Landscape and Ecological Engineering

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 189–201 | Cite as

Plant colonization in a gravel mine revegetated with Stylosanthes spp. in a Neotropical savanna

  • Carolina Rizzi Starr
  • Rodrigo Studart Corrêa
  • Tarcíso de Sousa Filgueiras
  • John Du Vall Hay
  • Perseu Fernando dos Santos
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Tree establishment on degraded sites has failed in many tropical areas due to invasive plants and competition with herbs. The cultivation of plants that are capable of maintaining a site can avoid the dominance of invasive species. Some native species of the genus Stylosanthes (family Fabaceae) have been reported to effectively block invasive plants off ecosystems that are under restoration in Brazil. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the influence of perennial Stylosanthes spp. on plant colonization in a rehabilitated gravel mine in the Brazilian savanna region. Half of the mining area was sown with a mixture of three perennial Styloshantes species (treatment), while half of it remained unsown (control). The line intercept method was used to sample recruited plants within the mine after five years of site rehabilitation. Results showed that 31 plant species recruited in the gravel mine: 27 in the area sown with Stylosanthes spp. and 17 in the control area. Native species contributed for 47 % of the importance value index (IVI) in the treated area and 26 % in the control area. Two invasive exotic grasses made up 31 % of the plant community IVI in the treated area and 59 % in the control area. Perennial Stylosanthes spp. were supposed to block the development of incoming plants, but their presence actually allowed the area to be colonized by 1.6-fold more plant species than the control area. Ultimately, the area covered with Stylosanthes spp. evolved into a plant community that was more diverse and less dominated by exotic species than the control area.

Keywords

Mine spoils Plant ecology Reclamation Rehabilitation Restoration 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Ecological Pole Foundation of Brasília for granting us a permit (# 003/2003) to survey the study areas, the staff of the herbarium for helping with plant identification, and the referees who improved the quality of the manuscript. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, and that the experiment complies with the current laws of Brazil, where the experiment was performed.

References

  1. Andrade RP, Karia CT, Ramos AKB (2004) Stylosanthes as a forage legume at its centre of diversity. In: Chakraborty S (ed) High-yielding anthracnoseresistant Stylosanthes for agricultural systems. Aciar, Canberra, pp 39–50Google Scholar
  2. Barbosa KC, Pizo MA (2006) Seed rain and seed limitation in a planted gallery forest in Brazil. Rest Ecol 14:504–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00162.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbosa CEA, Benato T, Cavalheiro A, Torezan JMD (2009) Diversity of regenerating plants in reforestations with Araucaria angustifolia (Bertol.) O. Kuntze of 2, 22, 35, and 43 years of age in Paraná state, Brazil. Rest Ecol 17:60–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00335.x
  4. Brower JE, Jerrold ZH, von Ende CN (1990) Field and laboratory methods for general ecology, 3rd edn. Wm. C. Brown, Kerper BoulevardGoogle Scholar
  5. Connell JH, Slayter RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 11:1119–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corlett RT, Hau BCH (2000) Seed dispersal and forest restoration. In: Elliott S, Kerby J, Hardwick K, Blakesley D, Woods K, Anusarnsunthorn V (eds) Forest restoration for wildlife conservation. International Tropical Timber Organisation and The Forest Restoration Research Unit, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, pp 317–325Google Scholar
  7. D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87Google Scholar
  8. Dale VH, Beyeler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Ind 1:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eiten G (1972) The Cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Bot Rev 38:201–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Embrapa (1997) Manual de métodos de análise de solos, 2nd edn. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  11. Engel PL, Parrota JA (2001) An evaluation of direct seeding for restoration of degraded lands in Central São Paulo state, Brazil. For Ecol Manag 152:169–181. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00600-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Filgueiras TS (1990) Africanas no Brasil: gramíneas introduzidas da África. Caderno de Geociências 5:57–63Google Scholar
  13. Ganade G, Brown VK (2002) Succession in old pastures of Central Amazonia: role of soil fertility and plant litter. Ecology 83:743–754. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0743:SIOPOC]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2001) EcoSim. http://www.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm. Accessed 3rd June 2007
  15. Haridasan M (2000) Nutrição mineral de plantas nativas do Cerrado. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 12:54–64Google Scholar
  16. Hoffmann WA, Haridasan M (2008) The invasive grass, Melinis minutiflora, inhibits tree regeneration in a Neotropical savanna. Aust Ecol 33:29–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01787.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffmann WA, Lucatelli VMPC, Silva FJ, Azevedo INC, Marinho MS, Albuquerque AMS, Lopes AO, Moreira SP (2004) Impact of the invasive alien grass Melinis minutiflora at the savanna—forest ecotone in the Brazilian Cerrado. Divers Distrib 10:99–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00063.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howe HF, Miriti MN (2004) When seed dispersal matters. BioScience 54:651–660. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0651:WSDM]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inmet—Instituto Nacional de Metereologia (2008) Website. http://www.inmet.gov.br. Accessed 12 Dec 2008
  20. Karia CT, Andrade RP, Charchar MJD, Gomes AC (2002) Caracterização morfológica de acessos do gênero Stylosanthes no banco ativo de germoplasma da Embrapa Cerrados—Coleção 1994/1995 (Boletim de desenvolvimento de pesquisa, n. 72). Embrapa Cerrados, PlanaltinaGoogle Scholar
  21. Klink CA (1996) Germination and seedling establishment of two native and one invading African grass species in the Brazilian Cerrado. J Trop Ecol 12:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klink CA, Machado RB (2005) Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conserv Biol 19:707–713. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00702.x Google Scholar
  23. Kumar A, Raghuwanshi R, Upadhyay RS (2010) Arbuscular mycorrhizal technology in reclamation and revegetation of coal mine spoils under various revegetation models. Engineering 2:683–689. doi: 10.4236/eng.2010.29088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorenzi H (2000) Plantas daninhas do Brasil: terrestres, aquáticas, parasitas e tóxicas. Instituto Plantarum, Nossa OdessaGoogle Scholar
  25. Magurran AE (2000) Diversidad ecológica y su medición. Ediciones Vedra, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  26. Martins CR, Leite LL, Haridasan M (2001) Recuperação de uma área degradada pela mineração de cascalho com uso de gramíneas nativas. Revista Árvore 24:157–166Google Scholar
  27. Martins CR, Leite LL, Haridasan M (2004) Molasses grass (Melinis minutiflora P. Beauv.), an exotic species compromising the recuperation of degraded areas in conservation units. Revista Árvore 28:739–747. doi: 10.1590/S0100-67622004000500014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mobot—Missouri Botanical Garden (2009) W Tropicos. http://mobot.mobot.Org/W3T/search/vast.html. Accessed 13 Dec 2009
  29. Moreira HJC, Bragança HBN (2010) Manual de identificação de plantas infestantes: arroz. FMC, CampinasGoogle Scholar
  30. Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Muoghalu JI, Chuba DK (2005) Seed germination and reproductive strategies of Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) Gray and Tithonia rotundifolia (P.M) Blake. Appl Ecol Environ Res 3:39–46Google Scholar
  32. Odum EP (1988) Ecology. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  33. Opler PA, Baker HG (1980) Plant reproductive characteristics during secondary succession in neotropical lowland forest ecosystems. Biotropica 12:40–46. doi: 10.2307/2388155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2006) The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments. Front Ecol Environ 4:196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pathikonda S, Ackleh AS, Hasenstein KH, Mopper S (2008) Invasion, disturbance, and competition: modeling the fate of coastal plant populations. Conserv Biol 23:164–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01073.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phengsavanh P, Ledin I (2003) Effect of Stylo 184 (Stylosanthes guianensis CIAT 184) and Gamba grass (Andropogon gayanus cv. Kent) in diets for growing goats. Livest Res Rural Dev 15:10. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/10/cont1510.htm. Accessed 13 Dec 2011
  37. Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Pivello VR, Carvalho VMC, Lopes PF, Peccinini AA, Rosso S (1999) Abundance and distribution of native and alien grasses in a Cerrado (Brazilian savanna) biological reserve. Biotropica 31:71–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.1999.tb00117.x Google Scholar
  39. Raman TRS, Mudappa D, Kapoor V (2008) Restoring rainforest fragments: survival of mixed-native species seedlings under contrasting site conditions in the Western Ghats, India. Restor Ecol 17:137–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00367.x
  40. Rodrigues RR, Lima RAF, Gandolfi S, Nave AG (2009) On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experience in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol Conserv 142:1242–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruiz-Jaen MC, Aide TM (2005) Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restor Ecol 13:569–577. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00072.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sampaio AB, Holl KD, Scariot A (2007) Regeneration of seasonal deciduous forest tree species in long-used pastures in Central Brazil. Biotropica 39:655–659. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00295.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Santos GG, Silveira PM, Marchão RL, Becquer T, Balbino LC (2008) Soil macrofauna communities and cover crops in a Cerrado Oxisol under no tillage. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 43:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ser—Society for Ecological Restoration International Science and Policy Working Group (2004) The SER primer on ecological restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration, Tucson. http://www.ser.org
  45. Silva LCR, Corrêa RS (2010) Evolution of substrate quality of a mined area in the Brazilian savanna after revegetation with Stylosanthes spp. Rev Bras Eng Agríc Ambient 4:835–841. doi: 10.1590/S1415-43662010000800007 Google Scholar
  46. Singh AN, Raghubanshi AS, Singh JS (2002) Plantation as a tool for mine spoil restoration. Curr Sci 82:1436–1441Google Scholar
  47. Toh I, Gillespie M, Lamb D (1999) The role of isolated trees in facilitating tree seedling recruitment at a degraded sub-tropical rainforest site. Restor Ecol 7:288–297. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72022.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vitor CMT, Fonseca DM, Moreira LM, Fagundes JL, Nascimento Júnior D, Ribeiro Júnior JI, Pereira AL (2008) Yield and chemical-proximal composition of signalgrass established on a degraded molassesgrass pasture. Rev Bras Zootec 37:2107–2114. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982008001200004
  49. Walter BMT (2006) Fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado: síntese terminológica e relações florísticas (dissertation). The University of Brasília, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  50. Yarranton GA, Morrison RG (1974) Spatial dynamics of a primary succession: nucleation. J Ecol 62:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering and Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolina Rizzi Starr
    • 1
  • Rodrigo Studart Corrêa
    • 1
  • Tarcíso de Sousa Filgueiras
    • 2
  • John Du Vall Hay
    • 1
  • Perseu Fernando dos Santos
    • 3
  1. 1.University of BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil
  2. 2.Botanic Institute of São Paulo, IBOTSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Catholic University of BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations