Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 27–40 | Cite as

A New Methodology for Scaling the Mechanics of Pin-reinforcement in Composite Sandwich Structures under Compression using Digital Image Correlation

Article

Abstract

There is a great deal of interest in understanding the mechanics in pin-reinforced composite sandwich structures. In particular, characterizing the relationship of the mechanics in smaller to larger specimens due to changes in the pin response can expedite the development of more advanced models, as well as the assessment of new materials and processing conditions. In this investigation, specimens with a conventional symmetric pin configuration anchoring into each facesheet have been experimentally characterized under compressive loading. The effect of specimen size on the compressive response has been investigated through the number of active pins under loading. The stress–strain response of these structures exhibit initially high compressive stiffness followed by a significant load shedding and flow stress. The transition in the mechanical behavior is attributed to the failure of reinforced pins under a combination of axial compression and transverse bending due to their orientation relative to the facesheets. As the size of a specimen is decreased, the effective stiffness and strength decrease due to a decrease in effective pin stiffness. It was found that these effects on the compressive stress can be scaled through a stress scaling factor derived from the change in the structure of the specimen due to the number of active versus inactive pins per unit of area, which is scaled by the pin density related to the pin basis and spacing for the corresponding pin configuration. Using Digital Image Correlation (DIC), it was then possible to account for these size effects on compressive strain directly through the pin deformations. A stiffness scaling factor could then be determined from a model of a beam in bending under axial and transverse loading that was correlated to the DIC displacements to determine the effective pin stiffness and corresponding stiffness scaling factor for strains. A stretched exponential relationship was also found to describe the scaling of the effective pin stiffness with the number of active pins. The compressive stress–strain response was then corrected to show that similar scaled properties could be obtained for the compressive modulus. The Poisson’s ratio was also obtained from the DIC strains averaged over the full specimen, and a scaling relation similar to that for the effective pin stiffness was developed.

Keywords

X-Cor Compression Digital image correlation Size effect Scaling relations Composite sandwich structures 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge support from NAWCAD in Pax River, MD through cooperative agreement N00421-98-H-1116 with the University of Maryland.

References

  1. 1.
    Sliseris J, Rocens K (2013) Optimal design of composite plates with discrete variable stiffness. Compos Struct 98:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mouritz AP (2006) Compression properties of z-pinned sandwich composites. J Mater Sci 41:5771–5774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kooistra GW, Queheillalt DT, Wadley HNG (2004) Compressive behavior of age hardenable tetrahedral lattice truss structures made from aluminum. Acta Mater 52(14):4229–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hohe J, Beschorner C, Becker W (1999) Effective elastic properties of hexagonal and quadrilateral grid structures. Compos Struct 46:73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Queheillalt DT, Wadley HNG (2005) Pyramidal lattice truss structures with hollow trusses. Mater Sci Eng A 397:132–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biagi R, Smith HB (2007) Imperfection sensitivity of pyramidal core sandwich structures. Int J Solids Struct 44:4690–706CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carstensen TC, Kunkel E, Magee C (2001) X-Cor advanced sandwich core material. In: 33rd International SAMPE Technical Conference, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cartié DDR, Fleck NA (2003) The effect of pin reinforcement upon the through-thickness compressive strength of foam-cored sandwich panels. Compos Sci Technol 63(16):2401–2409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rice MC, Fleischer CA, Zupan M (2006) Study on the collapse of Pin-reinforced foam sandwich panel cores. Exp Mech 46:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nanayakkara A, Feih S, Mouritz AP (2011) Experimental analysis of the through-thickness compression properties of z-pinned sandwich composites. Composites Part A. Appl Sci Manuf 42(11):1673–1680Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marasco AI, Cartié DDR, Partridge IK, Rezai A (2006) Mechanical properties balance in novel Z-pinned sandwich panels: Out-of-plane properties. Composites Part A. Appl Sci Manuf 37(2):295–302Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xiong J, Ma L, Wu L, Liu J, Vaziri A (2011) Mechanical behavior and failure of composite pyramidal truss core sandwich columns. Compos Part B 42:938–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baral N, Cartié DDR, Partridge IK, Baley C, Davies P (2010) Improved impact performance of marine sandwich panels using through-thickness reinforcement: experimental results. Compos Part B 41(2):117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nanayakkara A, Feih S, Mouritz AP (2012) Experimental impact damage study of z-pinned sandwich composites. J Sandw Struct Mater 14:469–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Partridge IK, Cartié DDR (2005) Delamination resistant laminates by Z-fiber® pinning Part I manufacture and fracture performance, composites Part A. Appl Sci Manuf 35:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Brien TK, Paris IL (2002) Exploratory investigation of failure mechanisms in transition regions between solid laminates and X-Cor® truss sandwich. Compos Struct 57(1–4):189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haldar S, Gheewala N, Grande-Allen J, Sutton MA, Bruck HA (2011) Multiscale mechanical characterization of palmetto wood for biologically-inspired polymer composites. Exp Mech 51(4):575–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haldar S, Bruck HA (2013) Characterization of dynamic damage mechanisms in palmetto wood as biological inspiration for impact resistant polymer composites. Mech Mater 57:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jin H, Haldar S, Bruck HA, Lu WY (2011) Grid method for microscale discontinuous deformation measurement. Exp Mech 51(4):565–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jin H, Lu WY, Haldar S, Bruck HA (2011) Microscale characterization of granular deformation near a crack tip. J Mater Sci 46(20):6596–6602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haldar S, Bruck HA (2014) Mechanics of composite sandwich structures with bioinspired core. Compos Sci Technol 95:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gershon AL, Cole DP, Kota AK, Bruck HA (2010) Nanomechanical characterization of dispersion and its effects in nano-enhanced polymers and polymer composites. J Mater Sci 45:6353–6364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Virakthi A, Lee S, Haldar S, Bruck H, Rahman A (2013) Modeling of pin-facesheet interactions in K-cor sandwich structures under compressive loading, 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Boston, MA , doi: 10.2514/MSDM13Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raymond R, Young W (1975) Formulas for Stress and Strain. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations