Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 52, Issue 9, pp 1407–1421 | Cite as

Optimization of Digital Image Correlation for High-Resolution Strain Mapping of Ceramic Composites

  • V. P. Rajan
  • M. N. Rossol
  • F. W. ZokEmail author
Article

Abstract

Digital image correlation (DIC) is assessed as a tool for measuring strains with high spatial resolution in woven-fiber ceramic matrix composites. Using results of mechanical tests on aluminum alloy specimens in various geometric configurations, guidelines are provided for selecting DIC test parameters to maximize the extent of correlation and to minimize errors in displacements and strains. The latter error is shown to be exacerbated by the presence of strain gradients. In a case study, the resulting guidelines are applied to the measurement of strain fields in a SiC/SiC composite comprising 2-D woven fiber. Sub-fiber tow resolution of strain and low strain error are achieved. The fiber weave architecture is seen to exert a significant influence over strain heterogeneity within the composite. Moreover, strain concentrations at tow crossovers lead to the formation of macroscopic cracks in adjacent longitudinal tows. Such cracks initially grow stably, subject to increasing app lied stress, but ultimately lead to composite rupture. Once cracking is evident, the composite response is couched in terms of displacements, since the computed strains lack physical meaning in the vicinity of cracks. DIC is used to identify the locations of these cracks (via displacement discontinuities) and to measure the crack opening displacement profiles as a function of applied stress.

Keywords

3-D digital image correlation Woven-fiber ceramic-matrix composites Spatial resolution  Strain error Crack opening displacement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Pratt & Whitney Center of Excellence at the University of California, Santa Barbara (monitored by Douglas Berczik), and the US AFOSR (Ali Sayir) and NASA (Anthony Calomino) under the National Hypersonics Science Center for Materials and Structures (AFOSR Prime Contract No. FA9550-09-1-0477 to Teledyne Scientific and Sub-contract No. B9U538772 to UCSB). The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Renaud Rinaldi with the finite element analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Sutton M, McNeill S, Helm J, Chao Y (2000) Advances in two-dimensional and three-dimensional computer vision. Photomechanics 77:323–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sutton MA, Orteu J-J, Schreier HW (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion, and deformation measurements. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schreier HW, Sutton MA (2002) Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions. Exp Mech 42(3):303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ke X-D, Schreier HW, Sutton MA, Wang YQ (2011) Error assessment in stereo-based deformation measurements, Part II: experimental validation of uncertainty and bias estimates. Exp Mech 51(4):423–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cox BN, Flanagan G (1997) Handbook of analytical methods for textile composites. NASA Contractor Report 4750Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Novak MD, Zok FW (2011) High-temperature materials testing with full-field strain measurement: experimental design and practice. Rev Sci Instrum 82(11):115101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bisagni C, Walters C (2008) Experimental investigation of the damage propagation in composite specimens under biaxial loading. Compos Struct 85(4):293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kazemahvazi S, Kiele J, Zenkert D (2010) Tensile strength of UD-composite laminates with multiple holes. Compos Sci Tech 70(8):1280–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lagattu F, Brillaud J, Lafarie-Frenot M-C (2004) High strain gradient measurements by using digital image correlation technique. Mater Charact 53(1):17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fuchs PF, Major Z (2010) Experimental determination of cohesive zone models for epoxy composites. Exp Mech 51(5):779–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramault C, Makris A, Van Hemelrijck D, Lamkanfi E, Van Paepegem WS (2010) Comparison of different techniques for strain monitoring of a biaxially loaded cruciform specimen. Strain 47(S2):210–217Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Orteu J-J, Cutard T, Garcia D, Cailleux E, Robert L (2007) Application of stereovision to the mechanical characterisation of ceramic refractories reinforced with metallic fibres. Strain 43(2):96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pankow M, Justusson B, Salvi A, Waas AM, Yen C-F, Ghiorse S (2011) Shock response of 3D woven composites: an experimental investigation. Compos Struct 93(5):1337–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daggumati S, Voet E, Van Paepegem W, Degrieck J, Xu J, Lomov SV, Verpoest I (2011) Local strain in a 5-harness satin weave composite under static tension: Part I — Experimental analysis. Compos Sci Tech 71(8):1171–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anzelotti G, Nicoletto G, Riva E (2008) Mesomechanic strain analysis of twill-weave composite lamina under unidirectional in-plane tension. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39(8):1294–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang Y-Q, Sutton MA, Ke X-D, Schreier HW, Reu PL, Miller TJ (2011) On error assessment in stereo-based deformation measurements, Part I: theoretical developments for quantitative estimates. Exp Mech 51(4):405–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robert L, Nazaret F, Cutard T, Orteu JJ (2007) Use of 3-D digital image correlation to characterize the mechanical behavior of a fiber reinforced refractory castable. Exp Mech 47(6):761–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bornert M, Brémand F, Doumalin P, Dupré J-C, Fazzini M, Grédiac M, Hild F, Mistou S, Molimard J, Orteu J-J, Robert L, Surrel Y, Vacher P, Wattrisse B (2009) Assessment of digital image correlation measurement errors: methodology and results. Exp Mech 49(3):353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Avril S, Bonnet M, Bretelle A-S, Grédiac M, Hild F, Ienny P, Latourte F, Lemosse D, Pagano S, Pagnacco E, Pierron F (2008) Overview of identification methods of mechanical parameters based on full-field measurements. Exp Mech 48(4):381–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Knauss WG, Huang Y, Chasiotis I (2003) Mechanical measurements at the micron and nanometer scales. Mech Mater 35(3–6):217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haddadi H, Belhabib S (2008) Use of rigid-body motion for the investigation and estimation of the measurement errors related to digital image correlation technique. Opt Lasers Eng 46(2):185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schreier HW, Braasch JR, Sutton MA (2000) Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation. Opt Eng 39(11):2915–2921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vic-3D (2007) ®Software. Correlated Solutions Incorporated, Columbia, SC. http://www.correlatedsolutions.com
  24. 24.
    Nicoletto G, Anzelotti G, Riva E (2009) Mesoscopic strain fields in woven composites: experiments vs. finite element modeling. Opt Lasers Eng 47(3–4):352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rubin DM (2004) A simple autocorrelation algorithm for determining grain size from digital images of sediment. J Sediment Res 74(1):160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lecompte D, Smits A, Bossuyt S, Sol H, Vantomme J, Van Hemelrijck D, Habraken AM (2006) Quality assessment of speckle patterns for digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 44(11):1132–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rasband WS (1997–2011) ImageJ, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
  28. 28.
    Sutton MA, Yan J, Deng X, Cheng C-S, Zavattieri P (2007) Three-dimensional digital image correlation to quantify deformation and crack-opening displacement in ductile aluminum under mixed-mode I/III loading. Opt Eng 46(5):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    González C, Llorca J (2005) Stiffness of a curved beam subjected to axial load and large displacements. Int J Solids Struct 42(5–6):1537–1545zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bao G, Suo Z (1992) Remarks on crack-bridging concepts. Appl Mech Rev 45(8):355-366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations