Advertisement

Sleep and Breathing

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 857–863 | Cite as

Effect of mandibular advancement splint treatment on tongue shape in obstructive sleep apnea

  • Toru Ogawa
  • Jianlan LongEmail author
  • Kate Sutherland
  • Andrew S. L. Chan
  • Keiichi Sasaki
  • Peter A. Cistulli
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Mandibular advancement splints (MAS) can effectively treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however, treatment response is variable, and the mechanisms behind differences in treatment outcomes are still not well understood. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the effects of MAS on tongue shape and (2) to compare tongue shape changes with MAS between treatment responders and nonresponders.

Methods

Sixty-eight adults with symptomatic mild to severe OSA were included. A custom-made MAS was provided to patients, and treatment outcome was determined by polysomnography. Two-dimensional tongue measurements were evaluated using sagittal and axial MRI image slices without and with MAS in situ. Tongue measurements of height, length, width, area, and shape (height/length) were collected. Additional measurements of surrounding upper airway structures, soft palate length width and area and upper airway area, length and minimum width were measured on sagittal image slices.

Results

Based on polysomnography with MAS in situ, 47 patients were classified as responders (≥50 % reduction in apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] from baseline), and 21 were nonresponders (<50 % AHI reduction). There was no change in sagittal tongue area with insertion of MAS, although there was a change in most of parameters of tongue shape. Responders showed a greater decrease in tongue length with MAS in situ compared to nonresponders (−0.64 ± 0.46 vs −0.32 ± 0.51 cm, p = 0.016).

Conclusion

This study reports a detailed two-dimensional analysis of tongue dimensions as well as assessment of adjacentsoft palate shape and upper airway structures without and with MAS treatment for OSA. Our finding suggests that MAS does induce changes in tongue shape. MAS treatment responders showed a greater decrease in tongue length (between the tongue tip and hyoid bone) with MAS in situ; whether differences in alteration of tongue position with MAS explain differences in treatment response requires further investigation.

Keywords

Obstructive sleep apnea Mandibular advancement splint Tongue Airway MRI 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr Biao Zeng, Dr Jin Qian, Dr Andrew Ng, Dr Belinda Liu, and the sleep laboratory staff at St George and Royal North Shore Hospitals for their assistance, and Dr. Saeed Jafari from the Division of Orthodontic Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry for his support.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. SomnoMed provided the oral appliances for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force (1999) Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. Sleep 22:667–689Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, Palta M, Hagen EW, Hla KM (2013) Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol 177:1006–1014PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cistulli PA, Gotsopoulos H, Marklund M, Lowe AA (2004) Treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with mandibular repositioning appliances. Sleep Med Rev 8:443–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giles TL, Lasserson TJ, Smith BJ, White J, Wright J, Cates CJ (2006) Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 25, CD001106Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoffstein V (2007) Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep Breath 11:1–22PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sutherland K, Cistulli P (2011) Mandibular advancement splints for the treatment of sleep apnea syndrome. Swiss Med Wkly 141:w13276. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13276 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watanabe T, Isono S, Tanaka A, Tanzawa H, Nishino T (2002) Contribution of body habitus and craniofacial characteristics to segmental closing pressures of the passive pharynx in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:260–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mostafiz W, Dalci O, Sutherland K, Malhotra A, Srinivasan V, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2011) Influence of oral and craniofacial dimensions on mandibular advancement splint treatment outcome in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 139:1331–1339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chan AS, Sutherland K, Schwab RJ, Zeng B, Petocz P, Lee RW, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2010) The effect of mandibular advancement on upper airway structure in obstructive sleep apnoea. Thorax 65:726–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Almeida FR, Tsuiki S, Hattori Y, Takei Y, Inoue Y, Lowe AA (2011) Dose-dependent effects of mandibular protrusion on genioglossus activity in sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J 37:209–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johal A, Gill G, Ferman A, McLaughlin K (2007) The effect of mandibular advancement appliances on awake upper airway and masticatory muscle activity in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 27:47–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsuiki S, Ono T, Kuroda T (2000) Mandibular advancement modulates respiratory-related genioglossus electromyographic activity. Sleep Breath 4:53–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shen HL, Wen YW, Chen NH, Liao YF (2012) Craniofacial morphologic predictors of oral appliance outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Am Dent Assoc 43:1209–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poon KH, Chay SH, Chiong KF (2008) Airway and craniofacial changes with mandibular advancement device in Chinese with obstructive sleep apnoea. Ann Acad Med Singapore 37:637–644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Menn SJ, Loube DI, Morgan TD, Mitler MM, Berger JS, Erman MK (1996) The mandibular repositioning device: role in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 9:794–800Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Do KL, Ferreyra H, Healy JF, Davidson TM (2000) Does tongue size differ between patients with and without sleep-disoreded breathing? Laryngoscope 110:1552–1555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lowe AA, Fleetham JA, Adachi S, Ryan CF (1995) Cephalometric and computed tomographic predictors of obstructive sleep apnea severity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107:589–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iida-Kondo C, Yoshino N, Kurabayashi T, Mataki S, Hasegawa M, Kurosaki N (2006) Comparison of tongue volume/oral cavity volume ratio between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients and normal adults using magnetic response imaging. J Med Dent Sci 53:119–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Okubo M, Suzuki M, Horiuchi A et al (2006) Morphologic analyses of mandible and upper airway soft tissue by MRI of patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome. Sleep 29:909–915PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pae EK, Lowe AA (1999) Tongue shape in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Angle Orthod 69:147–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zeng B, Ng AT, Darendeliler MA, Petocz P, Cistulli PA (2007) Use of flow-volume curves to predict oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175:726–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zeng B, Ng AT, Qian J, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2008) Influence of nasal resistance on oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 31:543–547PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumar P, Parkash H, Bhargava A, Gupta S, Bagga DK (2013) Reliability of anatomic reference planes in establishing the occlusal plane in different jaw relationships: a cephalometric study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 13:571–577PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Furuhashi A, Yamada S, Shiomi T, Sasanabe R, Aoki Y, Yamada Y, Kazaoka Y (2013) Effective three-dimensional evaluation analysis of upper airway form during oral appliance therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. J Oral Rehabil 40:582–589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kato T, Yamaguchi T, Okura K, Abe S, Lavigne GJ (2013) Sleep less and bite more: sleep disorders associated with occlusal loads during sleep. J Prosthodont Res 57:69–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pouderoux P, Kahrilas PJ (1995) Deglutitive tongue force modulation by volition, volume, and viscosity in humans. Gastroenterology 108:1418–1426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu ZJ, Shcherbatyy V, Perkins JA (2008) Functional loads of the tongue and consequences of volume reduction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:1351–1361PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brown EC, Cheng S, McKenzie DK (2013) Tongue and lateral upper airway movement with mandibular advancement. Sleep 36:397–404PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kyung SH, Park YC, Pae EK (2005) Obstructive sleep apnea patients with the oral appliance experience pharyngeal size and shape changes in three dimensions. Angle Orthod 75:15–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Choi JK, Hur YK, Lee JM, Clark GT (2010) Effects of mandibular advancement on upper airway dimension and collapsibility in patients with obstructive sleep apnea using dynamic upper airway imaging during sleep. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:712–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toru Ogawa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jianlan Long
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kate Sutherland
    • 2
    • 3
  • Andrew S. L. Chan
    • 2
  • Keiichi Sasaki
    • 1
  • Peter A. Cistulli
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Advanced Prosthetic DentistryTohoku University Graduate School of DentistrySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Centre for Sleep Health and Research, Department of Respiratory MedicineRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsAustralia
  3. 3.Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and Sydney Medical SchoolUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations