Advertisement

Metabolomics

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 186–200 | Cite as

Metabolomics demonstrates divergent responses of two Eucalyptus species to water stress

  • Charles R. Warren
  • Ismael Aranda
  • F. Javier Cano
Original Article

Abstract

Past studies of water stress in Eucalyptus spp. generally highlighted the role of fewer than five “important” metabolites, whereas recent metabolomic studies on other genera have shown tens of compounds are affected. There are currently no metabolite profiling data for responses of stress-tolerant species to water stress. We used GC–MS metabolite profiling to examine the response of leaf metabolites to a long (2 month) and severe (Ψpredawn < −2 MPa) water stress in two species of the perennial tree genus Eucalyptus (the mesic Eucalyptus pauciflora and the semi-arid Eucalyptus dumosa). Polar metabolites in leaves were analysed by GC–MS and inorganic ions by capillary electrophoresis. Pressure–volume curves and metabolite measurements showed that water stress led to more negative osmotic potential and increased total osmotically active solutes in leaves of both species. Water stress affected around 30–40% of measured metabolites in E. dumosa and 10–15% in E. pauciflora. There were many metabolites that were affected in E. dumosa but not E. pauciflora, and some that had opposite responses in the two species. For example, in E. dumosa there were increases in five acyclic sugar alcohols and four low-abundance carbohydrates that were unaffected by water stress in E. pauciflora. Re-watering increased osmotic potential and decreased total osmotically active solutes in E. pauciflora, whereas in E. dumosa re-watering led to further decreases in osmotic potential and increases in total osmotically active solutes. This experiment has added several extra dimensions to previous targeted analyses of water stress responses in Eucalyptus, and highlights that even species that are closely related (e.g. congeners) may respond differently to water stress and re-watering.

Keywords

Drought Metabolome Osmotic adjustment Water relations GC–MS Plant Water stress 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Discovery Grant and QEII Fellowship from the Australian Research Council (CR Warren), and a major equipment grant from The University of Sydney. PhD fellowship from Regional Government of Madrid (FJ Cano) and in the frame of the project “SUM2008-00004-C03-01”, funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain. Dr Maria Taranto is warmly thanked for assisting with preparation of samples.

Supplementary material

11306_2011_299_MOESM1_ESM.doc (454 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 453 kb)

References

  1. Abebe, T., Guenzi, A. C., Martin, B., & Cushman, J. C. (2003). Tolerance of mannitol-accumulating transgenic wheat to water stress and salinity. Plant Physiology, 131, 1748–1755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, M. A., Attiwill, P. M., & Wang, L. M. (1995). Effects of phosphorus supply on growth and nitrogen fractions in xylem sap and foliage of Eucalyptus regnans (Muell. F.), Eucalyptus nitens (Maiden) and Eucalyptus globulus (Labill) seedlings—implications for herbivory. Trees-Structure and Function, 9, 324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, M. A., Chen, Z. L., Landman, P., & Colmer, T. D. (1999). Simultaneous determination by capillary gas chromatography of organic acids, sugars, and sugar alcohols in plant tissue extracts as their trimethylsilyl derivatives. Analytical Biochemistry, 266, 77–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, M. A., Richter, A., Hill, A. K., & Colmer, T. D. (2005). Salt tolerance in Eucalyptus spp.: identity and response of putative osmolytes. Plant Cell and Environment, 28, 772–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allan, W. L., Simpson, J. P., Clark, S. M., & Shelp, B. J. (2008). γ-hydroxybutyrate accumulation in Arabidopsis and tobacco plants is a general response to abiotic stress: putative regulation by redox balance and glyoxylate reductase isoforms. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 2555–2564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arndt, S. K., Livesley, S. J., Merchant, A., Bleby, T. M., & Grierson, P. F. (2008). Quercitol and osmotic adaptation of field-grown Eucalyptus under seasonal drought stress. Plant Cell and Environment, 31, 915–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, N. M., & Naylor, A. W. (1966). Amino acid and protein synthesis in Bermuda grass during water stress. Plant Physiology, 41, 1222–1230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, R. N., & Wallsgrove, R. M. (1994). Secondary metabolites in plant defense-mechanisms. New Phytologist, 127, 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohnert, H. J., & Shen, B. (1999). Transformation and compatible solutes. Scientia Horticulturae, 78, 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlton, A. J., Donarski, J. A., Harrison, M., et al. (2008). Responses of the pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaf metabolome to drought stress assessed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Metabolomics, 4, 312–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, 30, 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, Z. L., Landman, P., Colmer, T. D., & Adams, M. A. (1998). Simultaneous analysis of amino and organic acids in extracts of plant leaves as tert-butyldimethylsilyl derivatives by capillary gas chromatography. Analytical Biochemistry, 259, 203–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Close, D. C., & Beadle, C. L. (2003). Alternate energy dissipation? Phenolic metabolites and the xanthophyll cycle. Journal of Plant Physiology, 160, 431–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dixon, R. A., & Paiva, N. L. (1995). Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell, 7, 1085–1097.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dreyer, E., Bousquet, F., & Ducrey, M. (1990). Use of pressure volume curves in water relation analysis on woody shoots: influence of rehydration and comparison of four European oak species. Annals of Forest Science, 47, 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiehn, O. (2002). Metabolomics—the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Molecular Biology, 48, 155–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foito, A., Byrne, S. L., Shepherd, T., Stewart, D., & Barth, S. (2009). Transcriptional and metabolic profiles of Lolium perenne L. genotypes in response to a PEG-induced water stress. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 7, 719–732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham, T. L., & Graham, M. Y. (1996). Signaling in soybean phenylpropanoid responses. Dissection of primary, secondary, and conditioning effects of light, wounding and elicitor treatments. Plant Physiology, 110, 1123–1133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Guarnaschelli, A. B., Lemcoff, J. H., Prystupa, P., & Basci, S. O. (2003). Responses to drought preconditioning in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. provenances. Trees-Structure and Function, 17, 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hare, P. D., Cress, W. A., & Van Staden, J. (1998). Dissecting the roles of osmolyte accumulation during stress. Plant Cell and Environment, 21, 535–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hattori, S., Yoshida, S., & Hasegawa, M. (1954). Occurrence of shikimic acid in the leaves of gymnosperms. Physiologia Plantarum, 7, 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hillis, W. E. (1959). Shikimic acid in the leaves of Eucalyptus sieberiana f muell. Journal of Experimental Botany, 10, 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hinckley, T. M., Duhme, F., Hinckley, A. R., & Richter, H. (1980). Water Relations of Drought Hardy Shrubs - Osmotic Potential and Stomatal Reactivity. Plant Cell and Environment, 3, 131–140.Google Scholar
  24. Hsiao, T. C. (1973). Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 24, 519–570.Google Scholar
  25. Jaindl, M., & Popp, M. (2006). Cyclitols protect glutamine synthetase and malate dehydrogenase against heat induced deactivation and thermal denaturation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 345, 761–765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jakobsen, A. N., Aasen, I. M., & Strom, A. R. (2007). Endogenously synthesized (−)-proto-quercitol and glycine betaine are principal compatible solutes of Schizochytrium sp strain S8 (ATCC 20889) and three new isolates of phylogenetically related thraustochytrids. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73, 5848–5856.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joly, R. L., & Zaerr, J. B. (1987). Alteration of cell-wall water content and elasticity in Douglas fir during periods of water deficit. Plant Physiology, 83, 418–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karakas, B., OziasAkins, P., Stushnoff, C., Suefferheld, M., & Rieger, M. (1997). Salinity and drought tolerance of mannitol-accumulating transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell and Environment, 20, 609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keegstra, K., Talmadge, K. W., Bauer, W. D., & Albersheim, P. (1973). The Structure of Plant Cell Walls: III. A model of the walls of suspension-cultured sycamore cells based on the interconnections of the macromolecular components. Plant Physiology, 51, 188–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knights, B. A. (1967). Identification of plant sterols using combined GLC/mass spectrometry. Journal of Gas Chromatography, 5, 273.Google Scholar
  31. Kramer, P. J., & Boyer, J. S. (1995). Water relations of plants and soils. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kubiske, M. E., & Abrams, M. D. (1991). Seasonal, diurnal and rehydration-induced variation of pressure-volume relationships in Pseudotsuga menziesii. Physiologia Plant, 83, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ladiges, P. Y. (1975). Some Aspects of tissue water relations in 3 populations of Eucalyptus viminalis Labill. New Phytologist, 75, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lawlor, D. W., & Cornic, G. (2002). Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant Cell and Environment, 25, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lemcoff, J. H., Guarnaschelli, A. B., Garau, A. M., & Prystupa, P. (2002). Elastic and osmotic adjustments in rooted cuttings of several clones of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. from southeastern Australia after a drought. Flora, 197, 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li, T. H., & Li, S. H. (2005). Leaf responses of micropropagated apple plants to water stress: nonstructural carbohydrate composition and regulatory role of metabolic enzymes. Tree Physiology, 25, 495–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, C. X., Zhong, Z. C., Geng, Y. H., & Schneider, R. (2010). Comparative studies on physiological and biochemical adaptation of Taxodium distichum and Taxodium ascendens seedlings to different soil water regimes. Plant and Soil, 329, 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lippold, F., Sanchez, D. H., Musialak, M., et al. (2009). AtMyb41 regulates transcriptional and metabolic responses to osmotic Stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 149, 1761–1772.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lisec, J., Schauer, N., Kopka, J., Willmitzer, L., & Fernie, A. R. (2006). Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nature Protocols, 1, 387–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu, H. C., Li, Q. W., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, Y. H. (2009). Analysis of (-)-shikimic acid in Chinese star anise by GC-MS with selected ion monitoring. Chromatographia, 69, 339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Macfarlane, C., White, D. A., & Adams, M. A. (2004). The apparent feed-forward response to vapour pressure deficit of stomata in droughted, field-grown Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Plant Cell and Environment, 27, 1268–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marasu, A., Secuen, H., Sutbeyaz, Y., & Balci, M. (1998). A convenient synthesis of talo-quercitol (1-Deoxy-neo-Inositol) and vibo-quercitol (1-Deoxy-myo-Inositol) via ene reaction of singlet oxygen. Journal of Organic Chemistry, 63, 2039–2041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marsh, N. R., & Adams, M. A. (1995). Decline of Eucalyptus tereticornis near Bairnsdale, Victoria: Insect Herbivory and Nitrogen Fractions in Sap and Foliage. Australian Journal of Botany, 43, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mawhinney, T. P., Robinett, R. S. R., Atalay, A., & Madson, M. A. (1986). Analysis of amino-acids as their tert-butyldimethylsilyl derivatives by gas-liquid-chromatography and mass-spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography, 358, 231–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Medrano, H., Bota, J., Abadia, A., Sampol, B., Escalona, J. M., & Flexas, J. (2002). Effects of drought on light-energy dissipation mechanisms in high-light-acclimated, field-grown grapevines. Functional Plant Biology, 29, 1197–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Merchant, A., & Adams, M. (2005). Stable osmotica in Eucalyptus spathulata - responses to salt and water deficit stress. Functional Plant Biology, 32, 797–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Merchant, A., Arndt, S.K., Douglas, M.R., et al. (2010). Seasonal changes in carbohydrates, cyclitols, and water relations of 3 field grown Eucalyptus species from contrasting taxonomy on a common site. Annals of Forest Science, 67. doi: 10.1051/forest/2009085.
  48. Merchant, A., Richter, A., Popp, M., & Adams, M. A. (2006a). Targeted metabolic profiling provides a functional link among eucalypt taxonomy, physiology and evolution. Phytochemistry, 67, 402–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Merchant, A., Tausz, M., Arndt, S. K., & Adams, M. A. (2006b). Cyclitols and carbohydrates in leaves and roots of 13 Eucalyptus species suggest contrasting physiological responses to water deficit. Plant Cell and Environment, 29, 2017–2029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morgan, J. M. (1984). Osmoregulation and Water-Stress in Higher-Plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 35, 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Munns, R. (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell and Environment, 25, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Myers, B. A., & Neales, T. F. (1986). Osmotic Adjustment, Induced by Drought, in Seedlings of 3 Eucalyptus Species. Aust. Journal of Plant Physiology, 13, 597–603.Google Scholar
