Sport Sciences for Health

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 189–194 | Cite as

The difference of situational efficiency and indicators of situational-motoric skills between national teams in the World handball championship

  • Sanja Bajgoric
  • Muris Djug
  • Nina Bijedic
  • Samra Mededovic
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
  • 166 Downloads

Abstract

This research focused on the establishment of difference in situational-motoric skills and situational efficacy in defence and offence using audio-visual records of the XIX Junior World Handball Championship 2013, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The differences between players of Bosnian and Herzegovinian national team and the first four placed national teams (Sweden, Spain, France and Croatia) by specific playing positions (left back, centre back and right back) were determined. In the case of situational-motoric skills, two indicators (variables) (total/mean number of sprints from the offence to defence, and the total/mean number of jumps in the offence) were analysed, while in the case of the situational efficacy, one variable (total/mean number of fouls 9 m in the game 1:1) was analysed. To establish partial quantitative differences of variables, the pondered mean difference (MD) was used, as well as significance. Observed results indicated that differences existed in situational-motoric skills and situational efficacy between analysed players, according to player’s positions. Therefore, planning of the training process should be directed to improve technical and tactical elements of handball game and the level of the physical preparation to achieve better results, both individually and as a team.

Keywords

Team game Juniors MD analysis Backs Performance 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank to Handball Sport Association of Bosnia and Herzegovina who provided us with the audio–video records of the handball games in the Junior World Handball Championship 2013 in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual (and/or their guardians) participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Rogulj N (2003) Učinkovitost taktičkih modela u rukometu. [Effectiveness of tactical models in handball. In Croatian.] (Doctoral dissertation, University of Zagreb). ZagGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czerwinski J (2000) Statistical analysis and remarks on the game character based on the European Championship in Croatia. EHF Periodical 2:5–11Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weineck J (1988) Optimales Training. Perimed Fachbuch, Verlag, Geselsehalf mnH, Erlangenreb: Kineziološki fakultet Sveučilišta u ZagrebuGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apitzs E, Liu WH (1997) Correlation between field depedence—indepedence and handball shooting by Swedish national male players. Percept Mot Skills 84(1395–1398):1997. doi: 10.2466/pms.84.3c.1395 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taborsky, F. (2008) Cumulative indicators of team playing perfomance in handball (Olimpic games Tournaments 2008). www.eurohandball.com. Accessed 25 Jan 2016
  6. 6.
    Srhoj V, Rogulj N, Padovan M, Katić R (2001) Influence of the attack end conduction on match result in handball. Coll antropol 25(2):611–617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sampaio J, Janeira M (2003) Statistical analyses of basketball team performance: understanding team’s wins and losses according to a different index of ball possessions. Int J Perform Anal Sport 3:40–49Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuchenbecker R, Zieschang K (1992) Belastungsanalysen im Handball und Ableitung für die TrainingsplanungGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psihol Bull 112(1):155–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kampomann K, Sassenberg, Westphal, G (1975) Učinkovitost zaključivanja napadalnih akcij glede na čas trajanja napada (pr.: F.Kalan iz Lehrhilfen fur den Sportuntericht 10/74). Trener: Rukomet 2(11) (17/356):3–12Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuleš B, Šimenc Z (1983) Povezanost bazičnih motoričkih sposobnosti i uspješnosti u rukometu.Kineziologija 2(15):153–163Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brzić V (1990) Realizacija napada na dva svjetska rukometna prvenstva. Fizička kultura 3:44–45Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Praznik, A (1991) Analiza igre glede na čas trajanja in učinkovitost zaključivanja napadov na Svetovnom članskom prvenstvu rokometašev leta 1990 na Čehoslovačkem. (Diplomski rad). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za športGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dizdar, D (1997) Valorizacija jednog metodološkog postupka za prognozu rezultata u nekim sportovima. (Magistarski rad). Zagreb: Fakultet za fizičku kulturuGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Batinović, S (1999) Analiza nekih situacijskih pokazatelja RK “Metković-Jambo” na konačan uspjeh u sezoni 1998/99. (Diplomski rad). Zagreb: Fakultet za fizičku kulturu; www. weblibrary.apeiron-uni.eu:8080/12143-poglavljeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rogulj N (1990) Utjecaj situacijskih struktura kretanja na konačni rezultat rukometne utakmice. Magistarski rad. Fakultet za fizičku kulturu, SarajevoGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rogulj N (1998) Učinkovitost taktičkih modela u rukometu (Doktorska disertacija). Kineziološki fakultet, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vuleta, D, Ćurak, V, Lovrić, V (2011) Analiza pokazatelja situacijske efikasnosti Hrvatske rukometne reprezentacije na Svjetskom prvenstvu 2009. u Hrvatskoj. U: Zbornik radova 20. ljetne škole kineziologa Republike Hrvatske. „Dijagnostika u područjima edukacije,sporta, sportske rekreacije i kineziterapije“Poreč, 21. do 25. lipnja, Hrvatski kineziološki savez. 384–390Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin, D (1990) Trainingslehre: Kursbuch fur die Sportthe-orie in der Schule [Training teaching: Course book for the sports theory at school].Wiesbaden, Germany: LimpertGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Šibila M, Vuleta D, Pori P (2004) Position-related differences in volumes and intensity of large-scale cyclic movements of male players in handball. Kinesiology 36:58–68Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wagner H, Müller E (2008) Motor learning of complex movements. The effects of applied training methods (differential and variable training) to the quality parameters (ball velocity, accuracy and kinematics) of a handball throw. Sports Biomech 7:54–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jöris HJJ, Edwards van Muyen AJ, van Ingen Schenau GJ, Kemper HCG (1985) Force, velocity and energy flow during the overarm throw in female handball players. J Biomech 18:409–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sibila M, Pori P, Bon M (2003) Basic kinematic differences between two types of jump shot techniques in handball. Acta Universita Palacki Olomuc 33:19–26Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fradet L, Botcazou M, Durocher C, Cretual A, Multon F, Prioux J, Delamarche P (2004) Do handball throws always exhibit a proximal-to-distal segment sequence? Eur J Sport Sci 22:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gorostiaga EM, Granados C, Ibanez J, Izquierdo M (2005) Differences in physical fitness and throwing velocity among elite and amateur male handball players. Int J Sports Med 37:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pori P, Bon M, Sibila M (2005) Jump shot performance in teamhandball. A kinematic model evaluated on the basis of expert modeling. Int J Fundam Appl Kinesiol 37:40–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanja Bajgoric
    • 1
  • Muris Djug
    • 1
  • Nina Bijedic
    • 2
  • Samra Mededovic
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Health and SportUniversity of TuzlaTuzlaBosnia and Herzegovina
  2. 2.Faculty of Informational TechnologyUniversity “Dzemal Bijedic” of MostarMostarBosnia and Herzegovina
  3. 3.Faculty of EducationUniversity “Dzemal Bijedic” of MostarMostarBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations