Landscape and Ecological Engineering

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 133–138 | Cite as

How management practices affect arthropod communities on Japanese golf courses?

  • Mika Yasuda
  • Fumito Koike
  • Max Terman
Short Communication


Potentially, golf courses could act as wildlife refuges under adequate golf course management. We assessed the impacts of golf course managements on arthropod communities by analyzing arthropod community data. Arthropods were collected using a sweeping-net method from turf areas. Information of management applied in each golf course such as frequency of chemical use, length of grass was obtained by field measurements and also from interviews based on management records with green keepers. In total, 92 invertebrate families were collected. Of 44 frequently appearing families, the number of individuals in 22 arthropods families such as Delphacidae and Deltocephalidae were associated with some kind of course management features. Length of grass was the most influential factor to those families. After removing the effect of the grass length by regression analysis, herbicide affected six families. The effects of frequency of the use of fungicide and insecticide were not detected in this study.


Arthropod community Turf grass Grass length Pesticide Herbicide 



We would like to acknowledge the club managers and green keepers for access to their courses and for the information they made available for this study. We would also like to thank M. Nagano, M. Suto and M. Ozaki for helping to identify some of the invertebrate specimens. Thanks are also due to A. Bennett and N. Nakatani for comments on an earlier draft, to several anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript.


  1. Chiba agricultural experiment station (1999) Interim report: study of management turf grass without any use of pesticide. Chiba agricultural experimental station, Chiba, Japan, p 344 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. Green HB, Marshall CI (1987) An assessment of the role of golf courses in Kent, England, in protecting wildlife and landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 14:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gange AC, Lindsay DE, Schofield JM (2003) The ecology of golf courses. Biologist 50:63–68Google Scholar
  4. Hodgkison SC, Hero J-M, Warnken J (2007) The conservation value of suburban golf courses in a rapidly urbanising region of Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 79:323–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jo Y-K, Smitley DR (2003) Predation of Ataenius spretulus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) eggs and grubs by species of Carabidae and Staphylinidae on golf courses in Michigan. Environ Entomol 32:1370–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Klein MG, Tumlinson JH, Ladd TL Jr, Doolittle RE (1981) Japanese beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): response to synthetic sex attractant plus phenethyl propionate: eugenol. J Chem Ecol 7:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kurita E, Yokohari M (2001) Ecological potentials of golf courses on hills for the conservation of Satoyama Landscapes. Landsc Res 64:589–594 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Mankin RK (2000) An integrated approach for modelling and managing golf course water quality and ecosystem diversity. Ecol Modell 133:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Markwick CM (2000) Golf tourism development, stakeholders, differing discourses and alternative agendas. Tourism Manage 21:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Platt AE (1994) Toxic green-the trouble with golf. World Watch 7:27–32Google Scholar
  11. Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH (2003) Improving the quality of environmental assessments using the concept of natural capital: a case study from southern Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 63:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sorace A, Visentin M (2007) Avian diversity on golf courses and surrounding landscapes in Italy. Landsc Urban Plan 81:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Standen V (2000) The adequacy of collecting techniques for estimating species richness of grassland invertebrates. J Appl Ecol 37:884–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Suzuki T, Kondo H, Yaguchi K, Maki T, Suga T (1998) Estimation of leachability and persistence of pesticides at golf courses from point-source monitoring and model to predict pesticide leaching to ground water. Environ Sci Technol 32:920–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tanner RA, Gange AC (2005) Effects of golf courses on local biodiversity. Landsc Urban Plan 71:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Terman MR (1998) Natural links: naturalistic golf courses as wildlife habitat. Landsc Urban Plan 38:183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Terman MR (2001) Prairie Dunes country club: a golf course for birdies. Regional perspectives in environmental science: case study.
  18. Winter JG, Dillon PJ (2005) Effects of golf course construction and operation on water chemistry of headwater streams on the Precambrian shield. Environ Pollut 133:243–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yasuda M, Koike F (2006) Do golf courses provide a refuge for flora and fauna in Japanese urban landscapes? Landsc Urban Plan 75:58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering and Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environment and Information SciencesYokohama National UniversityYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentTabor CollegeHillsboroUSA

Personalised recommendations