A Study of the Influence of Calibration Uncertainty on the Global Uncertainty for Digital Image Correlation Using a Monte Carlo Approach
- 672 Downloads
Stereo digital image correlation (DIC) is now a standard measurement technique. It is, therefore, important to quantify the measurement uncertainties when using it for experiments. Because of the complexity of the DIC measurement process, a Monte Carlo approach is presented as a method to discover the magnitude of the stereo-DIC calibration uncertainty. Then, the calibration errors, along with an assumed sensor position error, are propagated through the stereo-triangulation process to find the uncertainty in three-dimensional position and object motion. Details on the statistical results of the calibration parameters are presented, with estimated errors for different calibration targets and calibration image quality. A sensitivity study was done to look at the influence of the different calibration error sources. Details on the best approach for propagating the errors from a statistical perspective are discussed, including the importance of using a “boot-strap” approach for error propagation because of the covariance of many of the calibration parameters. The calibration and error propagation results are then interpreted to provide some best-practices guidelines for DIC.
KeywordsDigital image correlation DIC Full-field measurements Uncertainty quantification Optical methods Measurement techniques
The help of Stephanie Fitchett for her many discussions regarding statistics and the Monte Carlo method are greatly appreciated. For help understanding DIC and photogrammetry I would like to thank Tim Miller and Hubert Schreier.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
- 3.Lava P et al. Assessment of measuring errors in DIC using deformation fields generated by plastic FEA. Opt Lasers Eng 47(7–8):747–753Google Scholar
- 7.Siebert T et al. (2007) High-speed digital image correlation: error estimations and applications. Opt Eng 46(5)Google Scholar
- 9.Nansteel MW, Chen CCT (2009) Digital image correlation: a measurement tool for the study of explosive effects. 2009 Ieee Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security pp 226–233Google Scholar
- 14.BIPM (2009) Evaluation of measurement data—supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”—propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. JCGM 101:2008Google Scholar
- 17.BIPM (2008) Evaluation of measurement data—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008Google Scholar
- 18.Sutton DA, Orteu JJ, Schreier HW (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar