Advertisement

Landscape and Ecological Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 223–230 | Cite as

Influences of plant spacing on root tensile strength of Schefflera arboricola and soil shear strength

  • J. J. NiEmail author
  • A. K. Leung
  • C. W. W. Ng
Short Communication
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Mechanical root reinforcement depends not only on root biomechanical properties but also on root biomass. Although it is known that plant spacing can affect root growth, it is not clear how it affects root tensile strength. We interpreted a set of field data to study the effects of spacing of Schefflera arboricola on root area ratio (RAR), root tensile strength and their combined effects on soil shear strength (also termed root cohesion). S. arboricola was transplanted into compacted silty sand at a spacing of 0.5 m, 0.8 m and 1.1 m. After 20 months of growth in the field, the root systems were excavated for root tensile testing and post-test trait measurements. Plant spacing affected the growth and tensile strength of roots. More closely spaced plants had higher RAR but lower root tensile strength, especially for roots 0.5–2 mm in diameter. According to the existing root breakage and fibre bundle models used in this study, which calculate root cohesion as the product of RAR and root tensile strength, the effects of plant spacing on root cohesion were minimal for most soil depths apart from 0.4- to 0.5-m depth.

Keywords

Vegetation Mechanical contribution Root cohesion Field test Modelling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China for a research grant (no. 51778166). A. K. L. (the second author) acknowledges the award of an EU Marie Curie Career Integration Grant for the BioEPIC slope project.

References

  1. ASTM (2010a) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). American Society for Testing and Materials, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM (2010b) Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. American Society for Testing and Materials, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  3. Barij N, Stokes A, Bogaard T, van Beek R (2007) Does growing on a slope affect tree xylem structure and water relations? Tree Physiol 27:757–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bengough AG, Mullins CE (1990) Mechanical impedance to root growth—a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. J Soil Sci 41(3):341–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bischetti GB, Chiaradia EA, Simonato T, Speziali B, Vitali B, Vullo P, Zocco A (2005) Root strength and root area ratio of forest species in Lombardy (Northern Italy). Plant Soil 278:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blume-Werry G, Lindén E, Andresen L, Classen AT, Sanders NJ, Von Oppen J, Sundqvist MK (2018) Proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation belowground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra. J Veg Sci 29(2):226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boldrin D, Leung AK, Bengough AG (2017a) Root biomechanical properties during establishment of woody perennials. Ecol Eng 109(B):196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boldrin D, Leung AK, Bengough AG (2017b) Correlating hydrologic reinforcement of vegetated soil with plant traits during establishment of woody perennials. Plant Soil 1:1.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3211-3 Google Scholar
  9. Brisson J, Reynolds JF (1994) The effect of neighbors on root distribution in a creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) population. Ecology 75:1693–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casper BB, Jackson RB (1997) Plant competition underground. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:545–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiatante D, Sarnataro M, Fusco S, Di Iorio A, Scippa GS (2003) Modification of root morphological parameters and root architecture in seedlings of Fraxinus ornus L. and Spartium junceum L. growing on slopes. Plant Biosyst 137:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darawsheh MK, Khah EM, Aivalakis G, Chachalis D, Sallaku F (2009) Cotton row spacing and plant density cropping systems. I. Effects on accumulation and partitioning of dry mass and LAI. J Food Agric Environ 7(3–4):258–261Google Scholar
  13. De Baets S, Poesen J, Reubens B, Wemans K, De Baerdemaeker J, Muys B (2008) Root tensile strength and root distribution of typical Mediterranean plant species and their contribution to soil shear strength. Plant Soil 305:207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di IA, Lasserre B, Scippa GS, Chiatante D (2005) Root system architecture of Quercus pubescens trees growing on different sloping conditions. Ann Bot 95(2):351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ekanayake JC, Phillips CJ (2002) Slope stability thresholds for vegetated hillslopes: a composite model. Can Geotech J 39:849–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fan CC, Su CF (2008) Role of roots in the shear strength of root-reinforced soils with high moisture content. Ecol Eng 33:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Genet M, Stokes A, Salin F, Mickovski SB, Fourcaud T, Dumail JF, van Beek R (2005) The influence of cellulose content on tensile strength in tree roots. Plant Soil 278:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. GEO (Geotechnical Engineering Office) (2011) Technical guidelines on landscape treatment for slopes. Geotechnical Engineering Office, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  19. Giupponi L, Bischetti GB, Giorgi A (2017) A proposal for assessing the success of soil bioengineering work by analysing vegetation: results of two case studies in the Italian Alps. Landsc Ecol Eng 13(2):305–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gray DH, Sotir RB (1996) Biotechnical and soil bioengineering slope stabilization: a practical guide for erosion control. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Hales TC, Ford CR, Hwang T, Vose JM, Band LE (2009) Topographic and ecologic controls on root reinforcement. J Geophys Res 114:1–17Google Scholar
  22. Jiang WS, Wang KJ, Wu QP, Dong ST, Liu P, Zhan JW (2013) Effects of narrow plant spacing on root distribution and physiological nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize. Crop J 1(1):77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jotisankasa A, Taworn D (2016) Direct shear testing of clayey sand reinforced with live stake. Geotech Test J ASTM 39(4):608–623Google Scholar
  24. Loades KW, Bengough AG, Bransby MF, Hallett PD (2010) Planting density influence on fibrous root reinforcement of soils. Ecol Eng 36:276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loades KW, Bengough AG, Bransby MF, Hallett PD (2015) Effect of root age on the biomechanics of seminal and nodal roots of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in contrasting soil environments. Plant Soil 395(1–2):253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mao Z, Bourrier F, Stokes A, Fourcaud T (2014) Three-dimensional modelling of slope stability in heterogeneous montane forest ecosystems. Ecol Eng 273:11–22Google Scholar
  27. McCormack LM, Dickie IA, Eissenstat DM, Fahey TJ, Fernandez CW, Guo D, Helmisaari H, Hobbie EA, Iversen CM, Jackson RB, Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Norby RJ, Phillips RP, Pregitzer KS, Pritchard SG, Rewald B, Zadworny M (2015) Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol 207:505–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior, vol 3. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Moser G, Leuschner C, Roderstein M, Graefe S, Soethe N, Hertel D (2010) Biomass and productivity of fine and coarse roots in five tropical mountain forests stands along an altitudinal transect in southern Ecuador. Plant Ecol Divers 3(2):151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Munns R, Sharp RE (1993) Involvement of abscisic acid in controlling plant growth in soil of low water potential. Aust J Plant Physiol 20(5):425–437Google Scholar
  31. Ng CWW, Ni JJ, Leung AK, Zhou C, Wang ZJ (2016) Effects of planting density on tree growth and induced soil suction. Géotechnique 66(9):711–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ng CWW, Leung AK, Ni JJ (2019) Plant–soil slope interaction. Taylor & Francis, USA. ISBN 978-1-13-819755-8 (in press) Google Scholar
  33. Ni JJ, Leung AK, Ng CWW, So PS (2017) Investigation of plant growth and transpiration-induced suction under mixed grass-tree conditions. Can Geotech J 54(4):561–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pollen N, Simon A (2005) Estimating the mechanical effects of riparian vegetation on stream bank stability using a fiber bundle model. Water Resour Res 41:W07025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Preti F, Schwarz M (2006) On root reinforcement modelling. Geophysical Research Abstracts, vol 8. EGU General Assembly 2006, 2–7 April. ISSN: 1029–7006Google Scholar
  36. Raich JW, Russell AE, Valverde-Brrantes O (2009) Fine root decay rates vary widely among lowland tropical tree species. Oecologia 161:325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rubio G, Walk T, Ge ZY, Yan XL, Liao H, Lynch JP (2001) Root gravitropism and below-ground competition among neighbouring plants: a modelling approach. Ann Bot 88:929–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwarz M, Lehmann P, Or D (2010) Quantifying lateral root reinforcement in steep slopes—from a bundle of roots to tree stands. Earth Surf Process Land 35(3):354–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tanaka N, Yagisawa J (2009) Effects of tree characteristics and substrate condition on critical breaking moment of trees due to heavy flooding. Landsc Ecol Eng 5(1):59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu TH, McKinnell WP, Swanston DN (1979) Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Can Geotech J 16(1):19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringThe Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations