, Volume 70, Issue 3, pp 481–496 | Cite as

A relation between a between-item multidimensional IRT model and the mixture rasch model



Two generalizations of the Rasch model are compared: the between-item multidimensional model (Adams, Wilson, and Wang, 1997), and the mixture Rasch model (Mislevy & Verhelst, 1990; Rost, 1990). It is shown that the between-item multidimensional model is formally equivalent with a continuous mixture of Rasch models for which, within each class of the mixture, the item parameters are equal to the item parameters of the multidimensional model up to a shift parameter that is specific for the dimension an item belongs to in the multidimensional model. In a simulation study, the relation between both types of models also holds when the number of classes of the mixture is as small as two. The relation is illustrated with a study on verbal aggression.


Rasch model multidimensional IRT models mixture Rasch model Saltus model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams R.J., Wilson M., Wang W.C. (1997) The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement 21:1–23Google Scholar
  2. Bock R.D., Gibbons R., Muraki E. (1988) Full-information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement 12:261–280Google Scholar
  3. De Leeuw J., Verhelst N. (1986) Maximum likelihood estimation in generalized Rasch models. Journal of Educational Statistics 11:183–196Google Scholar
  4. Lindsay B., Clogg C.C., Grego J. (1991) Semiparametric estimation in the Rasch model and related exponential response models, including a simple latent class model for item analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 86:96–108Google Scholar
  5. Mislevy R.J., Verhelst N. (1990) Modeling item responses when different subjects employ different solution strategies. Psychometrika 55:195–215Google Scholar
  6. Mislevy R.J., Wilson M. (1996) Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for a psychometric model of discontinuous development. Psychometrika 61:41–71Google Scholar
  7. Reise S.P., Gomel J.N. (1995) Modeling qualitative variation within latent trait dimensions: Application of mixed-measurement to personality assessment. Multivariate Behavioral Research 30:341–358Google Scholar
  8. Rijmen F., Tuerlinckx F., De Boeck P., Kuppens P. (2003) A nonlinear mixed models framework for IRT models. Psychological Methods 8:185–205Google Scholar
  9. Rost J. (1990) Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement 14:271–282Google Scholar
  10. SAS Institute Inc. (1999). SAS OnlineDoc (Version 8) [software manual on CD-ROM]. SAS Institute Inc, Cary NCGoogle Scholar
  11. Schwartz G. (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 6:461–464Google Scholar
  12. Tjur T. (1982) A connection between Rasch’s item analysis model and a multiplicative Poisson model. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 9:23–30Google Scholar
  13. Vansteelandt K. (1999) A formal model for the competency-demand hypothesis. European Journal of Personality 13(5, Spec Issue):429–442Google Scholar
  14. Wilson M.(1989) Saltus: a psychometric model of discontinuity in cognitive development. Psychological Bulletin 105:276–289Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUnivesity of LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations