Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 47, Issue 5, pp 701–707 | Cite as

Statistical Analysis of the Effect of Intensity Pattern Noise on the Displacement Measurement Precision of Digital Image Correlation Using Self-correlated Images

  • Z. Y. Wang
  • H. Q. Li
  • J. W. Tong
  • J. T. Ruan


This paper discusses the effect of intensity pattern noise on the displacement measurement precision of digital image correlation (DIC). Through mathematical deduction, a formula is presented to estimate the displacement measurement error caused by intensity pattern noise. The resulting formula synthetically reflects the effects of the variance of noise, the intensity variance and the subset size on the displacement measurement precision. To verify the correctness of the resulting formula, two experiments are done. The first one is a real self-correlation experiment, and aims to analyze the effect of the subset size, while the second is a numerical self-correlation experiment, and is to analyze to the effect of the different noise levels. The experimental results are in good agreement with the theoretical predictions.


Digital image correlation Displacement measurement precision Intensity pattern noise 


  1. 1.
    Chu TC, Ranson WF, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1985) Application of digital-image correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp Mech 25:232–244 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruck HA, McNeill SR, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1989) Digital image correlation using Newton–Raphson method of partial differential correction. Exp Mech 46:261–267 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sutton MA, Turner JL, Bruck HA, Chae TA (1991) Full-field representation of discretely sampled surface deformation for displacement and strain analysis. Exp Mech 31:168–177 (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lagattu F, Lafarie-Frenot MC, Lam TQ, Brillaud J (2005) Experimental characterization of overstress accommodation in notched CFRP composite laminates. Compos Struct 67:347–357 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sutton MA, McNeill SR, Jang JS, Babai M (1988) Effects of subpixel image restoration on digital correlation error estimates. Opt Eng 27:870–877 (October).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tolat AR, McNeill SR, Sutton MA (1991) Effects of contrast and brightness on subpixel image correlation. In: Proceedings of the twenty-third southeastern symposium on system theory, pp 604–608 (March).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun Z, Lyons JS, McNeill SR (1997) Measuring microscopic deformation with digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 27:409–428 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schreier HW, Sutton MA (2002) Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions. Exp Mech 42:303–310 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peters WH, Ranson WF (1982) Digital imaging technique in experimental stress analysis. Opt Eng 21:427–431 (May/June).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peters WH, Ranson WF, Sutton MA, et al (1983) Applications of digital image correlation methods to rigid body mechanics. Opt Eng 22:738–742 (June).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jin H, Bruck HA (2005) Theoretical development for point wise digital image correlation. Opt Eng 44(6) (June, 067003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang SB, Li XY, Cao YD, Dong DS, Tong JW, et al (2005) Deformation measurement using mutual information: principle and applications. Opt Lasers Eng 43:895–903 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Y. Wang
    • 1
  • H. Q. Li
    • 1
  • J. W. Tong
    • 1
  • J. T. Ruan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanics, School of Mechanical EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations