Advertisement

Landscape and Ecological Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 75–90 | Cite as

Future land use/cover changes in Romania: regional simulations based on CLUE-S model and CORINE land cover database

  • Gheorghe Kucsicsa
  • Elena-Ana PopoviciEmail author
  • Dan Bălteanu
  • Ines Grigorescu
  • Monica Dumitraşcu
  • Bianca Mitrică
Original Paper
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

Since 1990, a series of fundamental political and socioeconomic transformations in Romania have led to important structural and functional changes in the land use/cover system. This paper aims to assess the past land use/cover dynamics during the period 1990–2006 and to simulate future changes (2007–2050) to identify the main land use/cover change processes and their potential environmental and land management implications. The simulation was carried out using the Conversion of Land Use and its Effects at Small regional extent (CLUE-S) model with the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) database and several biophysical and socioeconomic explanatory variables associated with the current land use/cover pattern. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method and cross-classification maps, statistical and spatial validation was assessed to evaluate the performance of the predicted data. The predicted map could represent a useful tool for monitoring and quantifying spatial and temporal land use/cover changes at national and particularly regional level, in order to adopt appropriate land use planning and environmental policy in line with sustainable development principles. In addition, the results could be used for further analyses to examine the consequences of land use/cover changes on landscape diversity and biodiversity, the interaction between land use/cover changes and natural hazards, or the implications for ecosystem services.

Keywords

CLC database CLUE-S model Land use/cover change Romania 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The current results are part of the RO-RISK Project (Disaster Risk Assessment at national level—SIPOCA 30) carried out under the Administrative Capacity Operational Programme and the grants “Geographical research of the Romanian Danube Valley” and “Environmental Atlas of Romania—Landslides risk assessment”—fundamental studies under the research plan of the Institute of Geography, Romanian Academy. The authors would like to thank the IVM Institute for Environmental Studies (http://www.ivm.vu.nl/en/Organisation/departments/spatial-analysis-decision-support/Clue) for its support of the full CLUE software version and the European Environment Agency (Copernicus Land Monitoring Service of the European Union) for the provision of the land use/cover database (http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/COR0-landcover).

References

  1. Ahmed B, Ahmed R, Zhu X (2013) Evaluation of model validation techniques in land cover dynamics. SPRS Int J Geo-Inf 2:577–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bălteanu D, Popovici EA (2010) Land use changes and land degradation in post-socialist Romania. Rev Roumaine de Géogr/Romanian J Geogr 54(2):95–105Google Scholar
  3. Bălteanu D, Dumitraşcu M, Ciupitu D, Geacu S (2006) Protected natural areas. In: Bălteanu D, Badea L, Buza M, Niculescu G, Popescu C, Dumitrașcu M (eds) Romania: space, society, environment. The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy, pp 328–339Google Scholar
  4. Bălteanu D, Chendeș V, Sima M, Enciu P (2010) A country-wide spatial assessment of landslide susceptibility in Romania. Geomorphology 124(3–4):102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Popescu CI (2016) Industria României—de la dezidustrializare la reindustrializare. In: Bălteanu D, Dumitraşcu M, Geacu S, Mitrică B, Sima M (eds) România. Natură şi societate. Editura Academiei Române, Bucharest, pp 375–404Google Scholar
  6. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scale. Educ Psychol Measur 20:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dams J, Woldeamlak ST, Batelaan O (2008) Predicting land-use change and its impact on the groundwater system of the Kleine Nete catchment. Belgium Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12(6):1369–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dincă L, Niță MD, Hofgaard A, Alados CL, Broll G, Borz SA, Wertz B, Monteiro AT (2017) Forests dynamics in the montane-alpine boundary: a comparative study using satellite imagery and climate data. Clim Res 73:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dumitraşcu M, Bălteanu D, Kucsicsa G, Popovici EA (2016) Land use/cover changes in selected protected areas in Romania. 33rd international geographical congress “Shaping our Harmonious Worlds”, August 21–25, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  10. Feranec J, Jaffrain G, Soukup T, Hazeu G (2010) Determining changes and flows in European landscapes 1990–2000 using CORINE land cover data. Appl Geogr 30:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feranec J, Soukup T, Taff GN, Stych P, Bicik I (2017) Overview of changes in land use and land cover in Eastern Europe. In: Gutman G, Radeloff V (eds) Land-cover an land-use changes in Eastern Europe after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, vol. VIII, Springer, Switzerland, pp 13–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42638-9_2
  12. Fischer M, Rudmann-Maurer K, Weyand A, Stöcklin J (2008) Agricultural land use and biodiversity in the Alps. Mt Res Dev 28:148–155.  https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.0964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gehrig-Fasel J, Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2007) Tree line shifts in the European Alps: climate change or land abandonment? J Veg Sci 18:571–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. General Inspectorate for Emergency Situations (2016) Country report 5.1: conditionality Romania 2016. https://www.igsu.ro/documente/RO–RISK/Raport_Final_de_tara.pdf
  15. Glade T (2003) Landslide occurrence as a response to land use change: a review of evidence from New Zealand. Catena 51:297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grădinaru S, Iojă CI, Onose A, Gavrilidis AA, Pătru-Stupariu I, Kienast F, Hersperger A (2015) Land abandonment as a precursor of built-up development at the sprawling periphery of former socialist cities. Ecol Indic 57:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grigorescu I, Kucsicsa G, Mitrică B (2015) Assessing spatio-temporal dynamics of urban sprawl in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area over the last century. In: Bičík I, Himiyama Y, Feranec J, Kupková L (eds) Land use/cover changes in selected regions in the World, vol. XI. IGU–LUCC research reports, International Geographical Union Commission on Land Use/Cover Change, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, pp 19–28Google Scholar
  18. Guan D, Li H, Inohae T, Su W, Nagaie T, Hokao K (2011) Modeling urban land use change by the integration of cellular automaton and Markov model. Ecol Model 222:3761–3772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haines-Young R, Weber JL (2006) Land accounts for Europe 1990–2000. Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, p 107Google Scholar
  20. Halmy MW, Gessler PE, Hicke JA, Salem BB (2015) Land use/land cover change detection and prediction in the north-western coastal desert of Egypt using Markov-CA. Appl Geogr 63:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanganu J, Constantinescu A (2015) Land cover changes in Romania based on Corine land cover inventory 1990–2012. Rev Roum Géogr/Rom Journ Geogr 59(2):111–116Google Scholar
  22. IGBP, IHDP (1999) Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) implementation strategy. In: Nunes C, Augé JI (eds) A core project of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme and the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, IGBP report no. 48/IHDP report no 10. Scientific Steering Committee and International Project Office of LUCC, International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme, International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP). https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc12005/m2/1/high_res_d/report-48.pdf
  23. Ioras F, Abrudan I, Dautbasic M, Avdibegovic M, Gurean D, Ratnasingam J (2009) Conservation gains through HCVF assessments in Bosnia–Herzegovina and Romania. Biodivers Conserv 18:3395–3406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Irimie DL, Essmann HF (2009) Forest property rights in the frame of public policies and societal change. For Policy Econ 11(2):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Irwin EG, Geoghegan J (2001) Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. J Agric Ecosyst Environ 85(1–3):7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knorn J, Kuemmerle T, Radeloff VC, Szabo A, Mindrescu M, Keeton WS, Abrudan I, Griffiths P, Gancz V, Hostert P (2012) Forest restitution and protected area effectiveness in post-socialist Romania. Biol Cons 146(1):204–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koomen E (2007) Modelling land-use change: progress and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koomen E, Rietveld P, de Nijs T (2008) Modelling land-use change for spatial planning support. Ann Reg Sci 42:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Körner C, Ohsawa M, Spehn E (2005) Mountain systems. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Findings of the conditions and trends working group of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Island, Washington, pp 681–716Google Scholar
  30. Kucsicsa G, Grigorescu I (2018) Urban growth related to distance explanatory factors in Bucharest metropolitan area. Spatial and temporal assessment using logistic regression. J Urban Plan Dev ASCE Libr 144(1):5.  https://doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%29UP.1943-5444.0000415 Google Scholar
  31. Lambin EF (1997) Modelling and monitoring land-cover change processes in tropical regions. Prog Phys Geogr 21:375–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lambin EF, Geist HJ (eds) (2006) Land use and land cover change. Local Processes And Global Impacts. Springer, Berlin, p 222Google Scholar
  33. Lambin EF, Rounsevell MDA, Geist HJ (2000) Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agr Ecosyst Environ 82:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li W, Wu C, Zang S (2014) Modeling urban land use conversion of Daqing City, China: a comparative analysis of ‘‘top-down’’ and ‘‘bottom-up’’ approaches. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28(4):817–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lima ML, Romanelli A, Massone HE (2015) Assessing groundwater pollution hazard changes under different socio-economic and environmental scenarios in an agricultural watershed. Sci Total Environ 530:333–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin PY, Nien-Ming Hong NM, Pei-Jung Wu PJ, Lin CJ (2007) Modeling and assessing land-use and hydrological processes to future land-use and climate change scenarios in watershed land-use planning. Environ Geol 53:623–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacDonald D, Crabtree J, Wiesinger G, Dax T, Stamou N, Fleury P, Gutierrez Lazpita J, Gibon A (2000) Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. J Environ Manag 59:47–69.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manuschevich D, Beier CM (2016) Simulating land use changes under alternative policy scenarios for conservation of native forests in south-central Chile. Land Use Policy 51:350–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mas JF, Filho BS, Pontius RG Jr, Gutiérrez MF, Rodrigues H (2013) A suite of tools for ROC analysis of spatial models. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 2:869–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mihai B, Săvulescu I, Şandric I, Oprea R (2006) Application of change detection to the study of vegetation dynamics in the Bucegi mountains (Southern Carpathians, Romania). Teledetection 6:215–231Google Scholar
  41. Mocanu I, Grigorescu I, Mitrică B, Popovici E-A, Dumitrașcu M (2018) Socio-economic determinants of agriculture in the Romanian plain. J Urb Reg Anal (JURA) X:79–99Google Scholar
  42. Năstase M, Kucsicsa G, Grigorescu I (2010) GIS-Based assessment of the main environmental issues in “Munţii Maramureşului” Natural Park. Proceedings of BALWOIS, conference on water observation and information systems for decision support, Ohrid, MacedoniaGoogle Scholar
  43. Nichiforel L, Schanz H (2011) Property rights distribution and entrepreneurial rent-seeking in Romanian forestry: a perspective of private forest owners. Eur J For Res 130:369–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Noss RF, Cooperrider AY (1994) Saving nature’s legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  45. Otahel J, Feranec J, Suri M, Cebecauer T (2002) Land cover of Slovakia: assessment of its changes. In: Bicík I, Chromy P, Jancak V, Janu H (eds) Land use/land cover changes in the period of globalization. Proceedings of the IGU–LUCC international conference, Prague, 2001. Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, pp 100–109Google Scholar
  46. Patacchini E, Zenou Y (2009) Urban sprawl in Europe. In: Patacchini E, Zenou Y, Henderson JV, Epple Dennis (eds) Urban sprawl in Europe. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, pp 125–149Google Scholar
  47. Petrişor AI (2015) Using CORINE data to look at deforestation in Romania: distribution & possible consequences. Urbanism 6(1):83–90Google Scholar
  48. Pontius GR Jr, Schneider CL (2001) Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agr Ecosyst Environ 85:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Popovici EA, Bălteanu D, Kucsicsa G (2013) Assessment of changes in land-use and land-cover pattern in Romania using Corine land cover database. Carpath J Earth Environ Sci 8(4):195–208Google Scholar
  50. Popovici EA, Bălteanu D, Kucsicsa G (2016) Utilizarea terenurilor și dezvoltarea actuală a agriculturii. In: Bălteanu D, Dumitraşcu M, Geacu S, Mitrică B, Sima M (eds) România. Natură şi societate. Editura Academiei Române, Bucharest, pp 329–374Google Scholar
  51. Popovici EA, Kucsicsa G, Bălteanu D, Grigorescu I, Mitrică B, Dumitrașcu M, Damian N (2018) Past and future land use/cover flows related to agricultural lands in Romania. An assessment using CLUE-S model and CORINE Land Cover database. Carpath J Earth Environ Sci 13(2):613–628Google Scholar
  52. Promper C, Puissant A, Malet JP, Glade T (2014) Analysis of land cover changes in the past and the future contribution to landslide risk scenarios. Appl Geogr 53:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rawat JS, Kumar M (2015) Monitoring land use/cover change using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Hawalbagh block, district Almora, Uttarakhand, India. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 18(1):77–84Google Scholar
  54. Renwick A, Jansson T, Verburg PH, Revoredo-Giha C, Britz W, Gocht A, McCracken D (2013) Policy reform and agricultural land abandonment in the EU. Land Use Policy 30(1):446–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schaldach R, Priess JA (2008) Integrated models of the land system: a review of modelling approaches on the regional to global scale. Living Rev Landsc Res 2(1):1863–7329Google Scholar
  56. Shandra O, Weisberg P, Martazinova V (2013) Influences of climate and land use history on forest and timberline dynamics in the Carpathian mountains during the twentieth century. In: Kozak J, Ostapowicz K, Bytnerowicz A, Wyźga B (eds) The Carpathians: integrating nature and society towards sustainability. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strimbu BM, Hickey GM, Strimbu VG (2005) Forest conditions and management under rapid legislation change in Romania. For Chron 81(3):350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sun J, Southworth J (2013) Remote sensing-based fractal analysis and scale dependence associated with forest fragmentation in an Amazon tri-national frontier. Remote Sens 5:454–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taff GN, Müller D, Kuemmerle T, Ozdeneral E, Stephen J, Walsh JS (2010) Reforestation in central and Eastern Europe after the breakdown of socialism. In: Nagendra H, Southworth J (eds) Reforesting landscapes: linking pattern and process. Springer Landscape Series, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  60. Tasser E, Walde J, Tappeiner U, Teutsch A, Noggler W (2007) Land-use changes and natural reforestation in the Eastern central Alps. Agr Ecosyst Environ 118(1–4):115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tîrlă L, Matei E, Vdulie I, Cuculici R (2012) Analysis of the vegetation cover in the eastern Căpățânii Mountains, Southern Carpathians, Romania) between 1973 and 2005 using remote sensing and GIS data. In: Boltižiar M (ed) Conference abstracts of the 2nd forum Carpaticum. From data to knowledge, from knowledge to action. Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, p 214Google Scholar
  62. Veldkamp A, Fresco LO (1996) CLUE: a conceptual model to study the conversion of land use and its effects. Ecol Model 85:253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Veldkamp A, Lambin EF (2001) Predicting land-use change. Agr Ecosyst Environ 85:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Veldkamp A, Verburg PH, Kok K, Koning GHJ, Priess J, Bergsma AR (2001) The need for scale sensitive approaches in spatially explicit land use change modelling. Environ Model Assess 6:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Verburg PH, Overmars KP (2009) Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model. Landsc Ecol 24(9):1167–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Verburg PH, Veldkamp A (2004) Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landsc Ecol 19:77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Verburg PH, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A, Limpiada R, Espaldon V, Mastura SS (2002) Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. Environ Manage 30(3):391–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Verburg PH, Schot PP, Martin J, Dijst MJ, Veldkamp A (2004) Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal 61:309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wassenaar T, Gerber P, Verburg PH, Rosales M, Ibrahim M, Steinfeld H (2007) Projecting land use changes in the Neotropics: the geography of pasture expansion into forest. Global Environ Change 17(1):86–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Willems E, Lemments T, Buffaria B (2005) Utilisation of CLC 902000 data for monitoring the impact of CAP developments on the rural landscape. In: De Roeck E (ed) Trends of some agro-environmental indicators in the European Union (Report EUR 21565). European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy, pp 15–34. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC32227/lbna21669enc.pdf
  71. Zhou F, Xu Y, Chen Y, Xu CY, Gao Y, Du J (2013) Hydrological response to urbanization at different spatio-temporal scales simulated by coupling of CLUE-S and the SWAT model in the Yangtze River Delta region. J Hydrol 485:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zimmermann P, Tasser E, Leitinger G, Tappeiner U (2010) Effects of land-use and land-cover pattern on landscape-scale biodiversity in the European Alps. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:13–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geography, Romanian AcademyBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations