Maximal oxygen uptake of Italian firefighters: laboratory vs. field evaluations
- 354 Downloads
The aim of this study was to compare the aerobic power of firefighters evaluated by means of laboratory and field tests. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) of 15 Italian male firefighters (age: 31 ± 6 years; BMI: 24.7 ± 2.1) was compared during a graded incremental treadmill test to exhaustion and an endurance field test (Queen’s College step test) performed with and without wearing the protective clothing and the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) conditions. A 2 (conditions: with vs. without SCBA) × 2 (test setting: laboratory vs. field) ANOVA for repeated measures was used to verify significant differences (p < 0.05). Pearson correlation and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated. Despite differences (p < 0.01) emerged between Queen’s College step test with SCBA values and the other tests, no significant correlations were observed. The evaluation of fitness level is important to avoid the risks of job-related injuries, ensuring that physically capable personnel could perform this crucial public safety occupation. Thus, the present results demonstrate that specific fitness tests should be used for monitoring changes in firefighter’s health status and for guiding their training programme and that a periodic evaluation of firefighters can be performed in easy and accurate manner.
KeywordsFirefighters Maximal oxygen uptake Self-contained breathing apparatus
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Italian Firefighters Corp for their support in developing the test protocol and carrying out the experimental sessions.
Conflict of interest
- 1.Gilman WD, Davis PO (1993) Firefighting demands aerobic fitness. NFPA J 87:68–73Google Scholar
- 10.Womack JW, Green JS, Crouse SF (2000) Cardiovascular risk markers in firefighters: longitudinal study. Cardiovasc Rev Rep 21:544–548Google Scholar
- 14.National Fire Protection Association (2007) NFPA Association 1500: standard on health-related fitness programs for fire figthers. National Fire Protection Association, QuincyGoogle Scholar
- 16.VV.F. (2010) Statistica del Corpo Nazionale Vigili del Fuoco. Ministero dell’Interno dipartimento dei Vigili del Fuoco del Soccorso Pubblico e della Difesa Civile, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- 17.Foster JA, Roberts GV (1994) Measurement of the firefighting environment. Report no. 61. Home Office Scientific Research and Development Branch, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 21.Punakallio A, Lusa S, Luukkonen R (2003) Protective equipment affects balance abilities differently in younger and older firefighters. Aviat Space Environ Med 74(11):1151–1156Google Scholar
- 29.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Eribaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 30.Hales T (2008) NFPA Medical Guidelines: CAD Screeing and Cardiac Fitness. In: NECOEM/OEMAC Cardiovascular Disease and Firefighter Mini-Conference. http://www.necoem.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=390129
- 31.Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs DR Jr, Leon AS (2000) Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(9):498–504Google Scholar
- 38.Rodriquez JL, Eldridge JA (2003) The function of aerobic capacity and strength in predicting the probability of injury in fire fighters. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:S209Google Scholar