Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 58, Issue 7, pp 1181–1194 | Cite as

Evaluation of Volume Deformation from Surface DIC Measurement

  • M. RossiEmail author
  • L. Cortese
  • K. Genovese
  • A. Lattanzi
  • F. Nalli
  • F. Pierron
Article

Abstract

Stereo-DIC allows to track with a high accuracy the shape change and the surface displacement field of objects during deformation processes. When multiple camera arrangements are used, the shape and deformation measurement can be performed over the whole surface of the object. We submit that, in the case of intact specimens, with no internal defects and/or discontinuities, such boundary information can be used to estimate the internal displacement field by using proper interpolation functions. This calculation could serve, for instance, to evaluate the strain localization that occurs in metal specimens subjected to plastic deformation, hence allowing to get a better insight in the necking initiation and fracture propagation processes. In this paper, an interpolation method based on Bézier curves is developed and tested using simulated and real experiments on specimens with flat and cylindrical geometries. In particular, the deformation behaviour in the necking zone was investigated in the case of highly ductile and anisotropic materials. Numerical models were used to validate the method while the application to two real experiments demonstrated its feasibility in practical cases. The applicability of the method to more complex loading cases (e.g., bending, torsion, mixed-loads) or different initial shapes (e.g., curved beams, notches) will be investigated in future studies.

Keywords

Stereo-DIC Large deformation 3D volume reconstruction Necking Bézier curves 

References

  1. 1.
    Grédiac M, Hild F (2012) Full-field measurements and identification in solid mechanics. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sutton MA, Orteu J-J, Schreier HW (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amodio D, Broggiato G B, Campana F, Newaz G M (2003) Digital speckle correlation for strain measurement by image analysis. Exp Mech 43(4):396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faugeras O (1993) Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tvergaard V (1993) Necking in tensile bars with rectangular cross-section. Comput Methods Appl Mech 103 (1–2):273–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nichols FA (1980) Plastic instabilities and uniaxial tensile ductilities. Acta Metall Mater 28(6):663–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cortese L, Coppola T, Campanelli F, Campana F, Sasso M (2014) Prediction of ductile failure in materials for onshore and offshore pipeline applications. Int J Damage Mech 23(1):104–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2008) A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and lode dependence. Int J Plast 24(6):1071–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooreman S, Lecompte D, Sol H, Vantomme J, Debruyne D (2008) Identification of mechanical material behavior through inverse modeling and dic. Exp Mech 48(4):421–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kajberg J, Lindkvist G (2004) Characterisation of materials subjected to large strains by inverse modelling based on in-plane displacement fields. Int J Solids Struct 41:3439–3459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Needleman A (1988) Material rate dependence and mesh sensitivity in localization problems. Comput Method Appl M 67(1):69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grédiac M, Pierron F (2006) Applying the virtual fields method to the identification of elasto-plastic constitutive parameters. Int J Plast 22:602–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim J-H, Serpantié A, Barlat F, Pierron F, Lee M-G (2013) Characterization of the post-necking strain hardening behavior using the virtual fields method. Int J Solids Struct 50(24):3829–3842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pierron F, Grédiac M (2012) The virtual fields method. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rossi M, Pierron F (2012) Identification of plastic constitutive parameters at large deformations from three dimensional displacement fields. Comput Mech 49:53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bay B K, Smith T S, Fyhrie D P, Saad M (1999) Digital volume correlation: three-dimensional strain mapping using X-ray tomography. Exp Mech 39(3):217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith T S, Bay B K, Rashid M M (2002) Digital volume correlation including rotational degrees of freedom during minimization. Exp Mech 42(3):272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gates M, Lambros J, Heath MT (2011) Towards high performance digital volume correlation. Exp Mech 51(4):491–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Franck C, Hong S, Maskarinec SA, Tirrell DA, Ravichandran G (2007) Three-dimensional full-field measurements of large deformations in soft materials using confocal microscopy and digital volume correlation. Exp Mech 47(3):427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Germaneau A, Doumalin P, Dupré J-C (2007) 3D strain field measurement by correlation of volume images using scattered light: recording of images and choice of marks. Strain 43(3):207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roux S, Hild F, Viot P, Bernard D (2008) Three-dimensional image correlation from x-ray computed tomography of solid foam. Compos Part A-Appl S 39(8):1253–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Atay S M, Kroenke C D, Sabet A, Bayly P V (2008) Measurement of the dynamic shear modulus of mouse brain tissue in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography. J Biomech Eng 130(2):021013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rossi M, Pierron F (2012) Identification of the plastic behaviour in the post-necking regime using a three dimensional reconstruction technique. Key Eng Mater 504:703–708. Trans Tech PublCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dufour J-E, Hild F, Roux S (2015) Shape, displacement and mechanical properties from isogeometric multiview stereocorrelation. J Strain Anal Eng 50(7):470–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang Y, Lava P, Coppieters S, Houtte PV, Debruyne D (2013) Application of a multi-camera stereo DIC set-up to assess strain fields in an Erichsen test: methodology and validation. Strain 49(2):190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Orteu J-J, Bugarin F, Harvent J, Robert L, Velay V (2011) Multiple-camera instrumentation of a single point incremental forming process pilot for shape and 3D displacement measurements: methodology and results. Exp Mech 51(4):625–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heuer F, Schmidt H, Wilke H-J (2008) The relation between intervertebral disc bulging and annular fiber associated strains for simple and complex loading. J Biomech 41(5):1086–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spera D, Genovese K, Voloshin A (2011) Application of stereo-digital image correlation to full-field 3-D deformation measurement of intervertebral disc. Strain 47(s1):e572–e587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Genovese K, Cortese L, Rossi M, Amodio D (2016) A 360-deg digital image correlation system for materials testing. Opt Laser Eng 82:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Asundi A K, Chan C-S, Marokkey S R (1994) 360-deg profilometry: new techniques for display and acquisition. Opt Eng 33(8):2760–2769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guo H, Chen M (2003) Multiview connection technique for 360-deg three-dimensional measurement. Opt Eng 42(4):900– 905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Badel P, Genovese K, Avril S (2012) 3D residual stress field in arteries: Novel inverse method based on optical full-field measurements. Strain 48(6):528–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sasso M, Rossi M, Chiappini G, Palmieri G (2009) Sheet metals testing with combined fringe projection and digital image correlation. In: Proceedings of the 2009 SEM annual conference, vol 182Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nguyen T N, Huntley J M, Burguete R L, Coggrave C R (2012) Multiple-view shape and deformation measurement by combining fringe projection and digital image correlation. Strain 48(3):256–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bridgman P W (1952) Studies in large plastic flow and fracture, vol 177. McGraw-Hill, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mirone G (2004) A new model for the elastoplastic characterization and the stress-strain determination on the necking section of a tensile specimen. Int J Solids Struct 41(13):3545–3564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beder C, Förstner W (2006) Direct solutions for computing cylinders from minimal sets of 3D points. Comput Vis–ECCV 2006:135–146Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc A-Math Phys 193:281–297MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cortese L, Nalli F, Rossi M (2016) A nonlinear model for ductile damage accumulation under multiaxial non-proportional loading conditions. Int J Plast 85:77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Badaloni M, Rossi M, Chiappini G, Lava P, Debruyne D (2015) Impact of experimental uncertainties on the identification of mechanical material properties using DIC. Exp Mech 55(8):1411–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rossi M, Lava P, Pierron F, Debruyne D, Sasso M (2015) Effect of DIC spatial resolution, noise and interpolation error on identification results with the VFM. Strain 51(3):206–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringSapienza University of RomeRomaItaly
  3. 3.School of EngineeringUniversity of BasilicataPotenzaItaly
  4. 4.Faculty of Science and TechnologyFree University of Bozen - BolzanoBolzanoItaly
  5. 5.Engineering and the EnvironmentUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations