Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 56, Issue 7, pp 1133–1153 | Cite as

Experimental Investigation on Lateral Impact Response of Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Tube Columns Using Horizontal-Impact-Testing System

  • S. AghdamyEmail author
  • D. P. Thambiratnam
  • M. Dhanasekar
Article

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation on the lateral impact performance of axially loaded concrete-filled double-skin tube (CFDST) columns. These columns have desirable structural and constructional properties and have been used as columns in building, legs of off shore platforms and as bridge piers. Since they could be vulnerable to impact from passing vessels or vehicles, it is necessary to understand their behaviour under lateral impact loads. With this in mind, an experimental method employing an innovative instrumented horizontal impact testing system (HITS) was developed to apply lateral impact loads whilst the column maintained a static axial pre-loading to examine the failure mechanism and key response parameters of the column. These included the time histories of impact force, reaction forces, global lateral deflection and permanent local buckling profile. Eight full scale columns were tested for key parameters including the axial load level and impact location. Based on the test data, the failure mode, peak impact force, impact duration, peak reaction forces, reaction force duration, column maximum and residual global deflections and column local buckling length, depth and width under varying conditions are analysed and discussed. It is evident that the innovative HITS can successfully test structural columns under the combination of axial pre-loading and impact loading. The findings on the lateral impact response of the CFDST columns can serve as a benchmark reference for their future analysis and design.

Keywords

Experimental testing Lateral impact Concrete-filled double-skin tube (CFDST) Horizontal impact testing system Axial pre-loading 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr. Anthony Morris and Mr. Mark Hayne for their continuous support in the experimental work. They also like to thank One Steel Mill Tube (Australia), HY-TEC concrete and Sika (Australia) for supporting this research by supplying the steel tubes, concrete and adhesive mortar, respectively.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(AVI 2849 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Wei S, Mau ST, Vipulanandan C, Mantrala SK (1995) Performance of new sandwich tube under axial loading. J Struct Eng 121(12):1814–1821Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yagishita F, Kitoh H, Sugimoto M et al. (2000) Double skin composite tubular columns subjected to cyclic horizontal force and constant axial force. Composite Hybrid Struct:497–503Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li W, Han LH, Zhao XL et al. (2012) Axial strength of concrete-filled double skin steel tubular (CFDST) columns with preload on steel tubes. Thin-Walled Struct 56 (9)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corbett G, Reid S, Al-Hassani S (1990) Resistance of steel-concrete sandwich tubes to penetration. Int J Impact Eng 9(2):191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li XH, Lei JP, Wang R (2013) Finite element analysis of concrete-filled double skin steel tubes with simply supported under lateral impact. Appl Mech Mater 405:1106–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Y, Qian X, Liew JR, Zhang M-H (2014) Experimental behavior of cement filled pipe-in-pipe composite structures under transverse impact. Int J Impact Eng 72:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson GR (2001) Experimental and numerical investigation into impact bending collapse of rectangular hollow sections. University of Technology, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crupi V, Montanini R (2007) Aluminium foam sandwiches collapse modes under static and dynamic three-point bending. Int J Impact Eng 34(3):509–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hanssen A, Enstock L, Langseth M (2002) Close-range blast loading of aluminium foam panels. Int J Impact Eng 27(6):593–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Banthia N, Mindess S, Bentur A (1987) Impact behaviour of concrete beams. Mater Struct 20(4):293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Banthia N, Mindess S, Bentur A, Pigeon M (1989) Impact testing of concrete using a drop-weight impact machine. Exp Mech 29(1):63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang X, Ruiz G, Yu RC (2010) A new drop‐weight impact machine for studying fracture processes in structural concrete. Strain 46(3):252–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang X, Ruiz G, Yu RC (2008) Experimental study of combined size and strain rate effects on the fracture of reinforced concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 20(8):544–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liew JR, Sohel K, Koh C (2009) Impact tests on steel–concrete–steel sandwich beams with lightweight concrete core. Eng Struct 31(9):2045–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kishi N, Mikami H, Matsuoka K, Ando T (2002) Impact behavior of shear-failure-type RC beams without shear rebar. Int J Impact Eng 27(9):955–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    May IM, Chen Y, Owen DRJ, Feng Y, Thiele PJ (2006) Reinforced concrete beams under drop-weight impact loads. Comput Concr 3((2_3)):79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hobbs B, Gilbert M, Molyneaux T et al. (1998) Effects of vehicle impact loading on masonry arch parapets. In: Arch bridges: history, analysis, assessment, maintenance and repair. Proc Second Int Arch Bridge ConfGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zeinoddini M, Parke G, Harding J (2002) Axially pre-loaded steel tubes subjected to lateral impacts: an experimental study. Int J Impact Eng 27(6):669–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Allan J, Marshall J (1992) The effect of ship impact on the load carrying capacity of steel tubes. HM Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yousuf M, Uy B, Tao Z, Remennikov A, Liew JR (2014) Impact behaviour of pre-compressed hollow and concrete filled mild and stainless steel columns. J Constr Steel Res 96:54–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    AS1391 (2007) Metallic materials–tensile testing at ambient temperature. Standards Australia, North SydneyGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    AS1012.9 (1999) Methods of testing concrete-determination of the compressive strength of concrete specimens. Standards Australia, North SydneyGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Han LH, Hou CC, Zhao XL, Rasmussen KJR (2014) Behaviour of high-strength concrete filled steel tubes under transverse impact loading. J Constr Steel Res 92:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Aghdamy
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. P. Thambiratnam
    • 1
  • M. Dhanasekar
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and Built EnvironmentQueensland University of Technology (QUT)BrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations