In some types of human and animal locomotion, speed influences the amount of metabolic energy expended per unit mass and distance (energy cost, EC) and as speed decreases or increases away from a healthy person’s self-selected speed (SSS), the EC increases. When asked to climb a vertical wall using their preferred speed, similar to walking, climbers with the same level of skill spontaneously select comparable speeds. The present research was designed to investigate how speed of ascent affects the EC of climbing; we were also interested in finding out whether climbers with the same level of skill exhibit a common SSS and if it is correlated with optimal economy (i.e. minimum EC). A representative experimental set-up was prepared to quantify the economy of rock climbing by measuring steady-state oxygen intake (VO2) in very skilled climbers while climbing at their SSS and at higher (HS) and lower (LS) speed, and computing the relative EC. The main findings were: (a) climbers with the same level of skill exhibited the same preferred climbing speed (10.2 ± 1.5 m·min−1) at the same fraction of their maximum VO2 (VO2peak) measured on a cycle ergometer (71.7 ± 15.2%), and (b) climbing economy continuously increased as speed increased from LS to HS. Thus climbing at the SSS does not correspond to the optimal economy. A possible explanation for these findings may be that although it does not match the minimum EC, the SSS would be the best compromise between the need to reduce the time spent in isometric work (useless and costly) and the need to avoid early muscle fatigue due to increased speed and frequency of muscle contraction.
Energy cost Metabolimeter Self-selected speed
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Watts PB, Drobish KM (1998) Physiological responses to simulated rock climbing at different angles. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:1118–1122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Moraes Bertuzzi RC, Franchini E, Kokubun E et al (2007) Energy system contributions in indoor rock climbing. Eur J Appl Physiol 101:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermier CM, Robergs RA, McMinn SM, Heyward VH (1997) Energy expenditure and physiological responses during indoor rock climbing. Br J Sports Med 31:224–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts PB, Clure CA, Hill MR, et al (1995) Energy costs of rock climbing at different paces (abstract). Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:S17Google Scholar
de Geus B, O’Driscoll SV, Meeusen R (2006) Influence of climbing style on physiological responses during indoor rock climbing on routes with the same difficulty. Eur J Appl Physiol 98:489–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margaria R (1938) Sulla fisiologia e specialmente sul consumo energetico della marcia e della corsa a varia velocità ed inclinazione del terreno. Atti Accad Nazional Lincei 7:299–368Google Scholar
Tosi P, Leonardi A, Zerbini L et al (2010) Energy cost and efficiency of ski mountaineering. A laboratory study. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 50:400–406PubMedGoogle Scholar
Full RJ, Tullis A (1990) Energetics of ascent: insects on inclines. J Exp Biol 149:307–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rodio A, Fattorini L, Rosponi A et al (2008) Physiological adaptation in noncompetitive rock climbers: good for aerobic fitness? J Strength Cond Res 22(2):359–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibella F, Frosio I, Schena F, Borghese NA (2007) 3D analysis of the body center of mass in rock climbing. Hum Mov Sci 26:841–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malatesta D, Simar D, Dauvilliers Y et al (2004) Aerobic determinants of the decline in preferred walking speed in healthy, active 65- and 80-years-olds. Pflugers Arch 447:915–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin PE, Rothstein DE, Larish DD (1992) Effects of age and physical activity status on the speed-aerobic demand relationship of walking. J Appl Physiol 73:200–206PubMedGoogle Scholar