Cost-effectiveness of oral appliances in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea–hypopnoea
- 252 Downloads
Oral appliances (OA) are commonly prescribed for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea–hypopnoea (OSAH), but there is limited evidence on their cost-effectiveness.
Materials and methods
A model was designed to simulate the costs and benefits of treatment of OSAH with OA or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) based on their effects on quality of life, motor vehicle crashes, and cardiovascular effects. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of costs per one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained 5 years after treatment.
Compared with no treatment, OA results in $268 higher costs and an incremental QALY of 0.0899 per patient (ICER = $2,984/QALY). Compared with OA, CPAP resulted in $1,917 more costs and 0.0696 additional QALYs (ICER = $27,540/QALY). For the most part in the sensitivity analyses, CPAP remained cost-effective compared to OA, and OA remained cost-effective with respect to no treatment in almost all scenarios.
OAs are less economically attractive than CPAP but remain a cost-effective treatment for patients who are unwilling or unable to adhere to CPAP therapy.
KeywordsObstructive sleep apnoea Oral appliances Continuous positive airway pressure Economic evaluation Decision analysis
- 8.Lim J et al (2006) Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD004435Google Scholar
- 11.Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine C.o.I.S (1990) The Abbreviated Injury Scale-1990 Revision (AIS-90). Available from http://www.carcrash.org/publications_books.htm. Cited 2007 2007/12/19
- 17.National Highway Traffic Safety Administration N.C.f.S.a.A. US Departmentt of Transportation (2006) Traffic safety facts 2005. Available from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSFAnn/TSF2005.pdf. Cited 2007 2007/12/19
- 18.Blincoe L, S.L., Zaloshnja L, Miller T, Romano E, Luchter S, Spicer R (2000) Economic impact of motor vehicle crashes, 2000. National Highway Traffic safety Administration 2000. National Highway Traffic safety Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 20.Krieger J et al (1997) Accidents in obstructive sleep apnea patients treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a prospective study. The Working Group ANTADIR, Paris and CRESGE, Lille, France. Association Nationale de Traitement a Domicile des Insuffisants Respiratoires. Chest 112(6):1561–1566 doi: 10.1378/chest.112.6.1561 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Suratt P, Findley L (1992) Effect of nasal CPAP treatment on automobile driving simulator performance and on self-reported automobile accidents in subjects with sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 145:A69Google Scholar
- 34.Mc-Daid C G.S., Weatherly H, Durée K, van der Burgt M, van Hout S, Akers J, Davies RJO, Sculpher M, Westwood M (2007) The continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea–hypopnoea syndrome: a systematic review and economic analysis. CRD/CHE Technology Assessment Group (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination/Centre for Health Economics), University of York, pp 120–126Google Scholar