Experimental Mechanics

, 47:107

Nanomechanical Property and Nanowear Measurements for Sub-10-nm Thick Films in Magnetic Storage



In the magnetic storage industry, thin film carbon overcoats play a critical role in reducing magnetic and physical spacing between the recording slider and the rotating disk so that the information stored per unit area is maximized. Thin film carbon overcoats have been improved such that they exhibit higher hardness with lower thickness of few nanometers and still being able to perform reliably. In this paper, nanoindentation and nanoscratch techniques to measure nanomechanical properties, namely hardness, elastic modulus and shear strength of thin solid films were presented along with a recently developed high resolution force transducer. Nanowear behavior characterization techniques were also examined and were applied to commercially available magnetic disks to characterize their wear behavior. It was shown that the properties and wear behavior of sub-10-nm thick film carbon overcoats were reliably measured. These techniques could be applied to different thin solid films on substrates, and they are not restricted to magnetic storage systems.


Thin film carbon overcoat Nanoindentation Nanoscratch Magnetic storage 


  1. 1.
    Wood RW, Miles J, Olson T (2002) Recording technologies for terabit per square inch systems. IEEE Trans Magn 38(4):1711–1718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) Improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–1580.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herbert EG, Pharr GM, Oliver WC, Lucas BN, Hay JL (2001) On the measurement of stress–strain curves by spherical indentation. Thin Solid Films 398–399, 331–335.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kulkarni AV, Bhushan B (1996) Nano/picoindentation measurements on single-crystal aluminum using modified atomic force microscopy. Mater Lett 29(4–6):221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lim YY, Chaudhri MM (2001) Do residual nano indentations in metals and ceramics relax with time? J Phys D Appl Phys 34(13):L70–L78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu N, Bonin WA, Polycarpou AA (2005) High-resolution capacitive load-displacement transducer and its application in nanoindentation and adhesion force measurements. Review of Scientific Instruments 76(4):045109-1-045109-8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kohzaki M, Matsumuro A, Hayashi T, Muramatsu M, Yamaguchi K (1997) Preparation of carbon nitride thin films by ion beam assisted deposition and their mechanical properties. Thin Solid Films 308–309, 239–244.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scharf TW, Deng H, Barnard JA (1997) Nanowear/nanomechanical testing and the role of stress in sputtered CNx overcoats. J Appl Physi 81(8):5393–5935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lemoine P, Zhao JF, Quinn JP, McLaughlin JA, Maguire P (2000) Hardness measurements at shallow depths on ultra-thin amorphous carbon films deposited onto silicon and Al2O3-TiC substrate. Thin Solid Films 379:166–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu N, Polycarpou AA (2004) Use of the focused ion beam technique to produce a sharp spherical diamond indenter for sub-10 nm nanoindentation measurements. J Vac Sci Technol B 22(2):668–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tayebi N, Conry TF, Polycarpou AA (2003) Determination of hardness from nanoscratch experiments: Corrections for interfacial shear stress and elastic recovery. J Mater Res 18(9):2150–2162.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tayebi N, Polycarpou AA, Conry TF (2004) Effects of the substrate on the determination of hardness of thin films by the nanoscratch and nanoindentation techniques. J Mater Res 19(6):1791–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tayebi N, Conry TF, Polycarpou AA (2004) Reconciliation of nanoscratch hardness with nanoindentation hardness including the effects of interface shear stress. J Mater Res 19(11):3316–3323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goddard J, Wilman H (1962) A theory of friction and wear during the abrasion of metals. Wear 5:114–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Komvopoulos K, Saka N, Suh NP (1985) Mechanism of friction in boundary lubrication. ASME Journal of Tribology 107:452–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kral DR, Komvopoulos K, Bogy DB (1996) Hardness of thin film media: Scratch experiments and finite element simulations. ASME Journal of Tribology 118:1–11.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee KM, Polycarpou AA (2006) Shear strength determination using the nanoscratch technique and its application to thin solid films. J Mater Res 21(9).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Archard JF (1953) Contact and rubbing of flat surface. J Appl Physi 24:981–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhao X, Bhushan B (1998) Material removal mechanisms of single-crystal silicon on nanoscale and at ultralow loads. Wear 223:66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu W, Komvopoulos K (2001) Nanotribological and nanomechanical properties of ultrathin amorphous carbon films synthesized by radio frequency sputtering. ASME Journal of Tribology 123:641–650.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sneddon IN (1965) The relation between load and the penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci 3:44–57.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bückle H (1973) The science of hardness testing and its research applications. In: Westbrook JH, Conrad H (eds) American Society of Metals, Metals Park. OH.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu Z, Rowcliffe D (2004) Finite element analysis of substrate effect on indentation behavior of thin films. Thin Solid Films 447–448, 399–405.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saha R, Xue Z, Huang Y, Nix WD (2001) Indentation of a soft metal film on a hard substrate: Strain gradient hardening effect. J Mech Phys Solids 49(9):1997–2014.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boussinesq J (1885) Application des potentials a l’etude de l’equilibre du movement des solides elastiqeus. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tabor D (1951) Hardness of metals. Claredon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hertz H (1896) On the contact of rigid elastic solids. J. Reine und Angewandte Mathmatik, 92, 156 (1882), English Translation by Jones and Schott, London Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mindlin RD (1949) Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. J Appl Mech 16:259–268.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hamilton GM, Goodman LE (1966) The stress field created by a circular sliding contact. J Appl Mech 33:371–376.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hamilton GM (1983) Explicit equations for the stresses beneath a sliding spherical contact. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Mechanical Engineering Science 197:53–59.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sackfield A, Hills DA (1983) Some useful results in the tangentially loaded Hertz contact problem. J Strain Anal 18(2):107–110.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bryant MD, Keer LM (1982) Rough contact between elastically and geometrically similar curved bodies. J Appl Mech 49:345–352.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kuhn L, Corcoran S, Wyrobek T (1998) Measuring the hardness of ultra-thin coatings. Data Storage Magazine, July, 55–57.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations