Sleep quality and sleep patterns in relation to consumption of energy drinks, caffeinated beverages, and other stimulants among Thai college students
Poor sleep and heavy use of caffeinated beverages have been implicated as risk factors for a number of adverse health outcomes. Caffeine consumption and use of other stimulants are common among college students globally. However, to our knowledge, no studies have examined the influence of caffeinated beverages on the sleep quality of college students in Southeast Asian populations. We conducted this study to evaluate the patterns of sleep quality and to examine the extent to which poor sleep quality is associated with consumption of energy drinks, caffeinated beverages, and other stimulants among 2,854 Thai college students.
A questionnaire was administered to ascertain demographic and behavioral characteristics. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was used to assess sleep habits and quality. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify statistically significant associations.
Overall, the prevalence of poor sleep quality was found to be 48.1 %. A significant percent of students used stimulant beverages (58.0 %). Stimulant use (odds ratios (OR) 1.50; 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) 1.28–1.77) was found to be statistically significant and positively associated with poor sleep quality. Alcohol consumption (OR 3.10; 95 % CI 1.72–5.59) and cigarette smoking (OR 1.43; 95 % CI 1.02–1.98) also had a statistically significant association with increased daytime dysfunction due to sleepiness. In conclusion, stimulant use is common among Thai college students and is associated with several indices of poor sleep quality.
Our findings underscore the need to educate students on the importance of sleep and the influences of dietary and lifestyle choices on their sleep quality and overall health.
KeywordsSleep Energy drinks Alcohol Caffeine Students Cigarettes
H.K. and G.C. were research training fellows with the Multidisciplinary International Research Training Program of the Harvard University School of Public Health when this research study was completed. The Multidisciplinary International Research Program is supported by an award from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (T37-MD000149).
Conflict of interest
None to declare.
- 7.Knutson KL (2012) Sociodemographic and cultural determinants of sleep deficiency: implications for cardiometabolic disease risk. Soc Sci Med. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.002Google Scholar
- 13.Bunka D (2011) The drink of athletics, rock stars, college students…and your twelve year old! RxFiles, Saskatoon Health Region. http://www.rxfiles.ca/rxfiles. Accessed 16 July 2012
- 22.Falavigna A, de Souza Bezerra ML, Teles AR, Kleber FD, Velho MC, Steiner B, Beckenkamp NL, Lazzaretti L, Barazzetti D, Abruzzi F, Baseggio N, de Braga GL, Ferrari P, de Souza MV (2011) Sleep disorders among undergraduate students in Southern Brazil. Sleep Breath 15(3):519–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.WHO (2004) Global status report on alcohol. World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 26.Freiberg MS, Cabral HJ, Heeren TC, Vasan RS, Curtis Ellison R (2004) Alcohol consumption and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the US: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Diabetes Care 27(12):2954–2959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.WHO (1995) Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 28.Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology. Wolters Kluwer Health, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 34.Luo M, Feng Y, Li T (2012) Sleep medicine knowledge, attitudes, and practices among medical students in Guangzhou, China. Sleep Breath. doi: 10.1007/s11325-012-0743-xGoogle Scholar
- 44.Yunusa I, Ahmad IM (2012) Energy-drinks: composition and health benefits. Bayero J Pure Appl Sci 4(2):186–191Google Scholar