Suboptimal Sensitivity and Specificity of PET and Other Gross Imaging Techniques in Assessing Lymph Node Metastasis
- 32 Downloads
In recent years, we have emphasized the limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) in imaging disorders that are beyond the capability of current instruments and available radiotracers [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. These include imaging islets, bacteria, plaques and tangles, and atherosclerotic plaques. The spatial resolution of PET has substantially improved over the past decade, and therefore, high-quality images can be generated, particularly with specialized instruments for brain and animal studies. However, when the spatial resolution of PET instruments that are designed to image the entire body compared to that of dedicated brain scanners, it becomes quite evident that image quality deteriorates substantially due to large field of view and volume of the structures assessed. In other words, specially designed PET scanners for the brain (and possibly other small organs such as the breast) can provide images with spatial resolutions at around 4–5 mm that are similar to that of phantom...
Key wordsMalignancy Cancer Lymph node metastasis PET Limitations Staging
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 10.Houseni M, Chamroonrat W, Basu S et al (2009) Usefulness of non attenuation corrected 18F-FDG-PET images for optimal assessment of disease activity in patients with lymphoma. Hell J Nucl Med 12:5–9Google Scholar
- 15.Fuster D, Chiang S, Johnson G, Schuchter LM, Zhuang H, Alavi A (2004) Is 18F-FDG PET more accurate than standard diagnostic procedures in the detection of suspected recurrent melanoma? J Nucl Med 45:1323–1327Google Scholar