Advertisement

Comparison between auto-trilevel and bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation for treatment of patients with concurrent obesity hypoventilation syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

  • Chunfang Zou
  • Weiwei Sheng
  • De Huai
  • Juan Cao
  • Mei Su
  • Ding Ning
  • Rong Xue
  • Yanli Wang
  • Mao Huang
  • Xilong ZhangEmail author
Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Our study aims to compare the difference in clinical efficacy between auto-trilevel positive airway pressure (auto-trilevel PAP) ventilator and conventional fixed bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilator for obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) patients with coexisting moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).

Methods

Twenty-three OHS patients with moderate or severe OSAHS enrolled between January 2015 and September 2017 underwent ventilation by three different modes of positive airway pressure (PAP) for 8 h per night. A single variable mode was applied at the first night followed by two nights when no PAP therapy was carried out as a washout period between each mode. The inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) decided by PaCO2 was consistently used for modes 1, 2, and 3. In mode 1, the expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) issued by BiPAP was decided by the minimal PAP levels for cessation of snoring. However, in mode 2, the EPAP was fixed at 3 cmH2O higher than this value. With the use of auto-trilevel PAP in mode 3, the EPAP was set to initially match that of mode 1 but the end of EPAP (EEPAP) was automatically regulated to be elevated according to upper airway patency condition. We also compared the following parameters including apnea hypopnea index (AHI), minimal SpO2 (miniSpO2), arousal index, and sleep efficiency during sleep; PaCO2 in the morning and Epword sleepiness score (ESS) at daytime were measured prior to and during PAP treatment as well as between three selected PAP modes.

Results

Compared with the parameters before ventilation therapies, all three variable modes of ventilation were associated with a higher nocturnal miniSpO2 and sleep efficiency (all P < 0.01). Among the three variable modes, mode 3 resulted in not only the lowest arousal index and daytime ESS but also the highest sleep efficiency. Compared to mode 1, mode 2 demonstrated a significantly reduced AHI and an elevated miniSpO2 and morning PaCO2 (all P < 0.05), while mode 3 was associated with a decreased AHI, an increased miniSpO2 (all P < 0.05), and no statistical change of PaCO2 following the end of PAP treatment (P > 0.05). Comparison between mode 2 and mode 3 revealed that mode 3 had a significantly lower PaCO2 (P < 0.05), but displayed no remarkable changes of AHI and miniSpO2 (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared to fixed BiPAP ventilation, auto-trilevel PAP ventilation could more effectively correct hypercapnia, achieve lower index of nocturnal apnea and hypopnea, more improved sleep quality, and lower daytime sleepiness score. Auto-trilevel PAP ventilation is therefore more efficacious than conventional BiPAP ventilation in non-invasive ventilation therapy for OHS patients with concurrent moderate or severe OSAHS.

Keywords

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome Obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome Positive airway pressure ventilation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for language editing during revision of the manuscript provided by Sabrina Saeed at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA02912.

Funding

The 333 high level personnel training program in Jiangsu Province (BRA-2017239) provided financial support in the form of ventilator training funding and the key research and development program of Huai’an (social development HAS201611) provided financial support in the form of equipment funding for this study. The sponsors had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Raveendran R, Wong J, Singh M, Wong DT, Chung F (2017) Obesity hypoventilation syndrome, sleep apnea, overlap syndrome: perioperative management to prevent complications. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 30:146–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shetty S, Parthasarathy S (2015) Obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Curr Pulmonol Rep 4:42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pierce AM, Brown LK (2015) Obesity hypoventilation syndrome: current theories of pathogenesis. Curr Opin Pulm Med Curr Opin Pulm Med 21:557–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nicolini A, Banfi P, Grecchi B, Lax A, Walterspacher S (2014) Non-invasive ventilation in the treatment of sleep-related breathing disorders: a review and update. Rev Port Pneumol 20:324–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Piper AJ, BaHammam AS, Javaheri S (2017) Obesity hypoventilation syndrome choosing the appropriate treatment of a heterogeneous disorder. Sleep Med Clin 12:587–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Su M, Huai D, Cao J, Ning D, Xue R, Xu M, Huang M, Zhang X (2018) Auto-trilevel versus bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation for hypercapnic overlap syndrome patients. Sleep Breath 22:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heinzer R, White DP, Malhotra A, Lo YL, Dover L, Stevenson KE, Jordan AS (2008) Effect of expiratory positive airway pressure on sleep disordered breathing. Sleep 31:429–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Braga CW, Chen Q, Burschtin OE, Rapoport DM, Ayappa I (2011) Changes in lung volume and upper airway using MRI during application of nasal expiratory positive airway pressure in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. J Appl Physiol 111:1400–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morrell MJ, Arabi Y, Zahn B, Badr MS (1998) Progressive retropalatal narrowing preceding obstructive apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158:1974–1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force (1999) Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. Sleep 22:667–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johns MW (1991) A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 14:540–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zerah F, Harf A, Perlemuter L, Lorino H, Lorino AM, Atlan G (1993) Effects of obesity on respiratory resistance. Chest 103:1470–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pankow W, Podszus T, Gutheil T, Penzel T, Peter J et al (1998) Expiratory flow limitation and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure in obesity. J Appl Physiol 85:1236–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steier J, Jolley CJ, Seymour J, Roughton M, Polkey MI, Moxham J (2009) Neural respiratory drive in obesity. Thorax 64:719–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunfang Zou
    • 1
  • Weiwei Sheng
    • 1
  • De Huai
    • 2
  • Juan Cao
    • 3
  • Mei Su
    • 1
  • Ding Ning
    • 1
  • Rong Xue
    • 1
  • Yanli Wang
    • 1
  • Mao Huang
    • 1
  • Xilong Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyXuzhou Medical University Affiliated Huai’an Hospital and Huai’an Second People’s HospitalHuai’anChina
  3. 3.Department of RespirologyWuxi People’s HospitalWuxiChina

Personalised recommendations