Landscape and Ecological Engineering

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 111–120 | Cite as

Influence of nonclimatic factors on the habitat prediction of tree species and an assessment of the impact of climate change

  • Motoki Higa
  • Ikutaro Tsuyama
  • Katsuhiro Nakao
  • Etsuko Nakazono
  • Tetsuya Matsui
  • Nobuyuki Tanaka
Original Paper

Abstract

To determine the influence of nonclimatic factors on predicting the habitats of tree species and an assessment of climate change impacts over a broad geographical extent at about 1 km resolution, we investigated the predictive performance for models with climatic factors only (C-models) and models with climatic and nonclimatic factors (CN-models) using seven tree species in Japan that exhibit different ecological characteristics such as habitat preference and successional traits. Using a generalized additive model, the prediction performance was compared by prediction accuracy [area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC)], goodness of fit, and potential habitat maps. The results showed that the CN-models had higher predictive accuracy, higher goodness of fit, smaller empty habitats, and more finely defined borders of potential habitat than those of the C-models for all seven species. The degree of the total contribution of the nonclimatic variables to prediction performance also varied among the seven species. These results suggest that nonclimatic factors also play an important role in predicting species occurrence when measured to this extent and resolution, that the magnitude of model improvement is larger for species with specific habitat preferences, and that the C-models cannot predict the land-related habitats that exist for almost all species. Climate change impacts were overestimated by C-models for all species. Therefore, C-model outcomes may lead to locally ambiguous assessment of the impact of climate change on species distribution. CN-models provide a more accurate and detailed assessment for conservation planning.

Keywords

Broad geographical extent Fine spatial resolution Habitat preference Predictive performance Species distribution model 

Supplementary material

11355_2011_183_MOESM1_ESM.eps (465 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (EPS 464 kb)
11355_2011_183_MOESM2_ESM.eps (661 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (EPS 660 kb)
11355_2011_183_MOESM3_ESM.eps (814 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (EPS 814 kb)
11355_2011_183_MOESM4_ESM.eps (1002 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (EPS 1001 kb)
11355_2011_183_MOESM5_ESM.eps (933 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (EPS 933 kb)
11355_2011_183_MOESM6_ESM.eps (991 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (EPS 991 kb)
11355_2011_183_MOESM7_ESM.eps (822 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (EPS 822 kb)
11355_2011_183_MOESM8_ESM.eps (677 kb)
Supplementary material 8 (EPS 677 kb)
11355_2011_183_MOESM9_ESM.eps (840 kb)
Supplementary material 9 (EPS 840 kb)
11355_2011_183_MOESM10_ESM.eps (1.1 mb)
Supplementary material 10 (EPS 1076 kb)

References

  1. Armonies W, Reise K (2003) Empty habitat in coastal sediments for populations of macrozoobenthos. Helgoland Mar Res 56:276–287Google Scholar
  2. Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der vegetationuskunde. 3 Aufl. Springer, WienGoogle Scholar
  3. Coudun C, Gégout J (2007) Quantitative prediction of the distribution and abundance of Vaccinium myrtillus with climatic and edaphic factors. J Veg Sci 18:517–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coudun C, Gégout J, Piedallu C, Rameau J (2006) Soil nutritional factors improve models of plant species distribution: an illustration with Acer campestre (l.) in france. J Biogeogr 33:1750–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. General Development Bureau, Economic Planning Agency of Japan (1967–1978) Land classification maps, 47 volumesGoogle Scholar
  6. Geographical Survay Institute (2000) Digital map 50 m grid (elevation). Nippon-III. Japan Map Center, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  7. Geographical Survay Institute (2001a) Digital map 50 m grid (elevation). Nippon-I. Japan Map Center, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  8. Geographical Survay Institute (2001b) Digital map 50 m grid (elevation). Nippon-II. Japan Map Center, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  9. Geological Survey of Japan (2010) Seamless digital geological map of Japan 1: 200,000. 1 Feb 2010 version. Research Information Database DB084, Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  10. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Araújo MB, Virkkala R, Thuiller W, Sykes MT (2006) Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Prog Phys Geog 30:751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horikawa M, Tsuyama I, Matsui T, Kominami Y, Tanaka N (2009) Assessing the potential impacts of climate change on the alpine habitat suitability of Japanese stone pine. Landsc Ecol 24:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huston M (1994) Biological diversity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Ibáñez I, Silander JA, Wilson AM, LaFleur N, Tanaka N, Tsuyama I (2009) Multivariate forecasts of potential distributions of invasive plant species. Ecol Appl 19:359–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Iverson LR, Prasad AM (1998) Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern united states. Ecol Monogr 68:465–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Japan Botanical History Editing Committee (2009) Japan botanical history, vol 1. Japan Forestry Investigation Committee, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  19. Japan Meteorological Agency (1996) Climate normals for Japan. Japan Meteorological Business Support Center, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  20. Japan Meteorological Agency (2004) MRI-RCM20. Global Environment and Marine Department of Japan Meteorological Agency, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  21. Kira T (1991) Forest ecosystems of east and southeast Asia in a global perspective. Ecol Res 6:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luoto M, Heikkinen RK (2008) Disregarding topographical heterogeneity biases species turnover assessments based on bioclimatic models. Glob Change Biol 14:483–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Pöyry J, Saarinen K (2006) Determinants of the biogeographical distribution of butterflies in boreal regions. J Biogeogr 33:1764–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luoto M, Virkkala R, Heikkinen RK (2007) The role of land cover in bioclimatic models depends on spatial resolution. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marini L, Prosser F, Klimek S, Marrs RH (2008) Water-energy, land-cover and heterogeneity drivers of the distribution of plant species richness in a mountain region of the european alps. J Biogeogr 35:1826–1839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matsui T, Yagihashi T, Nakaya T, Taoda H, Yoshinaga S, Daimaru H, Tanaka N (2004) Probability distributions, vulnerability and sensitivity in Fagus crenata forests following predicted climate changes in japan. J Veg Sci 15:605–614Google Scholar
  27. Ohsawa M (1993) Latitudinal pattern of mountain vegetation zonation in southern and eastern asia. J Veg Sci 4:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Liu C (2004) Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 27:285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
  31. Randin CF, Engler R, Normand S, Zappa M, Zimmermann NE, Pearman PB, Vittoz P, Thuiller W, Guisan A (2009) Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high-elevation persistence. Glob Change Biol 15:1557–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J, Müller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinforma 12:77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stefanescu C, Herrando S, Paŕamo F (2004) Butterfly species richness in the north-west mediterranean basin: the role of natural and human-induced factors. J Biogeogr 31:905–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tanaka N (2007) PRDB (Phytosociological reléve data base). Environmental change impact team, forestry and forest products research institute. http://www.ffpri.affrc.go.jp/labs/prdb/index.html
  36. The Plant List (2010) Version 1. http://www.theplantlist.org/. Accessed 1 Jan 2011
  37. Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Lavorel S (2004) Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in europe? J Biogeogr 31:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:8245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thuiller W, Vayreda J, Joan Pino SS, Lavorel S, Gracia C (2003) Large-scale environmental correlates of forest tree distributions in Catalonia (NE Spain). Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tsuyama I, Nakao I, Matsui T, Higa M, Horikawa M, Kominami Y, Tanaka N (2011) Climatic controls of a keystone understory species, Sasamorpha borealis, and an impact assessment of climate change in Japan. Ann For Sci 68:689–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Virkkala R, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Leikola N (2005) Distribution patterns of boreal marshland birds: modelling the relationships to land cover and climate. J Biogeogr 32:1957–1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Virkkala R, Marmion M, Heikkinen RK, Thuiller W, Luoto M (2010) Predicting range shifts of northern bird species: influence of modelling technique and topography. Acta Oecol 36:269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models. An introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  45. Yokozawa M, Goto S, Hayashi Y, Seino H (2003) Mesh climate change data for evaluating climate change impacts in Japan under gradually increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration. J Agric Meteorol 59:117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering and Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Motoki Higa
    • 1
  • Ikutaro Tsuyama
    • 1
  • Katsuhiro Nakao
    • 1
  • Etsuko Nakazono
    • 1
  • Tetsuya Matsui
    • 2
  • Nobuyuki Tanaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant EcologyForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Hokkaido Research StationForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteSapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations