Sleep and Breathing

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 809–815 | Cite as

Videoendoscopic diagnosis for predicting the response to oral appliance therapy in severe obstructive sleep apnea

  • Yasuhiro Sasao
  • Kanji Nohara
  • Kentaro Okuno
  • Yuki Nakamura
  • Takayoshi Sakai
Original Article



In treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), oral appliance (OA) therapy is indicated in patients with mild–moderate OSA. However, since patients with severe OSA in whom OA therapy was effective have also been reported, it may not be possible to determine indications for OA therapy based on the severity alone. The purpose of this study was to determine indications for OA therapy using endoscopy during wakefulness in patients with severe OSA.


The subjects consisted of 36 patients (27 males and 9 females) diagnosed with severe OSA using all-night polysomnography. In each patient, a nasoendoscope was inserted in a horizontal position during nasal breathing, and morphological changes in the airway of the velopharynx and oro-hypopharynx with mandibular advancement were evaluated.


With mandibular advancement, the oro-hypopharynx was widened in all patients while the velopharynx was widened in 29 patients, but not in 7. The apnea hypopnea index (AHI) reduction rate after OA application was 79.8 % (SD, 13.0 %) in the group with and 40.6 % (SD, 27.0 %) in the group without velopharyngeal widening, being significantly different between the two groups. In the group showing velopharyngeal widening, evaluation of the direction of widening revealed two types: the “all-round type”, which is circumferential widening in the anteroposterior–lateral directions, and the “lateral dominant type”, which is widening mainly in the lateral direction. The AHI reduction rate was 80.1 % (SD, 15.0 %) for the all-round type and 79.3 % (SD, 10.6 %) for the lateral dominant type showing no significant difference.


(1) Concerning indications for OA therapy, findings in the velopharynx rather than those in the hypopharynx may be important. (2) The effects of OA therapy can be expected in the presence of velopharyngeal widening irrespective of its direction. Thus, to determine whether OA therapy is indicated, endoscopic evaluation of morphological changes in the velopharynx with mandibular advancement may be important.


Endoscopy Sleep apnea Oral appliance Velopharynx Predict 


  1. 1.
    Engleman HM, McDonald JP, Graham D, Lello GE, Kingshott RN, Coleman EL, Mackas TW, Douglas NJ (2002) Randomized cross-over trial of two treatments for sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:855–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferguson KA, Ono T, Lowe AA, Keenan SP, Fleetham JA (1996) A randomized crossover study of an oral appliance vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of mild-moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 109:1269–1275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark GT, Blumenfeld I, Yoffe N, Peled E, Lavie P (1996) A crossover study comparing the efficiency of continuous positive airway pressure with anterior mandibular positioning devices on patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 109:1477–1483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lowe AA, Sjoholm TT, Ryan CF, Fleetham JA, Ferguson KA, Remmers JE (2000) Treatment, airway and compliance effects of a titratable oral appliance. Sleep 23(Suppl 4):S172–S178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleetham JA, Ferguson KA, Lowe AA, Ryan CF (1996) Oral appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 19:S288–S290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kushida CA, Morgenthaler TI, Littner MR, Alessi CA, Bailey D, Coleman J Jr, Friedman L, Hirshkowitz M, Kapen S, Kramer M, Lee-Chiong T, Owens J, Pancer JP (2005) Practice parameters for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with oral appliances: an update for 2005. Sleep 29:240–243Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ama J, Joanna MB, Kotecha BT (2005) Sleep nasoendoscopy: a diagnostic tool for predicting treatment success with mandibular advancement splints in obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur J Orthod 27:607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayer G, Meier-Ewert K (1995) Cephalmetric predictors for orthopaedic mandibular advancement in obstructive sleep apnea. Eur J Orthod 17:35–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sanner BM, Heise M, Knoben B, Machnick M, Laufer U, Kikuth R, Zidek W, Hellmich B (2002) MRI of the pharynx and treatment efficacy of a mandibular advancement device in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Respir J 20:143–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force (1999) Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendation for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. Sleep 22:667–689Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Isono S, Tanaka A, Sho Y, Konno A, Nishino T (1995) Advancement of the mandible improves velopharygeal airway patency. J Appl Physiol 79(6):2132–2138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tonogi M, Arisaka T, Tsukamot Y, Sato K, Ymane G, Ohkushi T, Nakajima T (2007) Examination of change in sleep-disordered breathing before and after orthogenetic surgery—part 1 change of the apnea hypopnea index. Jpn J Jaw Deform 17:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isono S, Remmers JE, Tanaka A, Sho Y, Sato J, Nishino T (1997) Anatomy of pharynx in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and in normal subjects. J Appl Physiol 82(4):1319–1326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fukuda T, Mano T, Uchida K, Wada N, Mori Y, Ueyama Y (2007) Effect of mandibular advancement oral appliances in patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. Jpn J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55(7):414–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mihaescu M, Mylavarapu G, Gutmark EJ, Powell NB, Biomech J (2011) Large eddy simulation of the pharyngeal airflow associated with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome at pre and post-surgical treatment. J Biomech 44(12):2221–2228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chan ASL, Lee RWW, Cistulli PA (2008) Dental appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 132:693–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ng AT, Qian J, Cistulli PA (2006) Oropharyngeal collapse predicts treatment response with oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 29:666–671PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Remmers J, Charkhandeh S, Grosse J, Topor Z, Brant R, Santosham P, Bruehlmann S (2013) Remotely controlled mandibular protrusion during sleep predicts therapeutic success with oral appliances in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 36(10):1517–1525PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Otsuka R, Almeida FR, Lowe AA, Ryan F (2006) A comparison of responders and nonresponders to oral appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:214–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Horiuchi A, Suzuki M, Ookubo M, Ikeda K, Mitani H, Sugawara J (2005) Measurement techniques predicting the effectiveness of an oral appliance for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome. Angle Orthod 75:1003–1011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu Y, Lowe AA, Fleetham JA, Park YC (2001) Cephalometric and physiologic predictors of the efficacy of an adjustable oral appliance for treating obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120:639–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoekema A, Doff MH, de Bont LG, van der Hoeven JH, Wijkstra PJ, Pasma HR, Stegenga B (2007) Predictors of obstructive apnea-hypopnea treatment outcome. J Dent Res 86:1181–1186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsuiki S, Lowe AA, Almeida FR, Fleetham JA (2004) Effects of an anteriorly titrated mandibular position on awake airway and obstructive sleep apnea severity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125(5):548–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zeng B, AT NG, Darendeliler MA, Petocz P, Cistulli PA (2007) Use of flow-volume curves to predict oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175:726–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mehta A, Qian J, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2001) A randomized, controlled study of a mandibular advancement splint for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:1457–1461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marklund M, Stenlund H, Franklin KA (2004) Mandibular advancement devices in 630 men and women with obstructive sleep apnea and snoring: tolerability and predictors of treatment success. Chest 125:1270–1278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sasao Y, Okuno K, Nohara K, Sakai T (2011) Role of dentists in the field of sleep: disordered breathing. Clin All-Round 60(8):1700–1708Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sasao Dental Clinic, Center for Oral Functional DisordersIwakuni CityJapan
  2. 2.Division for Oral-Facial DisordersOsaka University Dental HospitalSuita CityJapan
  3. 3.Division for Oral-Facial DisordersOsaka University Graduate School of DentistryOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations