Advertisement

Improving the provision of ecosystem services from urban forest by integrating the species’ potential environmental functions in tree selecting process

  • Vahid Amini ParsaEmail author
  • Esmail Salehi
  • Ahmadreza Yavari
Original Paper
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the fact that urban environments and population demands are evolving rapidly and species selection is inevitable, it is possible to gain substantial environmental benefit by implementing more effective urban tree planting programs, especially with the aim of increasing the upcoming provision of multiple ecosystem services (ES) through proper species selection. In this paper, we used a new approach to improve the potential of urban trees in optimizing more desirable environmental benefits. This was done by selecting the most appropriate tree species among a vast range of species based on their potential environmental function (both services and disservices) in Tabriz city, Iran. Also, three main planting scenarios (divided to six sub-scenarios) were developed so as to understand the long-term effectiveness of introducing the selected tree species in improving the environmental benefits (both urban forest structure and ES) in comparison with planting the existing tree species. The results indicate that regardless of the quantity of planting, the benefits of introducing the selected trees will be more than planting the existing species. Moreover, as the amount of the annual planting of the recommended species increases, so does the improvement in the projected tree characteristics and ES. This approach creates more opportunities which enable urban forest managers and policymakers to understand the importance of selecting the proper urban tree species when looking for a nature-based solution to promote the wellbeing of the urban population, to create more livable and ecologically sustainable cities and to mitigate urban environmental problems.

Article highlights

  • Setting out a new approach to select the proper urban tree species by integrating the species potential environmental functions (ecosystem services and disservices)

  • We analyzed the effectiveness of introducing the recommend species on the upcoming amount of multiple ES and disservices and also tree traits through scenario developing

  • Introducing tree species with high potential in generating ES into urban context can lead to significant improvement both in structural traits of urban tree and environmental benefits.

  • As the relative frequency of the recommended species increase, the provision of ES and also structural characteristics of trees improve.

  • Our approach creates opportunities for considering the importance of planting appropriate species in urban green infrastructure policymaking and also integrate ES concept in urban planning strategies.

Keywords

Urban forestry Ecosystem services approach Environmental benefits Disservices Scenario planning Evaluation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank Dr. David Nowak from USDA Forest Service for his invaluable support and advice, and the i-Tree tools team, especially Dr. Jason Henning for his technical assistance. We further gratefully give our warmest regards to Mr. Babak Chalabiani for his valuable help during the field survey. We also thank all the scientific colleagues for completing the questionnaire.

References

  1. Ahari AS, Sattarzadeh D (2018) Quality of life and attitudes towards third place in the different social setting in Tabriz, Iran. Arman Archit Urban Dev 11:25–38Google Scholar
  2. Alavipanah S, Haase D, Lakes T, Qureshi S (2017) Integrating the third dimension into the concept of urban ecosystem services: a review. Ecol Indic 72:374–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E et al (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53:1169–1179.  https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amini Parsa V, Salehi E, Yavari AR, Van BPM (2019) An improved method for assessing mismatches between supply and demand in urban regulating ecosystem services: a case study in Tabriz, Iran. PLoS ONE 14:e0220750.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220750 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Appleton B, Koci J, Harris R (2000) Trees for problem landscape sites—air pollution. Virginia Cooperative Extension and Virginia Tech University Publication number 430-022, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  6. Armson D, Stringer P, Ennos AR (2013) The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK. Urban For Urban Green 12:282–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Artmann M, Bastian O, Grunewald K (2017) Using the concepts of green infrastructure and ecosystem services to specify leitbilder for compact and green cities—the example of the landscape plan of Dresden (Germany). Sustain 9:198.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asgarzadeh M, Vahdati K, Lotfi M et al (2014) Plant selection method for urban landscapes of semi-arid cities (a case study of Tehran). Urban For Urban Green 13:450–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azarafza M, Ghazifard A (2016) Urban geology of Tabriz City: environmental and geological constraints. Adv Environ Res 5:95–108.  https://doi.org/10.12989/aer.2016.5.2.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baró F, Chaparro L, Gómez-Baggethun E et al (2014) Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain. Ambio 43:466–479.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Beck HW, Gilman EF, Fowler PA (1994) An expert system for tree selection in urban forestry. Appl Eng Agric 10:743–747.  https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Behrens FM-L (2011) Selecting public street and park trees for urban environments: the role of ecological and biogeographical criteria. Lincoln University, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  13. Bennett EM, Cramer W, Begossi A et al (2015) Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:76–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bodnaruk EW, Kroll CN, Yang Y et al (2017) Where to plant urban trees? A spatially explicit methodology to explore ecosystem service tradeoffs. Landsc Urban Plan 157:457–467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29:293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Breuste J, Rahimi A (2015) Many public urban parks, but who profits from them? The example of Tabriz. Iran. Ecol Process 4:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-014-0027-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Calfapietra C, Peñuelas J, Niinemets Ü (2015) Urban plant physiology: adaptation-mitigation strategies under permanent stress. Trends Plant Sci 20:72–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.11.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cariñanos P, Calaza-Martínez P, O’Brien L, Calfapietra C (2017) The cost of greening: disservices of urban trees. In: Pearlmutter D, Calfapietra C, Samson R, et al. (eds) The urban forest, cultivating green infrastructure for people and the environment. Springer, Cham, pp 79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carreiro MM, Song Y-C, Wu J (2007) Ecology, planning, and management of urban forests international perspectives. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Carreiro MM, Zipperer WC (2007) Urban forestry and the eco-city: today and tomorrow. In: Carreiro MM, Song Y-C, Wu J (eds) Ecology, planning, and management of urban forests. Springer, New York, pp 435–456Google Scholar
  21. Chang J, Qu Z, Xu R et al (2017) Assessing the ecosystem services provided by urban green spaces along urban center-edge gradients. Sci Rep 7:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11559-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Colding J (2007) ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plan 81:46–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Connop S, Vandergert P, Eisenberg B et al (2015) Renaturing cities using a regionally-focused biodiversity-led multifunctional benefits approach to urban green infrastructure. Environ Sci Policy 62:99–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davies HJ, Doick KJ, Hudson MD, Schreckenberg K (2017) Challenges for tree officers to enhance the provision of regulating ecosystem services from urban forests. Environ Res 156:97–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L et al (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Sario M, Katsouyanni K, Michelozzi P (2013) Climate change, extreme weather events, air pollution and respiratory health in Europe. Eur Respir J 42:826–843.  https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00074712 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Delshammar T, Östberg J, Öxell C (2015) Urban trees and ecosystem disservices—a pilot study using complaints records from three Swedish cities. Arbor Urban For 41:187–193Google Scholar
  28. Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Zipperer WC (2011) A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landsc Urban Plan 99:196–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dobbs C, Kendal D, Nitschke CR (2014) Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecol Indic 43:44–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Duvernoy G (1995) Forest, keeping it green: political and administrative issues in the preservation of the urban. In: Gordon B (ed) Urban forest landscapes: integrating multidisciplinary perspectives. University of Washington Press, Washington, pp 78–87Google Scholar
  31. Eigenbrod F, Bell VA, Davies HN et al (2011) The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:3201–3208.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Elmore AJ, Kaushal SS (2008) Disappearing headwaters: patterns of stream burial due to urbanization. Front Ecol Environ 6:308–312.  https://doi.org/10.1890/070101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Elmqvist T, Setälä H, Handel SN et al (2015) Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:101–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Endreny TA (2018) Strategically growing the urban forest will improve our world. Nat Commun 9:10–12.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03622-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Enescu CM (2017) The role of tree-of-heaven in forest land reclamation : a brief review. J Hortic For Biotechnol 18:66–69Google Scholar
  36. Escobedo FJ, Giannico V, Jim CY et al (2018) Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban For Urban Green 37:3–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Escobedo FJ, Nowak DJ (2009) Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. Landsc Urban Plan 90:102–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gaertner M, Wilson JRU, Cadotte MW et al (2017) Non-native species in urban environments : patterns, processes, impacts and challenges. Biol Invasions 19:3461–3469.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1598-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gerhold HD, Porter W (2007) Selecting trees for community landscapes. In: Kuser JE (ed) Handbook of urban and community forestry in the northeast, 2nd edn. Springer, Boston, pp 153–168Google Scholar
  40. Gerhold HD, Sacksteder CJ (1982) Better ways of selecting trees for urban plantings. J Arboric 8:145–153Google Scholar
  41. Gholampour A, Nabizadeh R, Hassanvand MS, Faridi S (2016) Characterization of particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban and suburban sites of Tabriz, Iran. J Air Pollut Heal 1:181–190Google Scholar
  42. Giedych R, Maksymiuk G (2017) Specific features of parks and their impact on regulation and cultural ecosystem services provision in Warsaw, Poland. Sustain 9:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gregory McPherson E (1992) Accounting for benefits and costs of urban greenspace. Landsc Urban Plan 22:41–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(92)90006-L CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grunewald K, Bastian O (2017) Maintaining ecosystem services to support urban needs. Sustainability 9:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haase D, Frantzeskaki N, Elmqvist T (2014a) Ecosystem services in urban landscapes: practical applications and governance implications. Ambio 43:407–412.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0503-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Haase D, Larondelle N, Andersson E et al (2014b) A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43:413–433.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Halpern BS, Klein CJ, Brown CJ et al (2013) Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs among social equity, economic return, and conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:6229–6234.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217689110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hilde T, Paterson R (2014) Integrating ecosystem services analysis into scenario planning practice: Accounting for street tree benefits with i-Tree valuation in Central Texas. J Environ Manage 146:524–534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.039 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. i-Tree Eco International Projects (2016) Eco Guide to International ProjectsGoogle Scholar
  50. i-Tree Eco User’s Manual (2016) i-Tree Eco User’s manualGoogle Scholar
  51. i-Tree Field Guide (2016) i-Tree Eco Field GuideGoogle Scholar
  52. i-Tree Forecast Model (2016) Eco guide to using the forecast modelGoogle Scholar
  53. i-Tree Species (2018a) How to Use i-Tree Species. https://species.itreetools.org/help/. Accessed 27 Oct 2018
  54. i-Tree Species (2018b) References—i-Tree Species. https://species.itreetools.org/references/. Accessed 27 Oct 2018
  55. Jim CY (2007) Opportunities and alternatives for enhancing urban forests in compact cities in developing countries. Ecology, planning, and management of urban forests. Springer, New York, pp 118–148Google Scholar
  56. Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (2005) Urban forests and trees, a reference book. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (2004) Urban forests and trees, a reference book. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  58. Kremer P, Hamstead Z, Haase D et al (2016) Key insights for the future of urban ecosystem services research. Ecol Soc 21:29.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08445-210229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kulshrestha U, Saxena P (eds) (2016) Plant responses to air pollution. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  60. Lemonsu A, Viguié V, Daniel M, Masson V (2015) Vulnerability to heat waves: impact of urban expansion scenarios on urban heat island and heat stress in Paris (France). Urban Clim 14:586–605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2015.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Li YY, Wang XR, Huang CL (2011) Key street tree species selection in urban areas. Afr J Agric Res 6:3539–3550.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.461 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Livesley SJ, McPherson GM, Calfapietra C (2016) The urban forest and ecosystem services: impacts on urban water, heat, and pollution cycles at the tree, street, and city scale. J Environ Qual 45:119.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Lyytimäki J, Sipilä M (2009) Hopping on one leg—the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For Urban Green 8:309–315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Martínez del Castillo E, Longares LA, Serrano-Notivoli R, de Luis M (2019) Modeling tree-growth: assessing climate suitability of temperate forests growing in Moncayo Natural Park (Spain). For Ecol Manage.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McDonald R, Kroeger T, Boucher T et al (2016) Planting healthy air: a global analysis of the role of urban trees in addressing particulate matter pollution and extreme heat. The nature conservancyGoogle Scholar
  66. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McPherson EG, Simpson JR (1999) Carbon dioxide reductions through urban forestry: guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  69. Mikaeeili A, Sadeghe M (2011) Urban ecological network of Tabriz city and proposed solutions for preservation and development. Environ Res 1:43–52Google Scholar
  70. Miller RW, Hauer RJ, Werner LP (2015) Urban forestry: planning and managing urban greenspace, 3rd edn. Waveland Press Inc, Long GroveGoogle Scholar
  71. Moore M, Gould P, Keary BS (2003) Global urbanization and impact on health. Int J Hyg Environ Health 206:269–278.  https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00223 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Morgenroth J, Östberg J, Konijnendijk van den Bosch C et al (2016) Urban tree diversity-taking stock and looking ahead. Urban For Urban Green 15:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Newman P, Jennings I (2008) Cities as sustainable ecosystems, principles and practice. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  74. Nielsen AB, van den Bosch M, Maruthaveeran S, van den Bosch CK (2014) Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosyst 17:305–327.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Niemelä J (1999) Ecology and urban planning. Biodivers Conserv 8:119–131.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008817325994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nowak DJ (1996) Estimating leaf area and leaf biomass of open-grown deciduous urban trees. For Sci 42:504–507Google Scholar
  77. Nowak DJ (2008) Species Selector Application, Tools for assessing and managing Community Forests. i-Tree, USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  78. Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC (2006) Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban For Urban Green 4:115–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Walton JT et al (2002) Understanding and quantifying urban forest structure, functions and value. In: Proc Fifth Can Urban For Conf, pp 7–9Google Scholar
  80. Nowak DJ, Hirabayashi S, Bodine A, Greenfield E (2014) Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environ Pollut 193:119–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.05.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Nowak DJ, Hoehn RE, Bodine AR et al (2016) Urban forest structure, ecosystem services and change in Syracuse, NY. Urban Ecosyst 19:1455–1477.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0326-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ogren TL (2000) Allergy-free gardening: the revolutionary guide to healthy landscaping. Ten Speed PressGoogle Scholar
  83. Parsa VA, Salehi E, Yavari AR, Bodegomb PM van (2018a) Evaluating the possible contribution of urban ecosystem service to mitigate climate change. Urban Ecosyst (under review) Google Scholar
  84. Parsa VA, Salehi E, Yavaria AR, Bodegomb PM van (2018b) Analyzing plausible temporal changes in urban forest structure and the effect on air quality improvement. Sustain Cities Soc (under review) Google Scholar
  85. Pataki DE, Carreiro MM, Cherrier J et al (2011) Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions. Front Ecol Environ 9:27–36.  https://doi.org/10.1890/090220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pauleit S (2003) Urban street tree plantings: identifying the key requirements. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Municipal Engineer. Thomas Telford Ltd, pp 43–50Google Scholar
  87. Phillips LE (1993) Urban trees: a guide for selection, maintenance and master planning. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  88. Pincetl S, Gillespie T, Pataki DE et al (2013) Urban tree planting programs, function or fashion? Los Angeles and urban tree planting campaigns. GeoJournal 78:475–493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-012-9446-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rahimi A (2014) Modeling of Tabriz expansion in 2031 using land transformation model. Biannu J Urban Ecol Res 5:99–110Google Scholar
  90. Raymond CM, Frantzeskaki N, Kabisch N et al (2017) A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environ Sci Policy 77:15–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Richards NA (1993) Reasonable guidelines for street tree diversity. J Arboric 19:344–350Google Scholar
  92. Roy S, Byrne J, Pickering C (2012) A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban For Urban Green 11:351–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Roy S, Davison A, Östberg J (2017) Pragmatic factors outweigh ecosystem service goals in street tree selection and planting in South-East Queensland cities. Urban For Urban Green 21:166–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sæbø A, Benedikz T, Randrup TB (2003) Selection of trees for urban forestry in the Nordic countries. Urban For Urban Green 2:101–114.  https://doi.org/10.1078/1618-8667-00027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Seppelt R, Manceur AM, Liu J et al (2014) Synchronized peak-rate years of global resources use. Ecol Soc 19:50.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07039-190450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Shirani-bidabadi N, Nasrabadi T, Faryadi S et al (2019) Evaluating the spatial distribution and the Intensity of urban heat island using remote sensing, Case study of Isfahan city in Iran. Sustain Cities Soc 45:686–692.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sjöman H, Gunnarsson A, Pauleit S, Bothmer R (2012) Selection approach of Urban Trees for inner-city environments: learning from nature. Arboric Urban For 38:194–204Google Scholar
  98. Sladonja B, Poljuha D, Uzelac M et al (2018) Non-native invasive species as ecosystem service providers. In: Hufnagel L (ed) Ecosystem services and global ecology. Intechopen, London, pp 39–59Google Scholar
  99. Statistical Center of Iran (2016) Population and housing censuses, censuses 2016. https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Population-and-Housing-Censuses. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
  100. Teimouri R, Yigitcanlar T (2018) An approach towards effective ecological planning: quantitative analysis of urban green space characteristics. Glob J Environ Sci Manag 4:195–206.  https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2018.04.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Thomas K, Geller L (2013) Urban forestry: toward an ecosystem services research agenda: a workshop summary. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  102. Tomas AS, Zelimir B, Slycken L, Van J (2005) The Selection of plant materials for street trees, park trees and urban woodland. In: Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (eds) Urban forests and trees. Springer, Berlin, pp 257–280Google Scholar
  103. Trowbridge P, Bassuk NL (2004) Trees in the urban landscape: site assessment, design, and installation. Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  104. UN DESA (2018) 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospect. In: Popul. Div. United Nations Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff. (UN DESA). https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2018
  105. Vogt J, Gillner S, Hofmann M et al (2017) Citree: a database supporting tree selection for urban areas in temperate climate. Landsc Urban Plan 157:14–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wang HF, Qureshi S, Knapp S et al (2015) A basic assessment of residential plant diversity and its ecosystem services and disservices in Beijing, China. Appl Geogr 64:121–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Weather Spark (2109) Average Weather at Tabriz Synoptic Station, Iran. https://weatherspark.com/y/148823/Average-Weather-at-Tabriz-International-Airport-Iran-Year-Round#Sections-BestTime. Accessed 25 May 2019
  108. Wei H, Huang Z, Lin M (2017) A decision support system for plant optimization in urban areas with diversified solar radiation. Sustain 9:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Woodall CW, Nowak DJ, Liknes GC, Westfall JA (2010) Assessing the potential for urban trees to facilitate forest tree migration in the eastern United States. For Ecol Manage.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Yang J, McBride J, Zhou J, Sun Z (2004) The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban For Urban Green 3:65–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2004.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Yli-Pelkonen V, Niemelä J (2005) Linking ecological and social systems in cities: urban planning in Finland as a case. Biodivers Conserv 14:1947–1967.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-2124-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Young RF (2011) Planting the living city: Best practices in planning green infrastructure—results from major U.S. cities. J Am Plan Assoc 77:368–381.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.616996 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Young RF (2013) Mainstreaming urban ecosystem services: a national survey of municipal foresters. Urban Ecosyst 16:703–722.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0287-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Young RF (2010) Managing municipal green space for ecosystem services. Urban For Urban Green 9:313–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Zarghami M, Akbariyeh S (2012) System dynamics modeling for complex urban water systems: application to the city of Tabriz, Iran. Resour Conserv Recycl 60:99–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Zavaleta ES, Pasari JR, Hulvey KB, Tilman GD (2010) Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. In: PNAS; proceedings of the national academy of sciences, pp 1443–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environment, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations