Longitudinal comparison study of pressure relief (C-Flex™) vs. CPAP in OSA patients
- 254 Downloads
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices with the option of flexible pressure delivery (e.g., C-Flex) are thought to provide an improved degree of comfort and result in better therapeutic adherence while maintaining standard CPAP efficacy. The purpose of this study was to compare adherence and subjective measures of comfort between C-Flex and CPAP treatment.
The study was an international, multisite, single-blinded study with participants randomized to either C-Flex or CPAP. Participants completed subjective measures of sleepiness and comfort at baseline, and at 30-, 90-, and 180-day follow-ups. Additionally, compliance data were downloaded from the device at each follow-up. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess the effects of treatment.
There were 138 men and 46 women (average age of 48 ± 9.2, average Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 14.9 ± 3.6, and average diagnostic apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) of 51.9 ± 27.7). C-Flex and CPAP groups were comparable on baseline measures, achieved comparable AHI on titration, and had comparable PAP pressure requirements. C-Flex users had comparable average hours of use per night and total nights of use across the study, but had a trend (p < .07) toward achieving greater total hours of utilization. While both groups had comparable decreases in sleepiness, C-Flex users reported on visual analog scales greater comfort (64.3 vs. 57.4; p = .01).
The results of this study demonstrated that C-Flex has comparable resolution of respiratory indices and adherence. Furthermore, C-Flex users reported greater mask comfort.
KeywordsContinuous positive airway pressure CPAP C-Flex Expiratory pressure relief Sleepiness OSA
This study was funded by Respironics, Inc.
- 4.Kushida CA, Littner MR, Hirshkowitz M, Morgenthaler TI, Alessi CA, Bailey D, Boehlecke B, Brown TM, Coleman J Jr, Friedman L, Kapen S, Kapur VK, Kramer M, Lee-Chiong T, Owens J, Pancer JP, Swick TJ, Wise MS (2006) Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bi-level positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders. Sleep 29(3):375–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Rechtstaffen A, Kales A (eds) (1968). A manual of standardized terminology, techniques, and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects, vol 204. National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, pp 1–54Google Scholar
- 18.American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force (1999) Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. Sleep 22(5):667–689Google Scholar
- 19.SAS Institute Inc. (1999) SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
- 20.Rosenthal L, Dolan DC, Taylor D (2006) Response to CPAP therapy in sleepy and non-sleepy OSA patients. Sleep 29:A211Google Scholar
- 21.Henry D, Rosenthal L (2006) The significance of gender and partner-reporting on the lay-diagnosis, management, and treatment of apnea: a perspective from medical anthropology. Sleep 29:A204Google Scholar
- 23.Aloia MS, Goodwin MS, Velicer WF, Arnedt J, Zimmerman ME, Skrekas J, Harris S, Millman RP (2006) Individual difference in patterns of adherence to PAP in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 29:A590Google Scholar