsman H, Halldin K, Bavel Bv, Brack W, Tysklind M, Engwall M, Braunbeck T (2002) Biological and chemical determination of dioxin-like compounds in sediments by means of a sediment triad approach in the catchment area of the Neckar River. Ecotoxicology 11:323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hollert H, Haag I, Dürr M, Wetterauer B, Holtey-Weber R, Kern U, Westrich B, Färber H, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T (2003a) Investigations of the ecotoxicological hazard potential and risk of erosion of contaminated sediments in lock-regulated rivers. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 15:5–12Google Scholar
  39. Hollert H, Keiter S, Koenig N, Rudolf M, Ulrich M, Braunbeck T (2003b) A new sediment contact assay to assess particle-bound pollutants using zebra fish (Danio rerio) embryos. J Soils Sediments 3:197–207Google Scholar
  40. Hollert H, Duerr M, Holtey-Weber R, Islinger M, Brack W, Farber H, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T (2005) Endocrine disruption of water and sediment extracts in a non-radioactive dot blot/RNAse protection-assay using isolated hepatocytes of rainbow trout. Environ Sci Pollut Res 12:347–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hollert H, Duerr M, Haag I, Wölz J, Hilscherova K, Blaha L, Gerbersdorf S (2007a) Influence of hydrodynamics on sediment ecotoxicity. In: Westrich B, Foerstner U (eds) Sediment hydraulics and pollutant mobility in rivers. Springer, Berlin, pp 401–416Google Scholar
  42. Hollert H, Heise S, Keiter S, Heininger P, Förstner U (2007b) Wasserrahmenrichtlinie—Fortschritt und Defizite (Water framework directive—progress and deficiencies). Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 19:58–70Google Scholar
  43. Hulme M (2003) Abrupt climate change: can society cope? Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 361:2001–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ikeda T, Yoshitani J, Terakawa A (2005) Flood management under climatic variability and its future perspective in Japan. Water Sci Technol 51:133–140Google Scholar
  45. Kay AL, Jones RG, Reynard NS (2006a) RCM rainfall for UK flood frequency estimation. II. Climate change results. J Hydrol 318:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kay AL, Reynard NS, Jones RG (2006b) RCM rainfall for UK flood frequency estimation, I, method and validation. J Hydrol 318:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Keiter S, Rarstall A, Kosmehl T, Wurm K, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T, Hollert H (2006) Ecotoxicological assessment of sediment, suspended matter and water samples in the upper Danube river. Environ Sci Pollut Res 13:308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Keiter S, Grund S, Van Bavel B, Hagberg J, Engwall M, Kammann U, Klempt M, Manz W, Olsman H, Braunbeck T, Hollert H (2008) Activities and identification of aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists in sediments from the Danube river. Anal Bioanal Chem 390:2009–2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kennedy S, Jones S (1994) Simultaneous measurement of cytochrome P4501A catalytic activity and total protein concentration with a fluorescence plate reader. Anal Biochem 222:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Klee N, Gustavsson LK, Kosmehl T, Engwall M, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T, Hollert H (2004) Changes in toxicity and genotoxicity of industrial sewage sludge samples containing nitro- and amino-aromatic compounds following treatment in bioreactors with different oxygen regimes. Environ Sci Poll Res 11:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Klinck J, Dunbar M, Brown S, Nichols J, Winter A, Hughes C, Playle RC (2005) Influence of water chemistry and natural organic matter on active and passive uptake of inorganic mercury by gills of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat Toxicol 72:161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kosmehl T, Krebs F, Manz W, Braunbeck T, Hollert H (2007) Differentiation between bioavailable and total hazard potential of sediment-induced DNA fragmentation as measured by the comet assay with zebra fish embryos. J Soils Sediments 7:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee LE, Clemons JH, Bechtel DG, Caldwell SJ, Han KB, Pasitschniak-Arts M, Mosser D, Bols NC (1993) Development and characterization of a rainbow trout liver cell line expressing cytochrome p450-dependent monooxygenase activity. Cell Biol Toxicol 9:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lick W, McNeil J (2001) Effects of sediment bulk properties on erosion rates. Sci Tot Environ 266:46–48Google Scholar
  55. Lorenzen A, Kennedy S (1993) A fluorescence-based protein assay for use with a microplate reader. Anal Biochem 214:346–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maier M, Kuehlers D, Brauch H-J, Fleig M, Maier D, Jirka GH, Mohrlock U, Bethge E, Bernhart HH, Lehmann B, Hillebrand G, Wölz J, Hollert H (2006) Flood retention and drinking water supply—preventing conflicts of interest. J Soils Sediments 6:113–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Murk AJ, Legler J, Denison MS, Giesy JP, Van De Guchte C, Brouwer A (1996) Chemical-activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX): a novel in vitro bioassay for Ah receptor active compounds in sediments and pore water. Fundam Appl Toxicol 33:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. NATO/CCMS (North Atlantic Treaty Organization/Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society) (1998) Pilot study on internal information exchange on dioxins and related compounds. International toxicity equivalency factor (I-TEF), method of risk assessment for complex mixtures of dioxins and related compounds. Report no. 176, 26 ppGoogle Scholar
  59. Netzband A et al (2007) Report on the SedNet round table discussion. Sediment management: an essential element of river basis management plans. J Soils Sediments 7:117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Olsman H, Engwall M, Kammann U, Klempt M, Otte J, Bavel B, Hollert H (2007) Relative differences in aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated response for 18 polybrominated and mixed halogenated dibenzo-p-dioxins and -furans in cell lines from four different species. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:2448–2454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pawlowski S, Ternes T, Bonerz M, Kluczka T, van der Burg B, Nau H, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T (2003) Combined in situ and in vitro assessment of the estrogenic activity of sewage and surface water samples. Toxicol Sci 75:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Peters AK, Sanderson JT, Bergman A, van den Berg M (2006) Antagonism of TCDD-induced ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylation activity by polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in primary cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) hepatocytes. Toxicol Lett 164:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rao S, Kwan K, Dukta B (1990) Toxicity associated with fluvial suspended particulates. Ger J Appl Zool 78:78Google Scholar
  64. Safe SH (1990) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and related compounds: environmental and mechanistic considerations which support the development of toxic equivalency factors (TEFs). Crit Rev Toxicol 21:51–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Safe SH (1994) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) environmental impact, biochemical and toxic responses, and implications for risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 24:87–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schwartz R, Gerth J, Neumann-Hensel H, Bley S, Forstner U (2006) Assessment of highly polluted fluvisol in the Spittelwasser floodplain—based on national guideline values and MNA-criteria. J Soils Sediments 6:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Seiler T-B, Rastall AC, Leist E, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T, Hollert H (2006) Membrane dialysis extraction (MDE) A novel approach for extracting toxicologically relevant hydrophobic organic compounds from soils and sediments for assessment in biotests. J Soils Sediments 6:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Senior CA, Jones RG, Lowe JA, Durman CF, Hudson D (2002) Predictions of extreme precipitation and sea-level rise under climate change. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 360:1301–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stronkhorst J, Leonards P, Murk AJ (2002) Using the dioxin receptor-CALUX in vitro bioassay to screen marine harbor sediments for compounds with a dioxin-like mode of action. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:2552–2561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Umlauf G, Bidoglioa G, Christopha EH, Kampheus J, Landmann D, Schulz AJ, Schwartze R, Severinf K, Stachel B, Stehr D (2005) The situation of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs after the flooding of River Elbe and Mulde in 2002. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 33:543–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van den Berg M, Birnbaum L, Bosveld A, Brunstrom B, Cook P, Feeley M, Giesy J, Hanberg A, Hasegawa R, Kennedy S, Kubiak T, Larsen J, van Leeuwen F, Liem A, Nolt C, Peterson R, Poellinger L, Safe S, Schrenk D, Tillitt D, Tysklind M, Younes M, Waern F, Zacharewski T (1998) Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife, EROD. Environ Health Perspect 106:775–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weber R, Gaus C, Tysklind M (2008a) Dioxin—contemporary and future challenges of historical legacies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15:96–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weber R, Gaus C, Tysklind M, Johnston P, Forter M, Hollert H, Heinisch E, Holoubek I, Lloyd-Smith M, Masunaga S, Moccarelli P, Santillo D, Seike N, Symons R, Torres J, Verta M, Varbelow G, Vijgen J, Watson A, Costner P, Wölz J, Wycisk P, Zennegg M (2008b) Dioxin- and POP-contaminated sites—contemporary and future relevance and challenges. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15:363–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Westrich B, Foerstner U (2005) Sediment dynamics and pollutant mobility in rivers (SEDYMO) Assessing catchment-wide emission–immission relationships from sediment studies. BMBF coordinated research project SEDYMO (2002–2006). J Soils Sediments 5:197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilby RL, Orr HG, Hedger M, Forrow D, Blackmore M (2006) Risks posed by climate change to the delivery of Water Framework Directive objectives in the UK. Environ Int 32:1043–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wilken M, Walkow F, Jager E, Zeschmar-Lahl B (1994) Flooding area and sediment contamination of the river Mulde (Germany) with PCDD/F and other organic pollutants. Chemosphere 29:2237–2252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Windal I, Denison MS, Birnbaum LS, Van Wouwe N, Baeyens W, Goeyens L (2005) Chemically activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX) cell bioassay analysis for the estimation of dioxin-like activity: critical parameters of the CALUX procedure that impact assay results. Environ Sci Technol 39:7357–7364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Witt O, Westrich B (2003) Quantification of erosion rates for undisturbed contaminated cohesive sediment cores by image analysis. Hydrobiologia 494:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wittig R, Konig K, Schmidt M, Szarzynski J (2007) A study of climate change and anthropogenic impacts in West Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14:182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wojahn M (2007) Wissenschaftliche Begleituntersuchung zu den Möglichkeiten der Grünlandnutzung der Überschwemmungsbereiche der Elbe durch die beiden Produktionsverfahren Mutterkuhhaltung und Schafhaltung. In: Landwirtschaftskammer Niedersachsen BU (ed). http://www.elbtalaue.de/index.htm?baum_id=6425&inhalt_id=557302
  81. Wolf K, Quimby M (1962) Established eurythermic line of fish cells in vitro. Science 135:1065–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wölz J, Brack W, Moehlenkamp C, Claus E, Braunbeck T, Hollert H (2008a) Identification of dioxin-like activity in suspended particulate matter of floods using effect-directed analysis. ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
  83. Wölz J, Roger S, Brinkmann M, Cofalla C, Hudjetz S, Kamman U, Hecker M, Schüttrumpf H, Hollert H (2008b) In search for the ecological and toxicological relevance of sediment re-mobilisation during flood events – The joint Research Project FLOODSEARCH. J Soils Sediments, in pressGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhou J, Henry E, Palermo C, Dertinger S, Gasiewicz T (2003) Species specific transcriptional activity of synthetic flavonoids in guinea pig and mouse cells as a result of differential activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor to interact with dioxin responsive elements. Mol Pharmacol 63:915–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Wölz
    • 1
    • 5
  • Magnus Engwall
    • 2
  • Sibylle Maletz
    • 1
    • 5
  • Helena Olsman Takner
    • 2
  • Bert van Bavel
    • 2
  • Ulrike Kammann
    • 3
  • Martin Klempt
    • 4
  • Roland Weber
    • 2
    • 6
  • Thomas Braunbeck
    • 5
  • Henner Hollert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecosystem Analysis, Institute for Environmental Research (Biology V)RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Man-Technology-Environment Research Centre (MTM), Department of Natural ScienceUniversity of ÖrebroÖrebroSweden
  3. 3.Institute for Fishery Ecology, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forests, and FisheriesJohann Heinrich von Thuenen-Institute (vTI)HamburgGermany
  4. 4.Department of Safety and Quality of Milk and Fish Products, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and FoodMax-Rubner-Institute (MRI)KielGermany
  5. 5.Department of Zoology, Aquatic Toxicology and Ecology SectionUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  6. 6.POPs Environmental ConsultingGöppingenGermany

Personalised recommendations