Landscape and Ecological Engineering

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 3–15 | Cite as

Status and ecological resource value of the Republic of Korea’s De-militarized Zone

  • Kwi-Gon KimEmail author
  • Dong-Gil Cho


This paper explores the status and value of ecological resources found in the De-militarized Zone (DMZ), an area of land separating North and South Korea, in terms of habitats and species. This approach contrasts with a conventional species-driven approach. There have been few surveys of ecological resources in the DMZ due to land mines and security issues. As such, there appear to be a number of less well known habitats and understudied and data deficient species within the DMZ. This paper seeks to improve knowledge of ecological resources within the DMZ by combining and synthesizing the author’s study results with the outcome of surveys of the DMZ conducted by various organizations. The paper also includes ecological mapping results. Conservation value is assessed using priorities identified by a number of Korean and foreign institutions. The conservation value of habitats, particularly of wetlands including peatland, is based on the Ramsar Site criteria, the International Peat Society criteria, and the designation criteria for the UNESCO World Natural Heritage and Biosphere Reserve. As in-depth studies on the functions of DMZ habitats are not available due to the constraints mentioned above, the habitat assessment is inevitably tentative. Species value is based on the IUCN’s Red Data Book (1997). This paper seeks to be used as material contributing to the conservation and sustainable use of the DMZ. In particular, this paper aims to aid in the designation of the DMZ as a World Natural Heritage site through the identification and suggestion of key or prime biodiversity areas within the DMZ. This is completed by using a model suggested by English Nature (UK) based on the aforementioned criteria.


Conservation value assessment Ramsar Site Wetlands World Natural Heritage Biosphere reserve 



The authors would like to thank Hee-Sun Choi, Mi-young Park, Jin-hee Park, Seon Kim, Nam-Kyoun, Kim and Dae-hee Kim of the Environment and Ecological Planning Laboratory at SNU for their assistance and help in field surveys on major sites in the DMZ, as well as for data compilation during the preparation of this paper.


  1. Goseong County (2002) The natural ecosystem survey. Report of the DMZ neighboring areaGoogle Scholar
  2. IUCN (1997) Declaration of principles, PARKS-Parks for Peace, vol 7, No 3Google Scholar
  3. KFRI (2000) Office of Forestry. Comprehensive Report on surveys of forest ecosystems in the DMZ and Border areas 1995–2000Google Scholar
  4. Kim KG (2004) Present condition of DMZ’s ecological and cultural resources, and method of environment-friendly utilization. Chung-Sa-Cho- RongGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim KG (2000) The Biota in the DMZ and CCA; Around Paju Area. SNU, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim KG (2000) The DMZ from a nature conservation perspective; focusing on wetland ecosystem conservation and management. A Symposium on “Reasonable Conservation and Management of the DMZ”, pp 64–80Google Scholar
  7. Kim KG (2003a) Wetland and environment. AcademyGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim KG (2003b) Environment and ecology joint survey and evaluation of Donghae railroad-road-tentative roadGoogle Scholar
  9. Korea Rail Network Authority (2004) Report of Donghae North Line (Jujin-MDL) post-EIA of 2003Google Scholar
  10. Ku BH, Kim KG (2001) Study on wetland type categorization in the ROK: with a focus on DMZ and Han Riverside Zone. Spring Academic Research Presentation Document of Korean Environment Restoration and Afforestation Technology Society, pp 72–77Google Scholar
  11. Kyungeui inter-Korean Road Joint Environment Survey Team (2001) Environment impact assessment Report on Road Expansion and Construction for Unification Bridge~Jangdan Section. Ministry of Construction& Transportation, Seoul Local National Land Management Agency p 658Google Scholar
  12. MAB France (2000) BIOSPHERE RESERVES- Domains for people and nature, Octavius GallimardGoogle Scholar
  13. Ministry of Environment (2003) Comprehensive Report on the Ecological Survey of the DMZGoogle Scholar
  14. The Joong-ang Daily News (2000) Special feature [There Lies the Truce Line] 6. The New Bud of Separation. (Kim, Kwi-Gon)Google Scholar
  15. The National UNESCO-MAB Committee of Poland (2000) Biosphere Reserves on Borders, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  16. The Seoul Daily News. 6 July – 9 Sept 2004. [DMZ 51 years Ecosystem. The brightness and shadow] (Kim KG)Google Scholar
  17. UNDP.SNU (2000) A detailed study and proposal for ESSD in Northern Kyunggi Province (ROK/96/007)Google Scholar
  18. UNESCO (2000) Solving the puzzle- the ecosystem approach and biosphere reserves, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. UNESCO/MAB (1995) Standing Working Group of the Biosphere Reserves in Germany, Guidelines for Protection, Maintenance and Development of the Biosphere Reserves in GermanyGoogle Scholar
  20. Sutherland WJ, Hill DA (2002) Managing habitats for conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering and Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Landscape ArchitectureSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations