Advertisement

Sleep and Breathing

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 213–219 | Cite as

Evaluation of a portable recording device (ApneaLink™) for case selection of obstructive sleep apnea

  • Hui Chen
  • Alan A. Lowe
  • Yuxing Bai
  • Peter Hamilton
  • John A. Fleetham
  • Fernanda R. Almeida
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

This study was designed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a portable sleep apnea recording device (ApneaLink™) using standard polysomnography (PSG) as a reference and to evaluate the possibility of using the ApneaLink™ as a case selection technique for patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Materials and methods

Fifty patients (mean age 48.7 ± 12.6 years, 32 males) were recruited during a 4-week period. A simultaneous recording of both the standard in-laboratory PSG and an ambulatory level 4 sleep monitor (ApneaLink™) was performed during an overnight study for each patient. PSG sleep and respiratory events were scored manually according to standard criteria. ApneaLink™ data were analyzed either with the automated computerized algorithm provided by the manufacturer following the American Academy of Sleep Medicine standards (default setting DFAL) or The University of British Columbia Hospital sleep laboratory standards (alternative setting, ATAL). The ApneaLink respiratory disturbance indices (RDI), PSG apnea–hypopnea indices (AHI), and PSG oxygen desaturation index (ODI) were compared.

Results

The mean PSG-AHI was 30.0 ± 25.8 events per hour. The means of DFAL-RDI and ATAL-RDI were 23.8 ± 21.9 events per hour and 29.5 ± 22.2 events per hour, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.958 between PSG-AHI and DFAL-RDI and 0.966 between PSG-AHI and ATAL-RDI. Receiver operator characteristic curves were constructed using a variety of PSG-AHI cutoff values (5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 events per hour). Optimal combinations of sensitivity and specificity for the various cutoffs were 97.7/66.7, 95.0/90.0, 87.5/88.9, 88.0/88.0, and 88.2/93.9, respectively for the default setting. The ApneaLink™ demonstrated the best agreement with laboratory PSG data at cutoffs of AHI ≥ 10. There were no significant differences among PSG-AHI, DFAL-RDI, and ATAL-RDI when all subjects were considered as one group. ODI at 2%, 3%, and 4% desaturation levels showed significant differences (p < 0.05) compared with PSG-AHI, DFAL-RDI, and ATAL-RDI for the entire group.

Conclusion

The ApneaLink™ is an ambulatory sleep monitor that can detect OSA and/or hypopnea with acceptable reliability. The screening and diagnostic capability needs to be verified by further evaluation and manual scoring of the ApneaLink™. It could be a better choice than traditional oximetry in terms of recording respiratory events, although severity may be under- or overestimated.

Keywords

Home monitoring Obstructive sleep apnea Polysomnography Oral appliance ApneaLink™ 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mrs. Ingrid Ellis for her editorial assistance in the final preparation of this manuscript and the polysomnographic technologists in UBC Hospital sleep disorder laboratory. As a postdoctoral fellow, Dr. Hui Chen was supported in part from royalties paid to The University of British Columbia from worldwide Klearway™ sales.

References

  1. 1.
    Duran-Cantolla J (2005) New directions in the diagnosis of sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Arch Bronconeumol 41:645–648, doi: 10.1016/S1579-2129(06)60330-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flemons WW, Douglas NJ, Kuna ST, Rodenstein DO, Wheatley J (2004) Access to diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169:668–672, doi: 10.1164/rccm.200308-1124PP PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Young T, Evans L, Finn L, Palta M (1997) Estimation of the clinically diagnosed proportion of sleep apnea syndrome in middle-aged men and women. Sleep 20:705–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghegan MD, Angelos PC, Stonebraker AC, Gillespie MB (2006) Laboratory versus portable sleep studies: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 116:859–864, doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000214866.32050.2e PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force (1999) Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. Sleep 22:667–689Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Polysomnography Task Force, American Sleep Disorders Association Standards of Practice Committee (1997) Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures. Sleep 20:406–422Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flemons WW, Littner MR, Rowley JA, Gay P, Anderson WM, Hudgel DW et al (2003) Home diagnosis of sleep apnea: a systematic review of the literature. An evidence review cosponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the American Thoracic Society. Chest 124:1543–1579, doi: 10.1378/chest.124.4.1543 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Man GC, Kang BV (1995) Validation of a portable sleep apnea monitoring device. Chest 108:388–393, doi: 10.1378/chest.108.2.388 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Standards of Practice Committee of the American Sleep Disorders Association (1994) Practice parameters for the use of portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 17:372–377Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chesson AL Jr, Berry RB, Pack A (2003) Practice parameters for the use of portable monitoring devices in the investigation of suspected obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Sleep 26:907–913PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collop NA, Anderson WM, Boehlecke B, Claman D, Goldberg R, Gottlieb DJ et al (2007) Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 3:737–747PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Almeida FR, Ayas NT, Otsuka R, Ueda H, Hamilton P, Ryan FC et al (2006) Nasal pressure recordings to detect obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 10:62–69, doi: 10.1007/s11325-005-0042-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tanaka M, Katagai K, Tsutsumi Y, Namekawa T, Fukuhara T, Takizawa H et al (2002) An ambulatory respirometer (Hotmate) as a tool for screening of sleep apnea syndrome. Rinsho Byori 50:68–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Penzel T, Kesper K, Ploch T, Becker HF, Vogelmeier C (2004) Ambulatory recording of sleep apnea using peripheral arterial tonometry. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 5:3856–3859PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pittman SD, Ayas NT, MacDonald MM, Malhotra A, Fogel RB, White DP (2004) Using a wrist-worn device based on peripheral arterial tonometry to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea: in-laboratory and ambulatory validation. Sleep 27:923–933PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zou D, Grote L, Peker Y, Lindblad U, Hedner J (2006) Validation a portable monitoring device for sleep apnea diagnosis in a population based cohort using synchronized home polysomnography. Sleep 29:367–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Golpe R, Jimenez A, Carpizo R, Cifrian JM (1999) Utility of home oximetry as a screening test for patients with moderate to severe symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 22:932–937PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Whitelaw WA, Brant RF, Flemons WW (2005) Clinical usefulness of home oximetry compared with polysomnography for assessment of sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171:188–193, doi: 10.1164/rccm.200310-1360OC PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lies A, Nabe B, Pankow W, Kohl FV, Lohmann FW (1996) Hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring before and with nCPAP-therapy. Z Kardiol 85(Suppl 3):140–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Redline S, Budhiraja R, Kapur V, Marcus CL, Mateika JH, Mehra R et al (2007) The scoring of respiratory events in sleep: reliability and validity. J Clin Sleep Med 3:169–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Netzer N, Eliasson AH, Netzer C, Kristo DA (2001) Overnight pulse oximetry for sleep-disordered breathing in adults: a review. Chest 120:625–633, doi: 10.1378/chest.120.2.625 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakano H, Ikeda T, Hayashi M, Ohshima E, Itoh M, Nishikata N et al (2004) Effect of body mass index on overnight oximetry for the diagnosis of sleep apnea. Respir Med 98:421–427, doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.009 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levendowski DJ, Morgan TD, Patrickus JE, Westbrook PR, Berka C, Zavora T et al (2007) In-home evaluation of efficacy and titration of a mandibular advancement device for obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 11:139–147, doi: 10.1007/s11325-006-0094-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Erman MK, Stewart D, Einhorn D, Gordon N, Casal E (2007) Validation of the ApneaLink™ for the screening of sleep apnea: a novel and simple single-channel recording device. J Clin Sleep Med 3:387–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang Y, Teschler T, Weinreich G, Hess S, Wessendorf TE, Teschler H (2003) Validation of microMESAM as screening device for sleep disordered breathing. Pneumologie 57:734–740, doi: 10.1055/s-2003-81/2423 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hui Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alan A. Lowe
    • 1
  • Yuxing Bai
    • 2
  • Peter Hamilton
    • 3
  • John A. Fleetham
    • 3
  • Fernanda R. Almeida
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Health SciencesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of StomatologyThe University of Medical SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of MedicineThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Department of Oral Biological and Medical SciencesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations