Performance-associated parameters of players from the deaf Czech Republic national soccer team: a comparison with hearing first league players
- 67 Downloads
Testing of performance-associated parameters is a routine requirement in high-performance sports. Limited information is available regarding the anthropometrical, physiological and biomechanical characteristics of deaf soccer players.
The primary purpose of this cross-sectional, descriptive study was to investigate possible performance-associated differences between the deaf Czech Republic national team soccer players and hearing counterparts from the Czech Republic First League.
Seventy-four male soccer players (31 deaf and 43 hearing, ≥ 17 years of age) underwent laboratory testing that included measurement of autonomic cardiac activity, anthropometrical parameters, vertical jump performance, and maximal aerobic capacity via an incremental running test.
Compared with the hearing players, deaf players were shorter (p = 0.012), had more body fat (p < 0.001), a higher resting heart rate (p = 0.001), and ratio of Ln rMSSD to R–R interval length (p = 0.006), while maximal power output (p < 0.001), maximal oxygen uptake (p = 0.003), were significantly lower. After correcting for body fat percentage, the differences were not significant except for maximal power output value.
Being at a disadvantage, the deaf soccer players differ from their hearing counterparts in various physiological or morphological parameters assumed to be associated with sports performance in soccer. However, the differences were minimized when taking 10% of body fat as a cut point into account. Thus, reduction in body fat percentage to the 10% level may be considered as one possible strategy for improving both the physical fitness and adaptability level of the studied deaf soccer players.
KeywordsDeaf athlete Team sport Maximal oxygen uptake Body composition Heart rate variability
No financial support was received for the work described in this article.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
This research was performed in accordance with the ethical guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
All the players participating in the study were volunteers and had provided their written informed consent before commencement of the study.
- 2.International Committee of Sport for the Deaf (2016) Audiogram regulations. ICSD, LausanneGoogle Scholar
- 3.Dec KL (2007) Challenged athletes. In: McKeag DB, Moeller JL (eds) ACSM’s primary care sports medicine. American College of Sports Medicine, Philadelphia, pp 293–302Google Scholar
- 6.Vose JE, Clark RA, Sachs ML (2010) Athletes who are blind/visually impaired or deaf/hard of hearing. In: Hanrahan SJ, Andersen MB (eds) Routledge handbook of applied sport psychology: a comprehensive guide for students and practitioners. Routledge, New York, pp 450–459Google Scholar
- 8.Stewart DA (1991) Deaf sport: the impact of sports within the deaf community. Gallaudet University Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- 17.Malik M, Camm AJ (1995) Heart rate variability. Futura Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kelly JS, Metcalfe J (2012) Validity and reliability of body composition analysis using the Tanita BC418-MA. J Exerc Physiol Online 15(6):74–83Google Scholar
- 25.Vaverka F, Jakubsova Z, Jandacka D, Zahradnik D, Farana R, Uchytil J, Supej M, Vodicar J (2013) The influence of an additional load on time and force changes in the ground reaction force during the countermovement vertical jump. J Hum Kinet 38:191–201. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0059 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer WW, Sietsema KE, Sun X-G, Whipp BJ (2012) Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Shephard RJ, Åstrand PO (1992) Endurance in sport. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 29.American College of Sports Medicine (1986) Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 3rd edn. Lea & Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 30.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 36.Güzel NA, Açak M, Örer GE, Savaş S, Coşkuner Z (2012) Comparison of max vo2 levels of elite and deaf footballers. Int J Sport Stud 2:607–610Google Scholar
- 38.Åstrand PO, Rodahl K, Dahl HA, Stromme S (2003) Textbook of work physiology: Physiological bases of exercise, 4th edn. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- 39.Sandercock GR, Bromley PD, Brodie DA (2005) Effects of exercise on heart rate variability: inferences from metaanalysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37433–37439Google Scholar
- 40.Akgul Ercan E, Kiliç A, Savas S, Acak M, Biyikli Z, Tore HF (2016) Deaf athlete: is there any difference beyond the hearing loss? Revista de cercetare şi intervenţie socială 52:241–251Google Scholar