Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Evaluation of specific gravity as normalization strategy for cattle urinary metabolome analysis

  • 527 Accesses

  • 21 Citations

Abstract

Urine is an ideal biofluid for metabolomics studies since it is obtained noninvasively, and its composition is affected by genetic and environmental factors reflecting the physiology of multiple organs. However, urine dilution effects and instrumental variation from the analytical method play a significant confounding role when one attempts to characterize biological and physiological factors through NMR and MS measurements of small molecule concentrations. Several normalization approaches have been used for urinary metabolomics studies and normalization to osmolality or to total useful MS signal have been proposed. When dealing with urinary metabolome analysis in cattle, freeze-drying (FD) is the method commonly used for normalization purposes. Herein, normalization to specific gravity, which provides a fair estimation of urine osmolality, was compared to the time consuming FD step and to the normalization to total useful MS signal in order to assess if this approach could be used as normalization strategy to differentiate control from anabolic treated animals. The results revealed that ~80 % of the metabolites detected as constituting the acquired MS fingerprints for the freeze-dried samples and for the samples normalized to both specific gravity (SG) and total useful MS signal were in common. In addition, similar information from the multivariate statistical analysis was obtained by both normalization approaches. We demonstrate, therefore, that SG can be used as normalization approach for urinary metabolome analysis in cattle resulting in a high sample throughput procedure when compared with the FD step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Chadha, V., Garg, U., & Alon, U. S. (2001). Measurement of urinary concentration: A critical appraisal of methodologies. Pediatric Nephrology, 16(4), 374–382.

  2. Chang, M. S., Ji, Q., Zhang, J., & El-Shourbagy, T. A. (2007). Historical review of sample preparation for chromatographic bioanalysis: Pros and cons. Drug Development Research, 68(3), 107–133.

  3. Constantinou, M. A., Papakonstantinou, E., Spraul, M., Sevastiadou, S., Costalos, C., Koupparis, M. A., et al. (2005). 1H NMR-based metabonomics for the diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism in urine. Analytica Chimica Acta, 542(2), 169–177.

  4. Council Directive 88/146/EEC prohibiting the use livestock farming of certain substances having a hormonal action (1988). Official Journal of European Communities, L070, 16–18.

  5. Courant, F., Pinel, G., Bichon, E., Monteau, F., Antignac, J.-P., & Le Bizec, B. (2009). Development of a metabolomic approach based on liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry to screen for a clenbuterol abuse in calves. Analyst, 134, 1637–1646.

  6. Craig, A., Cloareo, O., Holmes, E., Nicholson, J. K., & Lindon, J. C. (2006). Scaling and normalization effects in NMR spectroscopic metabonomic data sets. Analytical Chemistry, 78(7), 2262–2267.

  7. Dervilly-Pinel, G., Courant, F., Chereau, S., Royer, A. L., Boyard-Kieken, F., Antignac, J. P., et al. (2012). Metabolomics in food analysis: Application to the control of forbidden substances. Drug Testing and Analysis, 4, 59–69.

  8. Dumas, M. E., Canlet, C., Andre, F., Vercauteren, J., & Paris, A. (2002a). Metabonomic assessment of physiological disruptions using H-1-C-13 HMBC-NMR spectroscopy combined with pattern recognition procedures performed on filtered variables. Analytical Chemistry, 74(10), 2261–2273.

  9. Dumas, M. E., Debrauwer, L., Beyet, L., André, F., Paris, A., & Tabet, J.-C. (2002b). Analyzing the physiological signature of anabolic steroids in cattle urine using pyrolysis/metastable atom bombardment mass spectrometry ant pattern recognition. Analytical Chemistry, 74, 5393–5404.

  10. Fernandez-Peralbo, M. A., & Luque de Castro, M. D. (2012). Preparation of urine samples prior to targeted or untargeted metabolomics mass-spectrometry analysis. Trac-Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 41, 75–85.

  11. Kieken, F., Pinel, G., Antignac, J.-P., Paris, A. C., Garcia, P., Popot, M.-A., et al. (2011). Generation and processing of urinary and plasmatic metabolomic fingerprints to reveal an illegal administration of recombinant equine growth hormone from LC-HRMS measurements. Metabolomics, 7, 84–93.

  12. Meyer, H. H. D. (2001). Biochemistry and physiology of anabolic hormones used for improvement of meat production. APMIS, 109, 1–8.

  13. Miller, R. C., Brindle, E., Holman, D. J., Shofer, J., Klein, N. A., Soules, M. R., et al. (2004). Comparison of specific gravity and creatinine for normalizing urinary reproductive hormone concentrations. Clinical Chemistry, 50(5), 924–932.

  14. Nicholson, J. K., & Lindon, J. C. (2008). Systems biology: Metabonomics. Nature, 455(7216), 1054–1056.

  15. Patti, G. J., Tautenhahn, R., & Siuzdak, G. (2012). Meta-analysis of untargeted metabolomic data from multiple profiling experiments. Nature Protocols, 7(3), 508–516.

  16. Pinel, G., Weigel, S., Antignac, J.-P., Mooney, M. H., Elliot, C., Nielen, M. W. F., et al. (2010). Targeted and untargeted profiling of biological fluids to screen for anabolic practices in cattle. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 29, 1269–1280.

  17. Pinel, G., Weigel, S., Lommen, A., Chereau, S., Rambaud, L., Essers, M. L., et al. (2011). Assessment of two complementary LC-HRMS metabolomics strategies for the screening of anabolic steroid treatment in calves. Analytica Chimica Acta, 700, 144–154.

  18. Rijk, J. C. W., Lommen, A., Essers, M. L., Groot, M. J., Van Hende, J. M., Doeswijk, T. G., et al. (2009). Metabolomics approach to anabolic steroid urine profiling of bovines treated with prohormones. Analytical Chemistry, 81(16), 6879–6888.

  19. Smith, C. A., Want, E. J., O’Maille, G., Abagyan, R., & Siuzdak, G. (2006). XCMS: Processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching and identification. Analytical Chemistry, 78(3), 779–787.

  20. Tautenhahn, R., Bottcher, C., & Neumann, S. (2008). Highly sensitive feature detection for high resolution LC/MS. BMC Bioinaformatics, 9, 504.

  21. Tautenhahn, R., Patti, G. J., Kalisiak, E., Miyamoto, T., Schmidt, M., Lo, F. Y., et al. (2011). metaXCMS: Second-order analysis of untargeted metabolomics data. Analytical Chemistry, 83(3), 696–700.

  22. van der Kloet, F. M., Bobeldijk, I., Verheij, E. R., & Jellema, R. H. (2009). Analytical error reduction using single point calibration for accurate and precise metabolomic phenotyping. Journal of Proteome Research, 8, 5132–5141.

  23. Warrack, B. M., Hnatyshyn, S., Ott, K. H., Reily, M. D., Sanders, M., Zhang, H. Y., et al. (2009). Normalization strategies for metabonomic analysis of urine samples. Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 877(5–6), 547–552.

  24. Westerhuis, J. A., Hoefsloot, H. C. J., Smit, S., Vis, D. J., Smilde, A. K., van Velzen, E. J. J., et al. (2008). Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Metabolomics, 4(1), 81–89.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (RF-IZV-2008-1175188). Authors thank Merck Animal Health for kindly providing the implant Revalor-XS®.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest in the submission of this manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Gaud Dervilly-Pinel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacob, C.C., Dervilly-Pinel, G., Biancotto, G. et al. Evaluation of specific gravity as normalization strategy for cattle urinary metabolome analysis. Metabolomics 10, 627–637 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-013-0604-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Urine
  • Normalization
  • Specific gravity
  • Metabolomics
  • LC-HRMS