The effect of age on positional differences in anthropometry, body composition, physique and anaerobic power of elite basketball players
- 649 Downloads
The main aim of this study was to examine differences in physical and physiological characteristics, with an emphasis on anaerobic power, of male basketball players by age and playing position.
Basketball players (n = 101), classified into three age groups: under 15 years (U-15, n = 35, 14.28 ± 0.72 years), under 18 years (U-18, n = 35, 16.23 ± 0.74 years) and older than 18 years (Elite, n = 31, 25.66 ± 5.09 years), participated in this study. The variables under examination were anthropometric characteristics, body composition, physical working capacity test, 3-min step test, Wingate anaerobic test, force–velocity test, sit-and-reach test, handgrip strength test and countermovement vertical jump with arm swing.
U-15, U-18 and elite players differed for all aforementioned parameters with the older group scoring better than the younger (η 2 ≥ 0.06, p < 0.048). In Elite group, centers were heavier and taller than guards (22.3 kg and 20.9 cm, respectively) and forwards (14.3 kg and 10.6 cm), and forwards were taller than guards (10.2 cm). Guards’ scores were higher than centers in maximal power (3.61 W kg−1) and in peak power (1.39 W kg−1). Forwards scored higher than centers in mean power (1.25 W kg−1). In the U-18 group, guards were stronger in the relative strength than centers (2.4 kg kg−1). In the U-15 group, centers were taller than guards (17.8 cm) and forwards (9.7 cm), and forwards were also taller than guards (8.1 cm).
Based on the findings of this study, it is concluded that positional differences, especially in anaerobic power, in male basketball vary by age. Thus, young basketball players should not be regarded as miniature adult basketball players with regard to their physical and physiological characteristics, and their positional specialization.
KeywordsPositional role Sport training Physical fitness Anaerobic power Age groups Sport training Profile Team sport
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest in this paper.
- 4.Bradic A, Bradic J, Pasalic E, Markovic G (2009) Isokinetic leg strength profile of elite male basketball players. J Strength Cond Res 23(4):1332–1337Google Scholar
- 6.Tsitskaris G, Theoharopoulos A, Garefis A (2003) Speed, speed dribble and agility of male basketball players playing in different positions. J Hum Mov Stud 45(1):21–30Google Scholar
- 8.Nikolaidis PT, Ingebrigtsen J, Povoas SC, Moss S, Torres-Luque G (2014) Physical and physiological characteristics in male team handball players by playing position: does age matter? J Sports Med Phys Fit (in print)Google Scholar
- 9.MacDonccha C, Watson AWS, McSweeney T, O’Donovan DJ (1999) Reliability of Eurofit physical fitness items for adolescent males with and without mental retardation. Adapt Phys Activ Q 16:86–95Google Scholar
- 12.Ross WD, Marfell-Jones MJ (1991) Kinanthropometry. In: MacDougall JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ (eds) Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- 15.Nikolaidis PT (2011) Association between submaximal and maximal measures of aerobic power in female adolescents. Biomed Hum Kinet 3(1):106–110Google Scholar
- 16.Heyward VH (2010) Advanced fitness assessment and exercise prescription. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar