A case–control study of craniofacial features of children with obstructed sleep apnea
- 337 Downloads
This study aims to analyze differences in the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue components of craniofacial structure predisposing to the pediatric obstructive sleep apnea, by a comparison of the cephalograms between children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and controls.
Materials and methods
The study enrolled a total of 30 children who were composed of the following two groups: 15 OSA patients and 15 controls. The two groups were strictly matched by age and sex. Lateral head radiographs were obtained and then cephalometric measurements were compared between the two. Fifty-six measurements were determined to study various skeletal, soft tissue, and airway structure.
Marked differences were demonstrated in terms of SNB, PG-NB, lower facial height, H-C3Me, and adenoid (A) and tonsil (T/P). The SNB angle (75.82 ± 4.30) in case group was smaller than in the control (78.71 ± 2.61; p = 0.035), the PG/NB value in case group (1.32 ± 0.84 mm) was higher than that in the control (0.62 ± 0.60 mm; p = 0.015). The anterior lower facial height was 65.12 ± 5.91 mm in case group (p = 0.048), while the anterior lower facial height in control was 61.51 ± 3.22 mm. The position of hyoid was lower in case group (5.30 ± 3.67 mm) compared with the control one (2.64 ± 2.58 mm; p = 0.029). Furthermore, the patients with OSA had larger As and T/Ps than the controls.
The case group differed from the control group in the length of mandible, anterior lower facial height, position of hyoid and the chin, and the size of the As and T/Ps.
KeywordsPediatric sleep apnea syndrome Craniofacial features PSG Cephalometrics
This study was supported by grants from Capital Research Fund of Science Development (2007–3009) and National Science Foundation of China (30872915).
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest in the authorship or publication of this contribution and no presentation at any conference.
- 1.American Thoracic Society (1996) Standards and indications for cardiopulmonary sleep studies in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153:866–878Google Scholar
- 4.Trrenouth MJ, Timms DJ (1999) Relationship of the functional oropharynx to craniofacial morphology. Angle Orthod 69:419–423Google Scholar
- 9.Bernard DB, Andrzej K, Robert HB (1988) Cephalometric analysis for diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope 98:226–234Google Scholar
- 17.Özdemir H, Altin R, Söğüt A, Cinar F, Mahmutyazicioğlu K, Kart L, Uzun L, Davşanci H, Gündoğdu S, Tomaç N (2004) Craniofacial differences according to AHI scores of children with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: cephalometric study in 39 patients. Pediatr Radiol 34:393–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Johannesson S (1968) Roentgenologic investigation of the nasopharyngeal tonsil in children of different ages. Acta Radiol Diagn 7:299–304Google Scholar
- 23.Fujioka M, Young LW, Girdany BR (1979) Radiographic evaluation of adenoidal size in children: adenoidal–nasopharyngeal ratio. Am J Roentgenol 133:401–404Google Scholar
- 28.Raanan A, Joseph MM, Andrew T, Soroosh M, Catherrine ET, Greg M, Richard JS, Allan IP (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway structure of children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:698–703Google Scholar