Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 289–303 | Cite as

Current Trends and Future Directions in MEMS

  • R. J. Pryputniewicz
Murray Lecture

Abstract

Demands for microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) (also known as microsystems technology, or MST) are continuously growing and it is predicted that they will continue to grow for, at least, a few more decades. For example, MEMS based products produced in 2005 had a value of $8 billion, 40% of which was in sensors. The balance was for products that included micromachined features, such as ink jet print heads, catheters, and RF IC chips with embedded inductors. Growth projections follow a rapidly increasing curve, with the value of products rising to $40 billion in 2015 and $200 billion in 2025! Growth to date has come from a combination of technology displacement, as exemplified by automotive pressure sensors and airbag accelerometers, new products, such as miniaturized guidance systems, and MEMS RF devices. Much of the growth in MEMS business is expected to come from products that are in early stages of development or yet to be invented. Some of these products include disposable chips for performing assays on blood and tissue samples, which are now performed in hospital laboratories, integrated optical switching and processing chips, as well as various RF communication and remote sensing products. In particular, MEMS are found uniquely suitable for detection, analysis, and mitigation of damage as well as for new, very capable, devices that are being developed and will become available in the future. This paper addresses development of representative MEMS of contemporary interest and illustrates their use in applications relating to daily life as well as to some of the most challenging tasks in today’s experimental mechanics.

Keywords

MEMS Sensors Experimental micromechanics Applications Future economic benefit 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges support by all sponsors and thanks them for their permissions to present the results, of their projects, in this paper. This work was also supported by the NEST Program at WPI-ME/CHSLT.

References

  1. 1.
    Pryputniewicz RJ (2000) “Integrated approach to teaching of design, analysis, and characterization in micromechatronics.” Paper No. IMECE2000/DE-13, ASME—Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pryputniewicz RJ (2001) “MEMS design education by case studies.” Paper No. IMECE2001/DE-23292, ASME—Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pryputniewicz RJ (2007) Progress in MEMS. Strain 43:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pryputniewicz DR (1997) ACES approach to the development of microcomponents, MS Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pryputniewicz RJ (1994) A hybrid approach to deformation analysis. Proc SPIE 2342:282–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Furlong C, Pryputniewicz RJ (1998) Hybrid computational and experimental approach for the study and optimization of mechanical components. Opt Eng 37:1448–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Furlong C (1999) Hybrid, experimental and computational, approach for the efficient study and optimization of mechanical and electro-mechanical components, Ph.D. Dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pryputniewicz EJ (2000) ACES approach to the study of electrostatically driven MEMS microengines, MS Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pryputniewicz RJ, Galambos P, Brown GC, Furlong C, Pryputniewicz EJ (2001) ACES characterization of surface micromachined microfluidic devices. Int J Micro Electron Pack (IJMEP) 24:30–36Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pryputniewicz DR, Furlong C, Pryputniewicz RJ (2001) “ACES approach to the study of material properties of MEMS.” Proc. Internat. Symp. on MEMS: Mechanics and Measurements, Portland, OR, pp. 80–83Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pryputniewicz RJ, Furlong C (2002) MEMS and nanotechnology. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, WorcesterGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pryputniewicz RJ (1993) Engineering experimentation. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, WorcesterGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stout P (1999) “CFD-ACE+ a CAD system for simulation and modeling of MEMS.” Proc. SPIE, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilkerson PW, Kranz M, Przekwas AJ (2001) “Flip-chip hermetic packaging of RF MEMS.” MEMS4Conference, Berkeley, CA, August 24–26Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Przekwas AJ, Turowski M, Furmanczyk M, Hieke A, Pryputniewicz RJ (2001) “Multiphysics design and simulation environment for microelectromechanical systems.” Proc. Symp. on MEMS: Mechanics and Measurements, Portland, OR, pp. 84–89Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pryputniewicz RJ, Pryputniewicz DR, Pryputniewicz EJ (2007) “Effect of process parameters on TED-based Q-factor of MEMS.” Paper No. IPACK2007-33094, ASME—Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    CFDRC (2004) CFD-ACE + Multiphysics software, http://www.cfdrc.com
  18. 18.
    SRAC (1998) COSMOS/M user’s guide. Structural Research and Analysis Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pryputniewicz RJ, Wilkerson PW, Przekwas AJ, Furlong C (2002) “RF MEMS: modeling and simulation of switch dynamics.” Proc. 35th Internat. Symp. on Microelectronics, Denver, CO, pp. 267–272Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pryputniewicz RJ, Furlong C (2003) “Novel optoelectronic methodology for testing of MOEMS.” Proc. Internat. Symp. on MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems III, SPIE-4983: 11–25Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brown GC (1999) Laser interferometric methodologies for characterizing static and dynamic behavior of MEMS, Ph.D. Dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pryputniewicz RJ (1995) “Quantitative determination of displacements and strains from holograms.” Ch. 3 in Holographic interferometry, vol. 68 of Springer Series in Sciences, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 33–72Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pryputniewicz RJ (1981) High precision hologrammetry. Internat Arch Photogramm 24:377–386Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pryputniewicz EJ, Miller SL, deBoer MP, Brown GC, Biederman RR, Pryputniewicz RJ (2000) “Experimental and analytical characterization of dynamic effects in electrostatic microengines.” Proc. Internat. Symp. on Microscale Systems, Orlando, FL, pp. 80–83Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pryputniewicz RJ (1995) Hologram interferometry from silver halide to silicon and … beyond. Proc SPIE 2545:405–427Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pryputniewicz RJ, Shepherd E, Allen JJ, Furlong C (2003) “University—National Laboratory alliance for MEMS education.” Proc. 4th Internat. Symp. on MEMS and Nanotechnology (4th-ISMAN), Charlotte, NC, pp. 364–371Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brown GC, Pryputniewicz RJ (1998) Holographic microscope for measuring displacements of vibrating microbeams using time-average electro-optic holography. Opt Eng 37:1398–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Klempner AR, Hefti P, Marinis RT, Pryputniewicz RJ (2004) “Development of a high stability optoelectronic laser interferometric microscope for characterization and optimization of MEMS.” Proc. 15th Internat. Invitational UACEM Symp., Springfield, MA, pp. 275–285Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Klempner AR (2006) Development of a modular interferometric microscopy system for characterization of MEMS, MS Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marinis RT (2009) Development and implementation of automated interferometric microscope system for study of MEMS inertial sensors, Ph.D. Dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pryputniewicz RJ (2007) “Thermal management in RF MEMS Ohmic switches.” Paper No. IPACK2007-33502, ASME—Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Furlong C, Pryputniewicz RJ (2007) “Integrated approach to development of microelectronic contacts.” Paper No. IPACK2007-33345, ASME—Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pryputniewicz RJ, Marinis RT, Klempner AR, Hefti P (2006) “Hybrid methodology for development of MEMS.” Proc. IEEE-PLANS2006 San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kok R, Furlong C, Pryputniewicz RJ (2003) “Experimental modal analysis using MEMS accelerometers.” Proc. 30th Annual Symp. and Exhibition of IMAPS-NE, Boxboro, MA, pp. 116–123Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Marinis TF, Soucy JW, Hanson DS, Pryputniewicz RJ, Marinis RT, Klempner AR (2006) “Isolation of MEMS devices from package stresses by use of compliant metal interposers.” Proc. 56th IEEE Electronic Components & Technology Conf. (56th-IEEE-ECTC), paper No. P1S25-MEMS, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mihailovich RE, Kim M, Hacker JBH, Sovero A, Studer J, Higgins JA, DeNatale JF (2001) MEM relay for reconfigurable RF circuits. IEEE Microw Wireless Compon Lett 11:53–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pryputniewicz RJ, Marinis RT, Klempner AR, Hefti P (2007) “Novel optoelectronic methodology to facilitate development of MEMS.” Proc. 63rd Annual Meeting of the Institute of Navigation (ION), Cambridge, MA, pp. 203–212Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zunino III JL, Skelton DR, Han W, Pryputniewicz RJ (2007) “Hybrid approach to MEMS reliability assessment.” Paper No. SPIE6563-03, Proc. Internat. Symp., on MOEMS-MEMS 2007: Reliability, Packaging, and Characterization of MEMS, San Jose, CAGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tyco (2000) “Relay contact life.” Application Note 13C3236, Tyco Electronics Corporation—P&B, Winston-Salem, NCGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tyco (2000) “Contact arc phenomenon.” Application Note 13C3203, Tyco Electronics Corporation—P&B, Winston-Salem, NCGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kalpakjian S, Schmid SR (2001) Manufacturing engineering and technology. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    PTC (2003) Pro/ENGINEER user manual. Parametric Technology Corporation, NeedhamGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    PTC (2003) Pro/MECHANICA user guide. Parametric Technology Corporation, NeedhamGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rosato DA (2002) Thermal analysis system: user manual, v. 6.1, Harvard Thermal, Inc., Harvard, MAGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pryputniewicz RJ, Rosato DA, Furlong C (2003) Measurements and simulation of SMT components. Microelectron Int 20:13–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pryputniewicz RJ (2006) “Advances in optoelectronic metrology: from milliscale to nanoscale applications.” Proc. 7th Internat. Symp. on MEMS and Nanotechnology (7-IS MAN), St. Louis, MO, pp. 1–17Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Skelton DR, Zunino III JL, Han W, Pryputniewicz RJ (2007) “MEMS reliability assessment: preliminary results.” Paper No. 318, in press: Proc. 8th Internat. Symp., on MEMS and Nanotechnology (8-ISMAN), Springfield, MAGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Marinis TF (2009) The future of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). Strain 45:208–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.K. G. Merriam Distinguished Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Director, NEST—NanoEngineering, Science, and Technology, CHSLT—Center for Holographic Studies and Laser micro-mechaTronics, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of EngineeringWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations