Molecular Imaging and Biology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 78–86 | Cite as

Replacing Vascular Corrosion Casting by In Vivo Micro-CT Imaging for Building 3D Cardiovascular Models in Mice

  • Bert Vandeghinste
  • Bram Trachet
  • Marjolijn Renard
  • Christophe Casteleyn
  • Steven Staelens
  • Bart Loeys
  • Patrick Segers
  • Stefaan Vandenberghe
Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate if in vivo micro-computed tomography (CT) is a reliable alternative to micro-CT scanning of a vascular corrosion cast. This would allow one to study the early development of cardiovascular diseases.

Procedures

Datasets using both modalities were acquired, segmented, and used to generate a 3D geometrical model from nine mice. As blood pool contrast agent, Fenestra VC-131 was used. Batson’s No. 17 was used as casting agent. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed on both datasets to quantify the difference in wall shear stress (WSS).

Results

Aortic arch diameters show 30% to 40% difference between the Fenestra VC-131 and the casted dataset. The aortic arch bifurcation angles show less than 20% difference between both datasets. Numerically computed WSS showed a 28% difference between both datasets.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that in vivo micro-CT imaging can provide an excellent alternative for vascular corrosion casting. This enables follow-up studies.

Key words

Fenestra In vivo Micro-CT Mice Vascular corrosion casting 3D model Wall shear stress 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research funded in part by a PhD grant to Bram Trachet of the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen). We would like to thank Philippe Joye and Steven Deleye for their help with the animal experiments.

References

  1. 1.
    Daugherty A, Manning MW, Cassis LA (2000) Angiotensin II promotes atherosclerotic lesions and aneurysms in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Clin Invest 105:1605–1612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reardon CA, Getz GS (2001) Mouse models of atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 12:167–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choudhury RP, Aguinaldo JG, Rong JX et al (2002) Atherosclerotic lesions in genetically modified mice quantified in vivo by non-invasive high resolution magnetic resonance microscopy. Atherosclerosis 162:315–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dietz HC, Loeys B, Carta L, Ramirez F (2005) Recent progress towards a molecular understanding of Marfan syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 139:4–9Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habashi JP, Judge DP, Holm TM et al (2006) Losartan, an AT1 antagonist, prevents aortic aneurysm in a mouse model of Marfan syndrome. Science 312:117–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loeys BL, Schwarze U, Holm T et al (2006) Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-beta receptor. N Engl J Med 355:788–798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nerem RM (1992) Vascular fluid mechanics, the arterial wall, and atherosclerosis. J Biomech Eng 114:274–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sawchuk AP, Unthank JL, Davis TE, Dalsing MCA (1994) Prospective, in vivo study of the relationship between blood flow hemodynamics and atherosclerosis in a hyperlipidemic swine model. J Vasc Surg 19:58–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boussel L, Rayz V, McCulloch C, Martin A, Acevedo-Bolton G, Lawton M (2008) Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 39:2997–3002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trachet B, Swillens A, Van Loo D et al (2009) The influence of aortic dimensions on calculated wall shear stress in the mouse aortic arch. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 12:491–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suo J, Ferrera DE, Sorescu D, Guldberg RE, Taylor WR, Giddens DP (2007) Hemodynamic shear stresses in mouse aortas: implications for atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27:346–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feintuch A, Ruengsakulrach P, Lin A et al (2007) Hemodynamics in the mouse aortic arch as assessed by MRI, ultrasound and numerical modeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292:H884–H892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mukundan S, Ghaghada KB, Badea CT et al (2006) A liposomal nanoscale contrast agent for preclinical CT in mice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:300–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Willekens I, Lahoutte T, Buls N et al (2009) Time-course of contrast enhancement in spleen and liver with eXIA 160, Fenestra LC, and VC. Mol Imaging Biol 11:128–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parker DL (1982) Optimal short scan convolution reconstruction for fan beam CT. Med Phys 9:254–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ford NL, Nikolov HN, Norley CJD et al (2005) Prospective respiratory-gated micro-CT of free breathing rodents. Med Phys 32:2888–2898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ford NL, Wheatley AR, Holdsworth DW, Drangova M (2007) Optimization of a retrospective technique for respiratory-gated high speed micro-CT of free-breathing rodents. Phys Med Biol 52:5749–5769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hodde KC, Miodoński A, Bakker C, Veltman WAM (1977) Scanning electron microscopy of microcorrosion casts with special attention on the arterio-venous differences and application to the rat’s cochlea. Scan Electron Microsc 2:477–484Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sambach SJ, Bag B, Groden C, Schilling L, Brockmann MA (2010) Vascular imaging in small rodents using micro-CT. Methods 50:26–35Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kratky RG, Roach MR (1984) Shrinkage of Batson’s and its relevance to vascular casting. Atherosclerosis 51:339–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Casteleyn C, Trachet B, Van Loo D et al (2010) Validation of the murine aortic arch as a model to study human vascular diseases. J Anat 216:563–571Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moore JA, Rutt BK, Karlik SJ, Yin K, Ethier CR (1999) Computational blood flow modeling based on in vivo measurements. Ann Biomed Eng 27:627–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hodde KC (1981) Cephalic vascular patterns in the rat: a scanning electron microscopic (SEM) study of casts. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 14–15, 32–33, 66Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Molecular Imaging and Society for Molecular Imaging 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bert Vandeghinste
    • 1
  • Bram Trachet
    • 2
  • Marjolijn Renard
    • 3
  • Christophe Casteleyn
    • 4
  • Steven Staelens
    • 1
  • Bart Loeys
    • 3
  • Patrick Segers
    • 2
  • Stefaan Vandenberghe
    • 1
  1. 1.IBITECH-MEDISIPGhent University—IBBTGhentBelgium
  2. 2.IBITECH-bioMMedaGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  3. 3.Centre for Medical GeneticsGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  4. 4.Department of MorphologyGhent UniversityMerelbekeBelgium

Personalised recommendations