Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Correlation between two propulsion efficiency indices in front crawl swimming

  • 162 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

In front crawl, stroke length (SL) and stroke rate (SR) are two important technical determinants of performance. The relationship between these parameters has been investigated by several authors and two propulsion efficiency indices have been proposed to assess improvements of the front crawl stroke effectiveness in swimmers. The stroke index (SI), proposed by Costill in 1985, relates the velocity (v) and the SL as shown in the following equation: SI=SL v; while the propelling efficiency of the arm stroke, proposed by Zamparo et al. in 2005, relates v, SR and the shoulder-to-hand distance of the arm (l) following the equation: ηp=((0.9 v)/2π SF l) 2/π. The aim of this study was to assess whether the two indices were correlated in two groups (M, males; F, females) of young expert front crawl swimmers, in order to utilise both of them as interchangeable tools when evaluating improvements in propulsion efficacy. The participants performed a 400-m trial, and analyses were carried out for the overall performance as well as for each 100-m section of the 400 m (S1, S2, S3, S4), underlining also a possible gender difference. All the correlations found were significant (p<0.01). The correlation coefficients were lower in M than in F for the overall 400-m trial (R=0.74; R=0.83, respectively) and for each 100-m section (M, R=0.76, R=0.73, R=0.67, R=0.71 for S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively; F, R=0.84, R=0.84, R=0.79, R=0.83 for S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively). Since the correlations are not constant throughout the trial, it seems that fatigue affects the two indices differently as well as males and females. Particularly, female swimmers kept more homogeneous stroke parameters, although their performances were lower than the male counterpart. In conclusion, both indices can be used as a device for monitoring the propulsion efficiency in front crawl in our groups of young swimmers, but further studies are needed to better explain how fatigue affects both SI and ηp, especially in the last phases of the performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Barbosa TM, Keskinen KL, Fernandes R et al (2005) Relationships between energetic, stroke determinants, and velocity in butterfly. Int J Sports Med 26:841–846

  2. 2.

    Costill D, Kovalevski J, Porter D et al (1985) Energy expenditure during front crawl swimming: predicting success in middle-distance events. Int J Sports Med 6:74–77

  3. 3.

    Craig AB Jr, Skehan PL, Pawelczyk JA, Boomer WL (1985) Velocity, stroke rate, and distance per stroke during elite swimming competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17:625–634

  4. 4.

    Maglischo EW (2003) Swimming fastest. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp 695–703

  5. 5.

    Wakayoshi K, D’Acquisto LJ, Cappaert JM, Troup JP (1995) Relationship between oxygen uptake, stroke rate and swimming velocity in competitive swimming. Int J Sports Med 16:19–23

  6. 6.

    Chollet D, Pelayo P, Delaplace C et al (1997) Stroking characteristic variations in the 100-M freestyle for male swimmers of differing skill. Percept Mot Skills 85:167–177

  7. 7.

    Craig AB Jr, Pendergast DR (1979) Relationships of stroke rate, distance per stroke, and velocity in competitive swimming. Med Sci Sports 11:278–283

  8. 8.

    Toussaint HM, Beek PJ (1992) Biomechanics of competitive front crawl swimming. Sports Med 13:8–24

  9. 9.

    Pendergast D, Zamparo P, di Prampero PE et al (2003) Energy balance of human locomotion in water. Eur J Appl Physiol 90:377–386

  10. 10.

    Zamparo P, Pendergast DR, Mollendorf J et al (2005) An energy balance of front crawl. Eur J Appl Physiol 94:134–144

  11. 11.

    Keskinen KL, Komi KV (1993) Stroke characteristics of front crawl swimming during exercise. J Appl Biomech 9:219–226

  12. 12.

    Fernandes RJ, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Vilas-Boas JP (2006) Is time limit at the minimum swimming velocity of VO2 max influenced by stroking parameters? Percept Mot Skills 103:67–75

  13. 13.

    Jürimäe J, Haljaste K, Cicchella A et al (2007) Analysis of swimming performance from physical, physiological, and biomechanical parameters in young swimmers. Pediatr Exerc Sci 19:70–81

  14. 14.

    Deschodt VJ, Arsac LM, Rouard AH (1999) Relative contribution of arms and legs in humans to propulsion in 25-m sprint frontcrawl swimming. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 80:192–199

  15. 15.

    Hollander AP, De Groot G, Van Ingen Schenau GJ et al (1988) Contribution of the legs to propulsion in front crawl swimming. In: Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K (eds) Swimming science V. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp 39–43

  16. 16.

    Zamparo P (2006) Effects of age and gender on the propelling efficiency of the arm stroke. Eur J Appl Physiol 97:52–58

  17. 17.

    Weiss M, Reischle K, Bouws N et al (1988) Relationship of blood lactate accumulation to stroke rate and distance per stroke in top female swimmers. In: Ungerechts BE, Reischle K (eds) Swimming science V, pp 295–303

  18. 18.

    Deschodt V (1999) Modifications de la trajectoire aquatique du poignet liees a l’apparition de la fatigue lors d’exercises intermittents en natation. Science et motricite 37:19–25

  19. 19.

    Chollet D, Chalies S, Chatard JC (2000) A new index of coordination for the crawl: description and usefulness. Int J Sports Med 21:54–59

  20. 20.

    Alberty M, Sidney M, Dekerle J et al (2003) Effects of an exhaustive exercise on upper limb coordination and intracyclic velocity variation in front crawl stroke. In: Chatard JC (ed.) Biomechanics and medicine in swimming IX, Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, pp 81–85

  21. 21.

    Tella V, Jorda’ J, Saavedra J et al (2006) Fatigue effects on intracycle speed in freestylers. In: Hellard P, Sidney M, Fauquet C, Lehenaff D (eds) Proceedings First International Symposium Sciences and Practices in Swimming. Atlantica, pp 83–86

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Stefano Longo.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-009-0076-4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Longo, S., Scurati, R., Michielon, G. et al. Correlation between two propulsion efficiency indices in front crawl swimming. Sport Sci Health 4, 65 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-008-0069-z

Download citation

Key words

  • Swimming
  • Stroke index
  • Propelling efficiency