Lacrimal Glands May Represent Organs at Risk for Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate Cancer with [177Lu]DKFZ-PSMA-617
- 609 Downloads
Calculating the absorbed dose is important for the determination of risk and therapeutic benefit of internal radiation therapy. The aim of this study was to perform image-based absorbed dose calculation for critical organs during the first cycle of [177Lu]DKFZ-PSMA-617 therapy in a small cohort of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
Nine patients with a history of prostate cancer documented by histopathology and radiologic evidence of metastatic diseases underwent radioligand therapy with [177Lu]DKFZ-PSMA-617. Conjugated planar whole-body scintigraphies acquired at 0.5, 24, 48, 72, and 168 h post-injection were analyzed by regions of interest, and time-activity curves were generated for various organs. Cumulated activities and residence times were calculated by bi-exponential fit of the time-activity curves. Mean absorbed doses were finally estimated using OLINDA/EXM1.1™. Additionally, the uncertainty when omitting the last measurement (168 h p.i.) was studied.
The following mean absorbed doses were calculated: 2.82 mGy/MBq for the lacrimal glands, 0.72 mGy/MBq for the salivary glands, 0.53 mGy/MBq for the kidneys, and 0.42 mGy/MBq for the nasal mucous membrane. Omitting the last measurement resulted in a mean deviation of 10 to 25 % for absorbed dose values as compared to the ones received by analyzing all measurements.
Absorbed organ doses of [177Lu]DKFZ-PSMA-617 therapy are not likely to be critical for kidneys, salivary glands, and the nasal mucous membrane. The lacrimal glands may represent the dose-limiting organs. Whole-body scintigraphy appears sufficient for dose estimation, but late measurements are mandatory, if accurate dose calculation is required.
Key wordsProstate cancer PSMA Dosimetry Lacrimal glands Radioligand radiation therapy
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 15.Bé MM, Chisté V, Dulie C, et al (2004) Table of radionuclides (Vol. 2-A = 151 to 242). Bureau international des poids et mesures, Pavillon de Breteuil, SèvresGoogle Scholar
- 18.Snyder WS, Fischer HL Jr, Ford MR, Warner GG (1969) Estimate of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom. MIRD pamphlet no. 5. J Nucl Med 10:7–52Google Scholar
- 19.Loevinger R, Budinger TF, Watson EE (1988) MIRD primer for absorbed dose calculations. Society of Nuclear Medicine, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 20.Snyder WS, Cook MJ, Nasset ES, et al (1979) Report of the task group on reference man. ICRP Publication 23Google Scholar