Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 31–38 | Cite as

Residual Stress Determination Using Hole Drilling and 3D Image Correlation

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In recent years, the hole drilling method for determining residual stresses has been implemented with optical methods such as holographic interferometry and ESPI to overcome certain limitations of the strain rosette version of hole drilling. Although offering advantages, the interferometric methods require vibration isolation, a significant drawback to their use outside of the laboratory. In this study, a 3D image correlation approach was used to measure micron-sized surface displacements caused by the localized stress relief associated with hole drilling. Residual stresses were then found from the displacements using non-dimensional relations previously derived by finite element analysis. A major advantage of image correlation is that it does not require interferometric vibration isolation. Experiments were performed to check the ability of this new approach for uniaxial and equi-biaxial states of stress. Stresses determined by the approach were in good agreement with computed values and those determined by hole drilling using holographic interferometry.

Keywords

Hole drilling Residual stress Image correlation Holographic interferometry Optical 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ASTM Committee E-28 (2001) Determining residual stresses by the hole-drillling strain-gage method, standard E837-99. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schajer GS, Roy G, Flaman MT, Lu J (1996) Hole drilling and ring core methods, chap. 9. In: Handbook of measurement of residual stresses. Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, pp 5–34.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bass JD, Schmitt DR, Ahrens TJ (1986) Holographic in situ stress measurements. Geophys J R Astron Soc 85(1):13–41.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nelson DV, Mc Crickerd JT (1986) Residual stress determination through combined use of holographic interferometry and blind hole drilling. Exp Mech 26(4):371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antonov AA (1983) Inspecting the level of residual stress in welded joints by laser interferometry. Weld Prod 30(9):29–31.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin S-T, Hsieh C-T, Hu C-P (1994) Two holographic blind-hole methods for measuring residual stresses. Exp Mech 34(2):141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmitt DR, Li Y (1996) Three dimensional stress relief displacement resulting from drilling a blind hole in acrylic. Exp Mech 36(4):412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Makino A, Nelson D (1994) Residual stress determination by single-axis holographic interferometry and hole drilling—Part I: Theory. Exp Mech 34(1):66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pisarev VS, Balalov VV, Aistov VS, Bondarenko MM, Yustus MG (2001) Reflection hologram interferometry combined with hole drilling technique as an effective tool for residual stress field investigation in thin-walled structures. Opt Lasers Eng 36(6):551–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steinzig M, Ponslet E (2003) Residual stress measurement using the hole drilling method and laser speckle interferometry: Part I. Exp Tech 27(3):43–46.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ponslet E, Steinzig M (2003) Residual stress measurement using the hole drilling method and laser speckle interferometry: part II, analysis technique. Exp Tech 27(4):17–21.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Focht G, Schiffner K (2003) Determination of residual stresses by an optical correlative hole-drilling method. Exp Mech 43(1):97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asundi A, Zhang J (1999) Industrial application of residual stress determination using 2-D in-plane sensitive fiber ESPI and hole drilling. In: Proc. 1999 optical engineering for sensing and nanotechnology, vol. 3740. SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, pp 78–81.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diaz FV, Kaufman GH, Galizzi GE (2000) Determination of residual stress using hole drilling and digital speckle interferometry with automated data analysis. Opt Lasers Eng 33(1):39–48.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McDonach A, McKelvie J, MacKenzie PM, Walker CA (1983) Improved Moire interferometry and applications in fracture mechanics, residual stress and damaged composites. Exp Tech 7(6):20–24.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nicoletto G (1991) Moire interferometry determination of residual stresses in the presence of gradients. Exp Mech 31(3):252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ya M, Dai F, Lu J (2003) Study of non-uniform in-plane and in-depth residual stress of friction stir welding. J Press Vessel Technol 125(2):201–208.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwarz RC, Kutt LM, Papazian JM (2000) Measurement of residual stress using interferometric Moire: a new insight. Exp Mech 40(3):271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cardenas Garcia JF, Ekwaro Osire, Berg JM (2001) Solution to the Moire hole problem. Mech Res Comm 28(1):13–32.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li K (1997) Application of interferometric strain rosette to residual stress measurements. Opt Lasers Eng 27(1):125–136.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li K (2003) Measurement of in-plane residual stress varying with depth by the interferometric strain/slope rosette and incremental drilling. J Eng Mater Technol 125(2):153–162.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hung MYY, Long KW, Wang JQ (1997) Measurement of residual stress by phase shift shearography. Opt Lasers Eng 27(1):61–73.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luo PF, Chao YJ, Sutton MA (1994) Application of stereo vision to 3-D deformation analysis in fracture mechanics. Opt Eng 33(3):981–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmidt T, Tyson J, Galanulis K (2003) Full-field dynamic displacement and strain measurement using advanced 3D image correlation photogrammetry: Part II. Exp Tech 27(4):22–26.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sutton MA, McNeill SR, Helm JD, Chao YJ (2000) Advances in two-dimensional and three-dimensional computer vision. In: Rastogi PK (ed) Photomechanics, topics appl. phys., vol. 77, pp 323–372.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Atkinson K (1993) Elementary Numerical Analysis, 2nd edn. J. Wiley, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kahn-Jetter ZL, Chu CT (1990) Three-dimensional displacement measurement using digital image correlation and photogrammetric analysis. Exp Mech 30(1):10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schmidt T, Tyson J, Galanulis K (2003) Full-field dynamic displacement and strain measurement using advanced 3D image correlation photogrammetry: part I. Exp Tech 27(3):47–50.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Juvinall RC (1967) Engineering Considerations of Stress, Strain & Strength. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    (2000) TCC-2 holocamera, Tavex America, Inc., Cocoa Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Flaman MT, Herring JT (1985) Comparison of four hole-producing techniques for the center-hole residual stress measurement method. Exp Tech 9(8):30–32.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nawwar AM, Shewchuk J (1978) On the measurement of residual stress gradients in aluminum alloy specimens. Exp Mech 18(7):269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    ARAMIS (2004) v. 5.3.0 User's Manual, Revision A, GOM mbH, Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cherouat A, Montay G, Lu J (2002) Study of residual stresses in complex parts by experimental and numerical methods. Mat Sci Forum 404–407:251–256.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baldi A (2005) A new analytical approach for hole drilling residual stress analysis by full field method. J Eng Mater Technol 127(2):165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mc Ginnis MJ, Pessiki S, Turker H (2005) Application of three-dimensional digital image correlation to the core-drilling method. Exp Mech 45(4):359–367.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Trilion Quality SystemsWest ConshohockenUSA

Personalised recommendations