Advertisement

Non-destructive Surface Residual Stress Profiling by Multireflection Grazing Incidence X-Ray Diffraction: a 7050 Al Alloy Study

  • V. A. N. RighettiEmail author
  • T. M. B. Campos
  • L. B. Robatto
  • R. R. Rego
  • G. P. Thim
Research paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

The multireflection grazing incidence X-ray diffraction method (MGIXD) was used to analyze the surface residual stresses in 7050 Al alloy samples. This technique can provide a non-destructive stress profile in function of sample depth, avoiding the relaxation effects intrinsic to destructive methods. The state of residual stress in aeronautical aluminium samples was modulated by milling and shot peening processes. After structural characterization, the residual stress states of the samples were analyzed by multireflection and conventional stress measurement methods. The milled samples presented tensile surface residual stress relaxation attributed to thermal effects and the shot peened samples showed strong compressive stress at sub-surface, which intensity was reduced near the surface. The residual stress profiles of the Al samples were obtained by MGIXD method that evidenced properties commonly undetected in conventional residual stress studies.

Keywords

residual stress non-destructive profiling MGIXD shot peening 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support from CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) is thankfully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Prime MB (2018) The two-way relationship between residual stress and fatigue/fracture. In: Carroll J, Xia S, Beese A, Berke R, Pataky G (eds) Fracture, Fatigue, Failure and Damage Evolution, Conference proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, vol 7. Springer, Cham, pp 19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carvalho ALM, Voorwald HJC (2007) Influence of shot peening and hard chromium electroplating on the fatigue strength of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy. Int J Fatigue 29:1282–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Withers PJ (2007) Residual stress and its role in failure. Rep Prog Phys 70:2211–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhuang WZ, Halford GR (2001) Investigation of residual stress relaxation under cyclic load. Int J Fatigue 23:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krishna LR et al (2018) Influence of prior shot peening variables on the fatigue life of micro arc oxidation coated 6061-T6 Al alloy. Int J Fatigue 106:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noyan IC, Cohen JB (1999). Residual stress measurement by diffraction and interpretation. Springer series on materials research and engineering. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg chs. 5 and 6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonner N, Wimpory R, Webster G, Fry A, Kandil F (2002) Measurement of residual stress through a shot peened surface subjected to successive material removal. Mater Sci Forum 404:653–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alkaisee R, Peng RL (2014) Influence of layer removal methods in residual stress profiling of a shot peened steel using X-ray diffraction. Adv Mater Res 996:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dolle H (1979) The influence of multiaxial stress states, stress gradients and elastic anisotropy on the evaluation of (residual) stresses by X-rays. J Appl Crystallogr 12:489–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Skrzypek SJ, Baczmański A, Ratuszek W, Kusior E (2001) New approach to stress analysis based on grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction. J Appl Crystallogr 34:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prevey PS (1986) X-Ray diffraction residual stress techiniques. Metals Handbook 10:380–392Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baczmanski A, Braham C, Seiler W, Shiraki N (2004) Multi-reflection method and grazing incidence geometry used for stress measurement by X-ray diffraction. Surf Coat Technol 182:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watkins TR, Cavin OB, Bai J, Chediak JA (2003) Residual stress determinations using parallel beam optics. Adv X-ray Anal 46:119–129Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Genzel C (1994) Formalism for the evaluation of strongly non-linear surface stress fields by X-ray diffraction performed in the scattering vector mode. Physica status solidi (a) 146, 629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marciszko M et al (2017) Stress measurements by multi-reflection grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction method (MGIXD) using different radiation wavelengths and different incident angles. Acta Mater 123:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Toby BH, Von Dreele RB (2013) GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package. J Appl Crystallogr 46:544–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tang ZT (2008) Study on residual stresses in milling Aluminium alloy 7050-T7451, in: advanced design and manufacture to gain a competitive edge: new manufacturing techniques and their role in improving enterprise performance, springerGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luan W, Jiang C, Ji V (2009) Thermal relaxation of residual stresses in shot peened surface layer on Ti2Al composite at elevated temperatures. Mater Trans 50:1499–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Benedetti M, Fontanari V, Scardi P, Ricardo CLA, Bandini M (2009) Reverse bending fatigue of shot peened 7075-T651 aluminium alloy: the role of residual stress relaxation. Int J Fatigue 31:1225–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Tecnológico de AeronáuticaSão José dos CamposBrazil

Personalised recommendations