Satoyama–satoumi sub-global assessment in Japan and involvement of the Hokkaido Cluster
- 225 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
A sub-global assessment (SGA) began in Japan in November 2006, and is projected to end in May 2010, when the Tenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP10) will be held in Nagoya City. Since May 2008, we have been involved in the evaluation of the Hokkaido Cluster, one of four clusters assessed. This report provides a brief background of the relationships between the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) and the SGA, and the governance structure of the SGA in Japan. It also describes our efforts in assessing the Hokkaido Cluster and discusses the challenges of SGA at the cluster and national levels. The MA was a 4-year international appraisal of scientific knowledge on world ecosystems and included global and sub-global assessment. After the MA, Japan began a satoyama–satoumi SGA in 2006. This is composed of six teams: the board, a science assessment panel, author groups, local advisory bodies, the board of review editors, and secretariat. Author groups include a national group and groups for four local clusters: Hokkaido, Tohoku, Hoku-shin-etsu, and Western Japan. Work in the Hokkaido Cluster began with a small group in 2008. Authors for the cluster report were selected from among experts on important events regarding satoyama and satoumi in Hokkaido. Generally, Hokkaido has no traditional satoyama–satoumi landscapes created by long-term interactions with the local people. We are now seeking the style of sustainable nature use that is best suited to Hokkaido. The SGA in Japan now faces the challenge of integrating the four cluster assessments according to common indicators.
Keywords
Ecosystem services Human well-being Multi-scale assessment Northern satoyama Exploitive farmingNotes
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to one of the cochairs of the sub-global assessment in Japan, Prof. Koji Nakamura of Kanazawa University, for giving us the great opportunity to participate in the assessment, and to the staff of UNU-IAS, especially Maiko Nishi, for providing us with informative documents.
References
- Costanza R, Folke C (1997) Valuing ecosystem services with efficiency, fairness and sustainability as goals. In: Daily GC (ed) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island press, Washington DC, pp 49–68Google Scholar
- De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description, and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hokkaido (2005) Northern satoyama planning—for the conservation of immediate forests, p 44 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Kambu A (2008) The need to conserve the vanishing satoyama heritage. In: Furuta N (ed) Conserving nature—Japanese perspective. Biodiversity network Japan, Tokyo, pp 12–19Google Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being-volume 4—multiscale assessments: findings of the sub-global assessments working group. Island Press, Washington DC, p 388Google Scholar
- Ministry of Environment (2007) National strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity 3rd, pp 23–25 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Shidei T (2006) Forest should not be “mori” and “hayashi”—my forest theory. Nakanishiya Shuppan co., Kyoto, p 277 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Takeuchi K, Brown RD, Washitani I, Yokohari M (2003) Satoyama—the traditional rural landscape of Japan, 2nd edn. Springer, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Tawara K (2008) History of green environment in Hokkaido. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Translation Committee of the 21st Century COE Program (2007) Ecosystems and human well-being. Ohmsha Ltd, Tokyo, p 241 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- UNU-IAS (2008) Background notes for sub-global assessment (SGA) of satoyama and satoumi in Japan, p 10Google Scholar
- Yanagi T (1998) Civil engineering and environmental conservation in the coastal sea. JSCE Magazine 83(12):32–33 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Yanagi T (2006) Satoumi-ron. Kouseisha-kouseikaku co., Tokyo, p 102 (in Japanese)Google Scholar