Development and performance analysis of a low-cost MEMS microphone-based hearing aid with three different audio amplifiers

  • Souvik Mallik
  • Debjyoti Chowdhury
  • Madhurima ChttopadhyayEmail author
S.I. : CSI2017


In this paper, MEMS-based capacitive microphone and low-cost amplifier are designed for low-cost power-efficient hearing aid application. The developed microphone along with the associated circuitry is mounted on a common board in the form of pocket-type (body-worn) device. The designed microphone consists of a flexible circular silicon nitrite (Si3N4) diaphragm and a polysilicon-perforated back plate with air as dielectric between them. The incident acoustic waves on the sensor cause deflection of the diaphragm to alter the air gap between the perforated back plate (fixed electrode) and the diaphragm (moving plate) which causes a change in capacitance. The acoustic pressure applied to the microphone is from 0 to 100 Pa for an operating range of 100 Hz–10 kHz which corresponds to the audible frequency range in case of human beings. The main purpose of this work is to increase the longevity of battery used in conventional hearing aids. The designed MEMS microphone with Si3N4 diaphragm is capable of identifying acoustic frequencies (100 Hz to 10 kHz) which correspond to a specific change in absolute pressure from 0 to 100 Pa for 2-micron-thick diaphragm with a sensitivity of about 0.08676 mV/Pa. The design of the sensor and the characteristics analysis are performed in FEM-based simulation software, which are later validated in real time. The prototype is designed using MEMS microphone and low-cost amplifier ICs with biasing components in the form of pocket-type (body-worn) hearing aid. In order to study the performance of proposed device, three different market-available amplifiers with controllable gain are used. Finally, the performance of the hearing aid is studied through audio spectrogram analysis to choose the best-suited amplifier among the three.


MEMS Microphone Circular diaphragm FEM Hearing aid Amplifier 



  1. 1.
    Bergqvist J, Gobet J (1994) Capacitive microphone with a surface micromachined backplate using electroplating technology. J Microelectromech Syst 3(2):69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chowdhury S, Jullien GA, Ahmadi MA, Miller WC (2000) MEMS acousto-magnetic components for use in a hearing instrument. Presented at SPIE’s symposium on design, test integration, and packaging of MEMS/MOEMS, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ganji BA, Majlis BY (2009) Design and fabrication of a new MEMS capacitive microphone using a perforated aluminum diaphragm. Sens Actuat A 149:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ganji BA, Majlis BY (2009) High sensitivity and small size MEMS capacitive microphone using a novel slotted diaphragm. Microsyst Technol 15(9):1401–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ganji BA, Majlis BY (2010) Slotted capacitive microphone with sputtered aluminum diaphragm and photoresist sacrificial layer. Microsyst Technol 16:1803–1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hsu PC, Mastrangelo CH, Wise KD (1988) A high density polysilicon diaphragm condenser microphone. In: IEEE 11th international workshop on microelectro mechanical systems conference record (MEMS), pp 580–585Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jing C, Liu L, Li Z, Tan Z, Xu Y, Ma J (2003) On the single-chip condenser miniature microphone using DRIE and back side etching techniques. Sens Actuat A 103:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kabir AE, Bashir R, Bernstein J, De Santis J, Mathews R, O’Boyle JO, Bracken C (1999) Very high sensitivity acoustic transducers with thin P+ membrane and gold back plate. Sens Actuat A 78:138–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kronast W, Muller B, Siedel W, Stoffel A (2001) Single-chip condenser microphone using porous silicon as sacrificial layer for the air gap. Sens Actuat A 87:188–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li X, Lin R, Kek H, Miao J, Zou Q (2001) Sensitivity-improved silicon condenser microphone with a novel single deeply corrugated diaphragm. Sens Actuat A 92:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma T, Man TY, Chan YC, Zohar Y, Wong M (2002) Design and fabrication of an integrated programmable floating-gate microphone. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international conference on micro electro mechanical systems, pp 288–291Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miao J, Lin R, Chen L, Zou Q, Lim SY, Seah SH (2002) Design considerations in micromachined silicon microphones. Microelectron J 33:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ning YB, Mitchell AW, Tait RN (1996) Fabrication of a silicon micromachined capacitive microphone using a dry-etch process. Sens Actuat A3:237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pappalardo M, Caliano G, Foglietti V, Caronti A, Cianci E (2002) A new approach to ultrasound generation: the capacitive micromachined transducers. University Roma, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pappalardo M, Caronti A (2002) A new alternative to piezoelectric transducer for NDE and medical applications: the capacitive ultrasonic micromachined transducer (cMUT). University Roma, RomeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ning J, Liu Z, Liu H, Ge Y (2004) A silicon capacitive microphone based on oxidized porous silicon sacrificial technology. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on solid-state and integrated circuits technology, IEEE, vol 3, pp 1872–1875Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim J, Bakkaloglu B, Chae J (2009) A compact and low-cost MEMS loudspeaker for digital hearing aids. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Souvik Mallik
    • 1
  • Debjyoti Chowdhury
    • 1
  • Madhurima Chttopadhyay
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Applied Electronics and InstrumentationHeritage Institute of TechnologyKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations