The random errors of subset-based digital image correlation due to the use of matched or overmatched shape functions are investigated. Governing formulations that can quantitatively predict these random errors are derived. Theoretical results reveal that all these random errors are in linear proportion to the noise level of the speckle images and inverse proportion to the sum of square of subset intensity gradients of the interrogated subsets. However, for matched or overmatched cases, zero-order and first-order shape functions give rise to the same magnitude of random errors, while the random errors induced by second-order shape functions are approximately twice that resulted from the regularly used first-order shape functions. The correctness of the derived theoretical formulations is verified using numerical tests, and also shows good accordance with previously reported experimental results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Pan B, Qian K, Xie H, Asundi A (2009) Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas Sci Technol 20(6):062001
Pan B (2011) Recent progress in digital image correlation. Exp Mech 51:1223–1235
Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier H (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements: basic concepts, theory and applications. Springer, New York
Pan B, Wang B, Lubineau G, Moussawi A (2015) Comparison of subset-based local and finite-element based global digital image correlation. Exp Mech 55(5):887–901
Bruck HA, McNeill SR, Sutton MA et al (1989) Digital image correlation using Newton–Raphson method of partial differential correction. Exp Mech 29(3):261–267
Pan B, Li K (2011) A fast digital image correlation method for deformation measurement. Opt Lasers Eng 49(7):841–847
Pan B, Li K, Tong W (2013) Fast, robust and accurate DIC calculation without redundant computations. Exp Mech 53(7):1277–1289
Pan B, Tian L (2015) Superfast robust digital image correlation analysis using parallel computing. Opt Eng 54(3):034106
Lu H, Cary PD (2000) Deformation measurements by digital image correlation: implementation of a second-order displacement gradient. Exp Mech 40(4):393–400
Gao Y, Cheng T, Su Y et al (2014) High-efficiency and high-accuracy digital image correlation for three-dimensional measurement. Opt Lasers Eng 65:73–80
Bornert M, Brémand F, Doumalin P et al (2009) Assessment of digital image correlation measurement errors: methodology and results. Exp Mech 49(3):353–370
Valle V, Hedan S, Cosenza P, Fauchille AL, Berdjane M (2015) Digital image correlation development for the study of materials including multiple crossing cracks. Exp Mech 55(2):379–391
Schreier HW, Sutton MA (2002) Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions. Exp Mech 42(3):303–310
Yaofeng S, Pang JHL (2007) Study of optimal subset size in digital image correlation of speckle pattern images. Opt Lasers Eng 45(9):967–974
Gates M, Gonzalez J, Lambros J et al (2014) Subset refinement for digital volume correlation: numerical and experimental applications. Exp Mech 55(1):245–259
Yu L, Pan B (2015) The errors in digital image correlation due to overmatched shape functions. Meas Sci Technol 26(4):045202
Wang ZY, Li HQ, Tong JW, Ruan JT (2007) Statistical analysis of the effect of intensity pattern noise on the displacement measurement precision of digital image correlation using self-correlated images. Exp Mech 47(5):701–707
Pan B, Xie H, Wang Z et al (2008) Study on subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. Opt Express 16(10):7037–7048
Wang YQ, Sutton MA, Bruck HA et al (2009) Quantitative error assessment in pattern matching: effects of intensity pattern noise, interpolation, strain and image contrast on motion measurements. Strain 45(2):160–178
Pan B, Lu Z, Xie H (2010) Mean intensity gradient: an effective global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 48(4):469–477
Schreier HW, Braasch JR, Sutton MA (2000) Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation. Opt Eng 9(11):2915–2921
Luu L, Wang Z, Vo M, Hoang T, Ma J (2011) Accuracy enhancement of digital image correlation with B-spline interpolation. Opt Lett 36:3070–3072
Pan B (2013) Bias error reduction of digital image correlation using Gaussian pre-filtering. Opt Lasers Eng 51(10):1161–1167
Pan B, Xie HM, Xu BQ, Dai FL (2006) Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation. Meas Sci Technol 17(6):1615
Reu PL (2011) Experimental and numerical methods for exact subpixel shifting. Exp Mech 51(4):443–452
Wolberg G, Sueyllam HM, Ismail MA et al (2000) One-dimensional resampling with inverse and forward mapping functions. J Graph Tools 5(3):11–33
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 11272032, 11322220, and 11427802), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant no. NCET-12-0023), the Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy (Grant no. KF14032) and Beijing Nova Program (xx2014B034).
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, B., Pan, B. Random Errors in Digital Image Correlation Due to Matched or Overmatched Shape Functions. Exp Mech 55, 1717–1727 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0080-7
- Digital image correlation
- Pattern matching
- Shape function
- Random error