  53. Nanjo, T., Kobayashi, M., Yoshiba, Y., et al. (1999). Biological functions of proline in morphogenesis and osmotolerance revealed in antisense transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Journal, 18, 185–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Orthen, B., & Popp, M. (2000). Cyclitols as cryoprotectants for spinach and chickpea thylakoids. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 44, 125–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Plouvier, V. (1963). Distribution of aliphatic polyols and cyclitols. In T. Swain (Ed.), Chemical plant taxonomy (pp. 313–336). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rawat, J. S., & Banerjee, S. P. (1998). The influence of salinity on growth, biomass production and photosynthesis of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. and Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. seedlings. Plant and Soil, 205, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Robichaux, B. S. (1984). Variation in the tissue water relations of two sympatric Hawaiian Dubautia species and their natural hybrid. Oecologia, 65, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roessner, U., Wagner, C., Kopka, J., Trethewey, R. N., & Willmitzer, L. (2000). Simultaneous analysis of metabolites in potato tuber by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Plant Journal, 23, 131–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salekdeh, G. H., Siopongco, J., Wade, L. J., Ghareyazie, B., & Bennett, J. (2002). A proteomic approach to analyzing drought- and salt-responsiveness in rice. Field Crops Research, 76, 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sanchez, D. H., Szymanski, J., Erban, A., Udvardi, M. K., & Kopka, J. (2010). Mining for robust transcriptional and metabolic responses to long-term salt stress: a case study on the model legume Lotus japonicus. Plant Cell and Environment, 33, 468–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schauer, N., Steinhauser, D., Strelkov, S., et al. (2005). GC-MS libraries for the rapid identification of metabolites in complex biological samples. FEBS Letters, 579, 1332–1337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shao, H. B., Chu, L. Y., Jaleel, C. A., Manivannan, P., Panneerselvam, R., & Shao, M. A. (2009). Understanding water deficit stress-induced changes in the basic metabolism of higher plants - biotechnologically and sustainably improving agriculture and the ecoenvironment in arid regions of the globe. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 29, 131–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shelp, B. J., Bown, A. W., & McLean, M. D. (1999). Metabolism and functions of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Trends in Plant Science, 4, 446–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shen, B., Hohmann, S., Jensen, R. G., & Bohnert, H. J. (1999). Roles of sugar alcohols in osmotic stress adaptation. Replacement of glycerol by mannitol and sorbitol in yeast. Plant Physiology, 121, 45–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Singh, K., Kumar, S., Rani, A., Gulati, A., & Ahuja, P. (2009). Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) and catechins (flavan-3-ols) accumulation in tea. Funct. Integrated Genomics, 9, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sumner, L. W., Amberg, A., Barrett, D., et al. (2007). Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis. Metabolomics, 3, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tuomela, K. (1997). Leaf water relations in six provenances of Eucalyptus microtheca: A greenhouse experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 92, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Turner, N. C. (1986). Adaptation to water deficits—a changing perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 13, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Turner, N. C., & Jones, M. M. (1980). Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment: a review and evaluation. In N. C. Turner & P. J. Kramer (Eds.), Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress (pp. 155–172). New York: Wiley-InterScience.Google Scholar
  70. Tyree, M. T., Cheung, Y. N. S., MacGregor, M. E., & Talbot, A. J. B. (1978). The characteristics of seasonal and ontogenetic changes in the tissue-water relations of Acer, Populus, Tsuga and Picea. Canadian Journal of Botany, 56, 635–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tyree, M. T., & Hammel, H. T. (1972). Measurement of the turgor pressure and the water relations of plants by the pressure-bomb technique. Journal of Experimental Botany, 23, 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Urakami, K., Zangiacomi, V., Yamaguchi, K., & Kusuhara, M. (2010). Quantitative metabolome profiling of Illicium anisatum by capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Biomedical Research-Tokyo, 31, 161–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Warren, C. R. (2009). Why is uptake of inorganic N favoured by high temperatures and amino acids by low temperatures? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41, 778–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Warren, C. R., & Adams, M. A. (2004). Capillary electrophoresis of the major anions and cations in leaf extracts of woody species. Phytochemical Analysis, 15, 407–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Warren, C. R., Bleby, T. M., & Adams, M. A. (2007). Changes in gas exchange versus leaf solutes as a means to cope with summer drought in Eucalyptus marginata. Oecologia, 154, 1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Xue, G. P., McIntyre, C. L., Glassop, D., & Shorter, R. (2008). Use of expression analysis to dissect alterations in carbohydrate metabolism in wheat leaves during drought stress. Plant Molecular Biology, 67, 197–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zwiazek, J. J. (1991). Cell-wall changes in white spruce (Picea glauca) needles subjected to repeated drought stress. Physiologia Plant, 82, 513–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles R. Warren
    • 1
  • Ismael Aranda
    • 2
  • F. Javier Cano
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences, Heydon-Laurence Building A08University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Centro de Investigación ForestalInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)MadridSpain
  3. 3.Unidad Docente de Anatomía, Fisiología y Genética Forestal, E.T.S.I. MontesUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations