Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 58, Issue 7, pp 1157–1167 | Cite as

The Effect of Edge Compliance on the Contact between a Spherical Indenter and a High-Aspect-Ratio Rectangular Fin

  • G. StanEmail author
  • E. Mays
  • H. J. Yoo
  • S. W. King
Article
  • 144 Downloads

Abstract

In the last two decades, significant progress has been made on developing new nanoscale mechanical property measurement techniques including instrumented indentation and atomic force microscopy based techniques. The changes in the tip-sample contact mechanics during measurements uniquely modify the displacement and force sensed by a measurement sensor and much effort is dedicated to correctly retrieve the sample mechanical properties from the measured signal. It turns out that in many cases, for the sake of simplicity, a simple contact mechanics model is adopted by overlooking the complexity of the actual contact geometry. In this work, a newly developed matrix formulation is used to solve the stress and strain equations for samples with edge geometries. Such sample geometries are often encountered in today’s nanoscale integrated electronics in the form of high-aspect-ratio fins with widths in the range of tens of nanometers. In the matrix formulation, the fin geometries can be easily modeled as adjacent overlapped half-spaces and the contact problem can be solved by a numerical implementation of the conjugate gradient method. This method is very versatile in terms of contact geometry and contact interaction, either non-adhesive or adhesive. The discussion will incorporate a few model examples that are relevant for the nanoscale mechanics investigated by intermittent contact resonance AFM (ICR-AFM) on low-k dielectric fins of high-aspect-ratio. In such ICR-AFM measurements, distinct dependence of the contact stiffness was observed as a function of the applied force and distance from the edges of the fins. These dependences were correctly predicted by the model and used to retrieve the mechanical changes undergone by fins during fabrication and processing.

Keywords

Nanoscale contact mechanics Edge compliance Conjugate gradient method Contact resonance atomic force microscopy 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Sneddon IN (1965) The relationship between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Engng Sci 3:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doerner MF, Nix WD (1986) A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments. J Mater Res 1(4):601–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation measurements. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asif SAS, Wahl KJ, Colton RJ (1999) Nanoindentation and contact stiffness measurement using force modulation with a capacitive load-displacement transducer. Rev Sci Instrum 70(5):2408–2413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burnham NA, Colton RJ (1989) Measuring the nanomechanical properties and surface forces of materials using an atomic force microscope. J Vac Sci Technol A 7:2906–2913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maivald P, Butt HJ, Gould SAC, Prater CB, Drake B, Guriey JA, Elings VB, Hansma PK (1991) Using force modulation to image surface elasticities with the atomic force microscope. Nanotechnology 2:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rabe U, Janser K, Arnold W (1996) Vibrations of free and surface-coupled atomic force microscope cantilevers: theory and experiment. Rev Sci Instrum 67:3281–3293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pittenger B, Erina N, Su C (2010) Quantitative mechanical property mapping at the nanoscale with PeakForce QNM Bruker Application Note AN128Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hertz H (1881) Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. J Reine Angew Math 92:156–171zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson KL, Kendall K, Roberts AD (1971) Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc Roy Soc London A 324:301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Derjaguin BV, Muller VM, Toporov YP (1975) Effect of contact on the adhesion of particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 53:314–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stan G, Mays E, Yoo HJ, King SW (2016) Nanoscale tomographic reconstruction of the subsurface mechanical properties of low-k high-aspect ratio patterns. Nanotechnology 27:485706 (9pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stan G, Gates RS (2014) Intermittent contact resonance atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 25:245702 (8pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maex K, Baklanov MR, Shamiryan D, Iacopi F, Brongersma SH, Yanovitskaya ZS (2003) Low dielectric constant materials for microelectronics. J Appl Phys 93:8793–8841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baklanov MR, de Marneffe JF, Shamiryan D, Urbanowicz AM, Shi H, Rakhimova TV, Huang H, Ho PS (2013) Plasma processing of low-k dielectrics. J Appl Phys 113:041101 (41 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vanstreels K, Wu C, Baklanov MR (2015) Mechanical stability of porous low-k dielectrics. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 4:N3058–N3064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stan G, Gates RS, Hu Kjoller QK, Prater C, Singh KJ, Mays E, King SW (2017) Relationships between chemical structure, mechanical properties and materials processing in nanopatterned organosilicate fins. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 8:863–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanson MT, Keer LM (1991) Analysis of edge effects on rail-wheel contact. Wear 144:39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu CC, Keer LM (1996) Edge effect on elastic-plastic rolling/sliding contacts. Comput Mech 18:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hetenyi M (1970) A general solution for the elastic quarter space. Am Soc Mech Eng 37E:7076zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Love AEH (1929) The stress produced in a semi-infinite solid by pressure on part of the boundary. Philos Trans R Soc London A 228:377–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Keer LM, Lee JC, Mura T (1983) Hetenyi’s elastic quarter space problem revisited. Int J Solids Structures 19:497–508MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Armani N, Keer LM, Mura T (1983) Non-Hertzian contact stress analysis for an elastic half-space-normal and sliding contact. Int J Solids Structures 19:357–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Keer LM, Lee JC, Mura T (1984) A contact problem for the elastic quarter space. Int J Solids Structures 20:513–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hanson MT, Keer LM (1990) A simplified analysis for an elastic quarter-space. Quart J Mech Appl Math 43:561–588MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang ZM, Wang W, Wong PL (2013) An explicit solution for the elastic quarter-space problem in matrix formulation. Int J Solids Structures 50:976–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang H, Wang W, Zhang S, Zhao Z (2016) Modeling of finite-length line contact problem with consideration of two free-end surfaces. J Tribology 138:021402–021410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stan G The effect of edge compliance on the adhesive contact between a spherical indenter and a quarter-space. (to be submitted)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maugis D (1992) Adhesion of spheres: the JKR-DMT transition using the Dugdale model. J Colloid Interface Sci 150:243–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stan G, Solares SD, Pittenger B, Erina N, Su C (2014) Nanoscale mechanics by tomographic contact resonance atomic force microscopy. Nanoscale 6:962–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stan G, Gates RS, Kavuri P, Torres J, Michalak D, Ege C, Bielefeld J, King SW (2014) Mechanical property changes in porous low-k dielectric thin films during processing. Appl Phys Lett 105:152906 (4 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bazrafshan M, de Rooij MB, Valefi M, Schipper DJ (2017) Numerical method for the adhesive normal contact analysis based on a Dugdale approximation. Tribol Int 112:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rey V, Anciaux G, Molinari JF (2017) Normal adhesive contact on rough surfaces: efficient algorithm for FFT-based BEM resolution. Comput Mech 60:69–81MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chawla JS, Singh KJ, Michalak DJ, Schenker R, Jezewski C, Krist B, Gstrein F, Indukuri TK, Yoo HJ (2014) Patterning challenges in the fabrication of 12 nm half-pitch dual damascene copper ultra low-k interconnects. Proc SPIE 9054:905404–905408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bailey S, Mays E, Michalak DJ, Chebiam R, King S, Sooryakumar R (2013) Mechanical properties of high porosity low-k dielectric nano-films determined by Brillouin light scattering. J Phys D Appl Phys 46:045308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu S, Wang Q, Liu G (2000) A versatile method of discrete convolution and FFT (DC-FFT) for contact analyses. Wear 243:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Polonsky IA, Keer LM (1999) A numerical method for solving rough contact problems based on the multi-level multi-summation and conjugate gradient techniques. Wear 231:206–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wolfram Research, Inc (2015) Mathematica, Version 10.3, Champaign, IL. http://www.wolfram.com
  40. 40.
    Jakes JE, Frihart CR, Beecher JF, Moon RJ, Resto PJ, Melgarejo ZH, Surez OM, Baumgart H, Elmustafa AA, Stone DS (2009) Nanoindentation near the edge. J Mater Res 24:1016–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jakes JE, Stone DS (2010) The edge effect in nanoindentation. Phil Mag 91:1387–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Material Measurement LaboratoryNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyGaithersburgUSA
  2. 2.Logic Technology DevelopmentIntel CorporationHillsboroUSA
  3. 3.Components ResearchIntel CorporationHillsboroUSA

Personalised recommendations