Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 52, Issue 5, pp 513–524 | Cite as

Design and Simulation of a Novel Multi-Axial Fatigue Test Rig

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

This research covers the design and simulation of a novel experimental concept for multi-axial fatigue analysis of cylindrical specimens. The resulting design allows a combination of bending and torsional stress to test specimens with critical diameters ranging from 5 to 15 mm at test frequencies up to 50 Hz. Furthermore, the amplitude and frequency of both loadcases can be controlled independently. The test rig will be used to study and validate fatigue criteria for synchronous and asynchronous loading conditions and to analyze the effect of size on the fatigue life of metal and plastic components. The test setup consists of a closed mechanical loop. The primary shaft contains the cylindrical test specimen and is modified to impose rotating bending loads. The secondary shaft is adjusted to introduce fluctuating torque in the transmission loop. Both shafts are connected by means of two double link mechanisms to minimize the clearance and the inertia of the system. The time-varying multi-axial stress state in the cylindrical specimen is analyzed as a function of the amplitudes and frequencies of both bending and torsional loadcases. This is verified by a numerical fatigue analysis in MSC-Patran and MSC-Fatigue. Finally, the dynamical behavior of the test system is studied using a 5 DOF torsional mass-spring representation and the Lagrangian method. A more complex model with 20 DOF is implemented in SimDriveLine and solved via Matlab to analyze the kinematical and dynamical properties more accurately. Both studies take the mechanical properties of steel and plastic test specimens of different sizes into account.

Keywords

Fatigue test rig Multi-axial loading Simulation Torque introducing concept Closed transmission loop 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by a Ph.D grant of the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen).

References

  1. 1.
    Zahavi E, Torbilo V (1996) Fatigue design: life expectancy of machine parts. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dowling NE (2007) Mechanical behaviour of materials: engineering methods for deformation, fracture, and fatigue. Pearson Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Socie DF, Marquis GGB (2000) Multiaxial fatigue. SAE InternationalGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller B (1985) Multiaxial fatigue. ASTM special technical publication; 853Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    FKM-guideline (2003) Analytical strength assessment of components in mechanical engineering, VDMA, 5th revised editionGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weibull W (1961) Fatigue testing and analysis of results. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee S (1990) Development of a deflection controlled multiaxial fatigue testing machine. J Mech Sci Technol 4(2):103–108Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Downing S, Galliart D (1985) A fatigue test system for a notched shaft in combined bending and torsion, multiaxial fatigue: a symposium, ASTM International, p 24Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO 1143 and DIN 50113, Rotating bar bending fatigue testingGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO 1352, Torsional stress fatigue testingGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DIN ISO 14635–1 (2006) Gears, FZG test proceduresGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lü L, Fuh J (2001) Laser-induced materials and processes for rapid prototyping. Kluwer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Hooreweder B, Sas P, Boonen R, Moens D, De Coninck F (2008) Experimental investigation of scaling laws for mechanical fatigue behaviour. In: 8th National Congress on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 8.8, pp 659–663Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van der Linden G, Vercammen J, Van Hooreweder B, Moens D (2010) Analysis of a multi-axial fatigue test rig implementation. K.U.leuvenGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    MSC Software Corporation, USA, Sana Ana, CA92707 (2005) MSC fatigue user’s manual, version 2005, www.mscsoftware.com
  16. 16.
    Thamm F (2000) The role of the stress trajectories as an aid in the choice of the suitable shape of load-bearing structural elements of engines and structures. Periodica Polytechnica Ser Mech Eng 44(1):171–183Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Litvin FL, Fuentes A (2004) Gear geometry and applied theory. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wells D (1967) Lagrangian dynamics, Schaum’s outline series. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    The MathWorks, USA, Massachusetts (2004) SimDriveLine, model and simulate the mechanics of driveline systems. www.mathworks.com
  20. 20.
    Dudley DW (1962) Gear handbook: the design, manufacture, and application of gears. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schijve J (2009) Fatigue of structures and materials. SpringerGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Van Hooreweder
    • 1
  • D. Moens
    • 1
  • R. Boonen
    • 1
  • P. Sas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering (PMA)K.U.LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations