Sleep and Breathing

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 353–357 | Cite as

Effects of nasal mask leak and heated humidification on nasal mucosa in the therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP)

  • Yvonne Fischer
  • Tilman Keck
  • Richard Leiacker
  • Ajnacska Rozsasi
  • Gerhard Rettinger
  • Philipp M. GruenEmail author
Original Article


The purpose of this study was to determine the objective short-term influence of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy, nasal mask leak (NML) and heated humidifiers (HH) to nasal conditioning of spontaneously breathing subjects. This was a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded day-time study. Eighteen healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. All subjects received nCPAP therapy for 60 min in three different conditions successively: (1) nCPAP without humidification, (2) nCPAP with a defined leakage of nasal mask (∅ 28.3 mm2) and (3) nCPAP with HH. Nasal humidity and temperature were measured in the anterior turbinate area using a miniaturized thermocouple and a relative humidity sensor. The measurements were accomplished at the beginning of therapy, after 60, 120 and 180 min. Absolute humidity (aH) in the anterior turbinate area decreased significantly (p= 0.0075) from 17.41 ± 3.81 mg/l (baseline) to 15.27 ± 2.21 mg/l (nCPAP alone). With attachment of a NML, aH decreased from 15.27 mg/l not significantly (p= 0.058) to 13.77 ± 2.28 mg/l (nCPAP and NML) compared to nCPAP alone. After addition of heated humidification to nCPAP, aH increased again from 13.77 mg/l significantly (p= 0.042) to 15.29 ± 3.51 mg/l (nCPAP and HH) compared to aH (nCPAP+NML). No difference was found between aH (nCPAP and HH) and aH (nCPAP alone). Airway temperature did not change significantly after application of nCPAP alone, nCPAP and NML, and nCPAP and HH. These data indicate that nCPAP therapy with NML tends to have more remarkable reduction of the nasal humidity than nCPAP therapy without NML. nCPAP with heated humidifier is able to compensate the dehydration effects induced by nCPAP therapy with NML by increasing the aH at the anterior turbinate area to the levels observed during breathing with nCPAP alone.


Nasal conditioning Humidity nCPAP Nasal mask leak Heated humidifier 


  1. 1.
    Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S (1993) The occurrence of sleep disordered breathing among middle aged adults. N Engl J Med 328:1230–1235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bearpark H, Elliott L, Grunstein R, Cullen S, Schneider H, Althaus W, Sullivan C (1995) Snoring and sleep apnea: a population study in Australian men. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151:1459–1465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olson LG, King MT, Hensley MJ, Saunders NA (1995) A community study of snoring and sleep disordered breathing. Prevalence. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152:711–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sullivan CE, Berthon-Jnes M, Issa FG, Eves L (1981) Reversal of obstructive sleep apnea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through the nose. Lancet 1:862–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abbey NC, Cooper KR, Kwentus JA (1989) Benefit of nasal CPAP in obstructive sleep apnea is due to positive pharyngeal pressure. Sleep 12:420–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffstein V, Viner S, Mateika S, Conway J (1992) Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with nasal continuous positive airway pressure: patient compliance, perception of benefits, and side effects. Am Rev Respir Dis 145:841–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kribbs NB, Pack AI, Kline LR, Smith PL, Schwartz AR, Schubert NM, Redline S, Henry JN, Getsy JE, Dinges DF (1993) Objective measurement of patterns of nasal CPAP use by patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 147:887–895PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engleman HM, Martin SE, Douglas NJ (1994) Compliance with CPAP therapy in patients with the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. Thorax 49:263–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pepin JL, Leger P, Veale D, Langevin B, Robert D, Levy P (1995) Side effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in sleep apnea syndrome: study of 193 patients in two French sleep centres. Chest 107:375–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verse T (2000) Side-effects of nasal CPAP ventilation therapy. HNO 48:706–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krieger J, Kurtz D, Petiau C, Sforza E, Trautmann D (1996) Long-term compliance with CPAP therapy in obstructive sleep apnea patients and in snorers. Sleep 146:385–387Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohki M, Usui N, Kanazawa H, Hara I, Kawano K (1996) Relationship between oral breathing and nasal obstruction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Acta Otolaryngol 523(suppl):228–230Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richards GN, Cistulli PA, Ungar G, Berthon-Jones M, Sullivan CE (1996) Mouth leak with nasal continuous positive airway pressure increases nasal airway resistance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154:182–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hayes MJ, McGregor FB, Roberts DN, Schroter RC, Pride NB (1995) Continuous nasal positive airway pressure with a mouth leak: effect on nasal mucosal blood flux and nasal geometry. Thorax 50:1179–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strohl KP, Arnold JL, Decker MJ, Hoekje PJ, McFadden ER (1992) Nasal flow-resistive responses to challenge with cold dry. J Appl Physiol 72:1243–1246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Massie CA, Hart RW, Peralez K, Richards GN (1999) Effects of humidification on nasal symptoms and compliance in sleep apnea patients using continuous positive airway pressure. Chest 116:403–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martins De Araújo MT, Vieira SB, Vasquez EC, Fleury B (2000) Heated humidification or face mask to prevent upper airway dryness during continuous positve airway pressure therapy. Chest 117:142–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wiest GH, Fuchs FS, Brueckl WM, Nusko G, Harsch IA, Hahn EG, Ficker JH (2000) In vivo efficacy of heated and non-heated humidifiers during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP)-therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea. Respir Med 9:364–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Randerath WJ, Meier J, Genger H, Domanski U, Rühle KH (2002) Efficacy of cold passover and heated humidification under continuous positive airway pressure. Eur Respir J 20:183–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Keck T, Leiacker R, Heinrich A, Kühnemann S, Rettinger G (2000) Humidity and temperature profile in the nasal cavity. Rhinology 38:167–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lindemann J, Leiacker R, Sikora T, Rettinger G, Keck T (2002) Impact of unilateral sinus surgery with resection of the turbinates by means of midfacial degloving on nasal air conditioning. Laryngoscope 112:2062–2066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rozsasi A, Leiacker R, Keck T (2004) Nasal conditioning in perennial allergic rhinitis after nasal allergen challenge. Clin Exp Allergy 34:1099–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ohkashi T, Sakaguchi M, Tsuda T (1998) Human perspiration measurement. Physiol Meas 19:449–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Togias A, Proud D, Lichtenstein LM, Adams GK 3rd, Norman PS, Kagey-Sobotka A, Naclerio RM (1988) The osmolality of nasal secretions increases when inflammatory mediators are released in response of cold dry air. Am Rev Respir Dis 137:625–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liener K, Leiacker R, Lindemann J, Rettinger G, Keck T (2003) Nasal mucosal temperature after exposure to cold, dry air and hot, humid air. Acta Otolaryngol 123:851–856PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yvonne Fischer
    • 1
  • Tilman Keck
    • 1
  • Richard Leiacker
    • 1
  • Ajnacska Rozsasi
    • 1
  • Gerhard Rettinger
    • 1
  • Philipp M. Gruen
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Laboratory for Sleep Research and Sleep MedicineUniversity of UlmUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations