Book Review

Angoff, W. H., & Huddleston, E. M. (1958). The multi-level experiment: A study of a two-stage system for the College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test. Statistical Report 58–21. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Lord, F. M. (1970). Some test theory for tailored testing. In W. H. Holtzman (Ed.), Computer-assisted instruction, testing, and guidance (pp. 139–183). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Lord, F. M. (1971a). A theoretical study of two-stage testing. Psychometrika, 36, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lord, F. M. (1971b). Robbins-Munro procedures for tailored testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lord, F. M. (1971c). The self-scoring flexilevel test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strunk, W, Jr, & White, E. B. (1995). The elements of style (3rd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Wainer, H., & Keily, G. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wainer, H., Bradlow, E., & Wang, X. (2007). Testlet response theory and its applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar