The match-play activity cycles in elite U17, U21 and senior hurling competitive games
- 3 Downloads
The current study aimed to investigate the ball-in-play (BIP) and ball-out-of-play (BOP) differences between U17, U21 and senior hurling matches.
Video recordings of matches (n = 36) were coded and analysed for BIP and BOP. Time when the ball was continuously in-play was considered BIP, whereas any stoppages were considered BOP.
The total and mean BIP cycle duration showed no difference between levels. The number of BIP cycles were higher in senior matches compared to U17 (ES = 1.80: large) and U21 (ES = 1.27: large). U17 matches had a lower frequency of BIP cycles between 16 and 30 s (ES = − 1.75: large) compared to senior. Total BOP duration was longer in senior (45:30 ± 4:13 min) matches compared to U17 (36:31 ± 2:30 min, ES = 2.59: very large) and U21 (36:48 ± 2:53 min, ES = 2.40: very large). Senior matches had a longer BOP duration and greater number of BOP cycles than U17 (ES = 0.17: trivial, ES = 2.20: very large, respectively) and U21 (ES = 0.17: trivial, ES = 0.99: moderate, respectively). U17 matches had a lower frequency of BOP cycles > 60 s (ES = − 1.33: large) compared to senior.
Although there was a difference in the total match duration, U17 and U21 matches have similar BIP time as seniors, suggesting that U17 and U21 players should be conditioned to withstand the elite senior BIP duration. In training practice, high-intensity short-duration games are suggested for repeating the duration demands of competition.
KeywordsPhysical demands Time–motion analysis Team sport Worst case scenario Ball-in-play–ball-out-of-play ratio
The research was funded by grants from the French Ministry of National Education, of Research and of Technology (EA3920) and from Tomsk Polytechnic University Competitiveness Enhancement Program grant, Project № ВИУ-ИСГТ-108/2017-TPU CEP-HSTI-108/2017.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by the University Franche-Comté and the athletes were informed of the purposes and inherent risks associated with this research.
Written informed consent was obtained.
- 2.Collins K, McRobert A, Morton JP et al (2018) The work-rate of elite hurling match-play. J Strength Cond Res 32:805–811Google Scholar
- 6.Beato M, Coratella G, Schena F (2016) Brief review of the state of art in futsal. J Sport Med Phys Fit 56:428–432Google Scholar
- 7.Young D, Mourot L, Beato M, Coratella G (2018) Match-play demands of elite U17 hurlers during competitive matches. J Strength Cond Res. (Epub ahead of print) Google Scholar
- 12.Collins K, Doran DA, Reilly TP (2010) The physiological demands of hurling match-play. In: Anderson M (ed) Contemporary ergonomics and human factors. CRC Press, London, pp 591–595Google Scholar
- 14.Young D, Mourot L, Beato M, Coratella G (2018) The match-play temporal and position-specific physical and physiological demands of senior hurlers. J Strength Cond ResGoogle Scholar
- 21.Malone S, Collins K (2017) The influence of pitch size on running performance and physiological responses during hurling-specific small-sided games. J Strength Cond Res 31(6):1518–1524Google Scholar
- 24.Malone S, Hughes B, Collins K (2017) The influence of exercise to rest ratios on physical and physiological performance during hurling specific small-sided games. J Strength Cond Res 33(1):180–187. (Epub ahead of print) Google Scholar
- 25.Read DB, Jones B, Williams S et al (2018) The physical characteristics of specific phases of play during rugby union match-play. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 20:1–6. (Epub ahead of print) Google Scholar
- 29.Atencio R (1996) Eyestrain: the number one complaint of computer users. Comput Libr 16:40–44Google Scholar
- 30.Hopkins WG (2007) A spreadsheet for deriving a confidence interval, mechanistic inference and clinical inference from a p value. Sportscience 11:16–20Google Scholar