Skip to main content
Log in

Diffraction-Assisted Light Field Microscopy for Microtomography and Digital Volume Correlation with Improved Spatial Resolution

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Light field microscopy (LFM) is capable of ultrafast tomographic reconstruction using a light field image acquired in a single snapshot. However, the axial resolution of LFM is inferior to its lateral resolution and is non-uniform in the axial direction. A diffraction-assisted light field microscopy (DLFM) method is proposed in this work to achieve resolution enhancement over the conventional LFM. DLFM makes use of a transmission diffraction grating inserted between the specimen and microscope objective. Light field images of different diffraction orders are formed on the sensor plane and encode both the spatial and angular information of light rays emanating from the specimen. A wave optics model is developed to derive the point spread functions (PSFs) of DLFM, which are then used to deconvolute the light field images for tomographic reconstruction. Validation tests are performed on both experimental and simulated data and the results show that DLFM effectively improves the axial resolution without compromising the lateral resolution. Furthermore, we show that tomographic reconstruction using DLFM can be combined with digital volume correlation (DVC) to achieve three-dimensional, full-field displacement measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharpe J, Ahlgren U, Perry P, Hill B, Ross A, Hecksher-Sørensen J, Baldock R, Davidson D (2002) Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies. Science 296:541–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maskarinec SA, Franck C, Tirrell DA, Ravichandran G (2009) Quantifying cellular traction forces in three dimensions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:22108–22113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gabriele ML, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Xu J, Kim J, Kagemann L, Folio LS, Schuman JS (2010) Three dimensional optical coherence tomography imaging: advantages and advances. Prog Retin Eye Res 29:556–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van de Kamp T, Vagovič P, Baumbach T, Riedel A (2011) A biological screw in a beetle’s leg. Science 333:52–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Notbohm J, Lesman A, Tirrell DA, Ravichandran G (2015) Quantifying cell-induced matrix deformation in three dimensions based on imaging matrix fibers. Integr Biol 7:1186–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elmoutaouakkil A, Salvo L, Maire E, Peix G (2002) 2D and 3D characterization of metal foams using X-ray tomography. Adv Eng Mater 4:803–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maire E, Colombo P, Adrien J, Babout L, Biasetto L (2007) Characterization of the morphology of cellular ceramics by 3D image processing of X-ray tomography. J Eur Ceram Soc 27:1973–1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Uchic MD, Holzer L, Inkson BJ, Principe EL, Munroe P (2007) Three-dimensional microstructural characterization using focused ion beam tomography. MRS Bull 32:408–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez J, Sun K, Huang M, Lambros J, Dillon S, Chasiotis I (2014) Three dimensional studies of particle failure in silicon based composite electrodes for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 269:334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Levoy M, Ng R, Adams A, Footer M, Horowitz M (2006) Light field microscopy. In: ACM transactions on graphics (TOG). ACM, pp 924–934

  11. Broxton M, Grosenick L, Yang S, Cohen N, Andalman A, Deisseroth K, Levoy M (2013) Wave optics theory and 3-D deconvolution for the light field microscope. Opt Express 21:25418–25439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen N, Yang S, Andalman A, Broxton M, Grosenick L, Deisseroth K, Horowitz M, Levoy M (2014) Enhancing the performance of the light field microscope using wavefront coding. Opt Express 22:24817–24839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prevedel R, Yoon Y-G, Hoffmann M, Pak N, Wetzstein G, Kato S, Schrödel T, Raskar R, Zimmer M, Boyden ES (2014) Simultaneous whole-animal 3D imaging of neuronal activity using light-field microscopy. Nat Methods 11:727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakmann K, Kasevich M (2014) Single-shot three-dimensional imaging of dilute atomic clouds. Opt Lett 39:5317–5320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lott GE, Marciniak MA, Burke JH (2017) Three-dimensional imaging of trapped cold atoms with a light field microscope. Appl Opt 56:8738–8745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cong L, Wang Z, Chai Y, Hang W, Shang C, Yang W, Bai L, Du J, Wang K, Wen Q (2017) Rapid whole brain imaging of neural activity in freely behaving larval zebrafish (Danio rerio). eLife 6:e28158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xia S, Gdoutou A, Ravichandran G (2013) Diffraction assisted image correlation: a novel method for measuring three-dimensional deformation using two-dimensional digital image correlation. Exp Mech 53:755–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Notbohm J, Rosakis A, Kumagai S, Xia S, Ravichandran G (2013) Three-dimensional displacement and shape measurement with a diffraction-assisted grid method. Strain 49:399–408

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pan Z, Xia S, Gdoutou A, Ravichandran G (2015) Diffraction-assisted image correlation for three-dimensional surface profiling. Exp Mech 55:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xia S, Pan Z, Zhang J (2014) Optical microscope for three-dimensional surface displacement and shape measurements at the microscale. Opt Lett 39:4267–4270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Gu, Advanced optical imaging theory, Springer Science & Business Media, 2000

  22. Richardson WH (1972) Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration. JOSA 62:55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lucy LB (1974) An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions. Astron J 79:745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bar-Kochba E, Toyjanova J, Andrews E, Kim K-S, Franck C (2015) A fast iterative digital volume correlation algorithm for large deformations. Exp Mech 55:261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vio R, Bardsley J, Wamsteker W (2005) Least-squares methods with Poissonian noise: analysis and comparison with the Richardson-Lucy algorithm. Astron Astrophys 436:741–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dey N, Blanc-Feraud L, Zimmer C, Roux P, Kam Z, Olivo-Marin JC, Zerubia J (2006) Richardson–Lucy algorithm with total variation regularization for 3D confocal microscope deconvolution. Microsc Res Tech 69:260–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Haythornthwaite Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Xia.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, Z., Lu, M. & Xia, S. Diffraction-Assisted Light Field Microscopy for Microtomography and Digital Volume Correlation with Improved Spatial Resolution. Exp Mech 59, 713–724 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-019-00522-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-019-00522-2

Keywords

Navigation