, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 39–51 | Cite as

Application of metabolomics to genotype and phenotype discrimination of birch trees grown in a long-term open-field experiment

  • Vladimir Ossipov
  • Svetlana Ossipova
  • Valery Bykov
  • Elina Oksanen
  • Julia Koricheva
  • Erkki Haukioja
Original Article


The principal objectives of the study were to develop metabolomics tool and to test its efficiency for discrimination and biochemical pattern recognition of genotypes and phenotypes of silver birch trees (Betula pendula Roth). In the experiment were used two birch genotypes (GT 2 and GT 5) that have been grown over seven years on the two open fields A and B. The metabolomics tool was applied also to study biochemical responses of the GT 2 to elevated (1.5 × ambient) concentration of ozone as an environmental stress factor. These trees were treated with ozone over seven years using an open-air exposure system. The developed metabolomics tool was based on the analyses of lipophilic and polar compounds of birch leaves with GC-MS and HPLC-DAD (polar phenolics only). The metabolome database included 331 chemical traits and was analyzed with descriptive and multivariate statistics. Application of cluster and principle component analyses clearly discriminated genetically different birch trees. In addition, the genotype clusters were further divided into two subclusters corresponding to trees from field A and field B. Formation of these phenotypes was due to the differences in some environmental conditions between the field A and field B. Biochemical discrimination between phenotypes of control and ozone-treated birch trees of GT 2 was found also. However, distances between these phenotypes, as well as between phenotypes of control trees from the field A and field B were found to be considerably smaller than between birch genotypes. Metabolites with the largest contribution to birch genotype/phenotype discrimination were determined and some were identified.


Metabolomics GC-MS HPLC-DAD Silver birch Biochemical response Environmental stress Ozone 



This work was funded by the Academy of Finland, projects 201073 (VO) and 51758 (EO). We thank Timo Oksanen for ozone fumigations.


  1. Choi, H.-K., Choi, Y., Verberne, M., Lefeber, A. W. M., Erkelens, C., & Verpoorte, R. (2004). Metabolic fingerprinting of wild type and transgenic tobacco plants by 1H NMR and multivariate analysis technique. Phytochemistry, 65, 857–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Daub, C. O., Kloska, S., & Selbig, J. (2003). MetaGeneAlyse: Analysis of integrated transcriptional and metabolite data. Bioinformatics, 19, 2332–2333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fiehn, O. (2002). Metabolomics––the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Molecular Biology, 48, 155–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fiehn, O., Kopka, J., Dörmann, P., Altman, T., Trethewey, R., & Willmitzer, L. (2000). Metabolite profiling for functional genomics. Nature Biotechnology, 18, 1157–1161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Halket, J., Przyborowska, A., Stein, S., Down, S., & Chalmers, R. (1999). Deconvolution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry of urinary organic acid––potential for pattern recognition and automated identification of metabolite disorders. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 13, 279–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haukioja, E., Ossipov, V., Koricheva, J., Honkanen, T., Larsson, S., & Lempa, K. (1998). Biosynthetic origin of carbon-based secondary compounds: Cause of variable responses of woody plants to fertilization? Chemoecology, 8, 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ingestad, T. (1962). Macro element nutrition of pine, spruce and birch seedling in nutrient solutions. Meddelande Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut, 51, 1–133.Google Scholar
  8. Jolliffe, I. T. (1986). Principal component analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Karnosky, D. F., Werner, H., Holopainen, T., Percy, K., Oksanen, T., Oksanen, E., Heerdt, C., Fabian, P., Nagy, J., Heilman, W., Cox, R., Nelson, N., & Matyssek, R. (2007). Free-air exposure systems to scale up ozone research to mature trees. Plant Biology, 9, 181–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Kroone, H., Huber, H., Stuefer, J., & van Groenendael, J. (2005). A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. The New Phytologist, 166, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kontunen-Soppela, S., Ossipov, V., Ossipova, S., & Oksanen, E. (2007). Shift in birch leaf metabolome and carbon allocation during long-term open-field ozone exposure. Global Change Biology, 13, 1053–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laurila, T., Tuovinen, J.-P., Tarvainen, V., & Simpson, D. (2004). Trends and scenarios of ground-level ozone concentrations in Finland. Boreal Environment Research, 9, 167–184.Google Scholar
  13. Lavola, A., Julkunen-Tiitto, R., & Pääkkönen, E. (1994). Does ozone stress change the primary or secondary metabolites of birch (Betula pendula Roth)? The New Phytologist, 126, 637–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loponen, J., Ossipov, V., Lempa, K., Haukioja, E., & Pihlaja, K. (1998). Concentrations and among-compound correlations of individual phenolics in white birch leaves under air pollution stress. Chemosphere, 36, 1445–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oksanen, E. (2003). Responses of selected birch (Betula pendula). clones to ozone change over time. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26, 875–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ossipov, V., Haukioja, E., Ossipova, S., Hanhimäki, S., & Pihlaja, K. (2001). Phenolic and phenolic-related factors as determinants of suitability of mountain birch leaves to an herbivorous insect. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 29, 223–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ossipov, V., Nurmi, K., Loponen, J., Haukioja, E., & Pihlaja, K. (1996). HPLC separation and identification of phenolic compounds from leaves of Betula pubescens and Betula pendula. Journal of Chromatography. A, 721, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ossipov, V., Nurmi, K., Loponen, J., Prokopiev, N., Haukioja, E., & Pihlaja, K. (1995). HPLC isolation and identification of flavonoids from white birch Betula pubescens leaves. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 23, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ossipova S., Ossipov, V., Haukioja, E., Loponen, J., & Pihlaja, K. (2001). Proanthocyanidins from mountain birch leaves: Quantitation and properties. Phytochemical Analysis, 12, 128–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pell, E. J., Schlagnhaufer, C. D., & Arteca, R. N. (1997). Ozone-induced oxidative stress: mechanisms of action and reaction. Physiologia Plantarum, 100, 264–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peltonen, P. A., Vapaavuori, E., & Julkunen-Tiitto, R. (2005). Accumulation of phenolic compounds in birch leaves is changed by elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. Global Change Biology, 11, 1305–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Riikonen, J., Lindsberg, M.-M., Holopainen, T., Oksanen, E., Lappi, J., Peltonen, P., & Vapaavuori, E. (2004). Silver birch and climate change: variable growth and carbon allocation responses to elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide and ozone. Tree Physiology, 24, 1227–1237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Roessner, U., Luedemann, A., Brust, D., Fiehn, O., Linke, T., Willmitzer, L., & Fernie, A. (2001). Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant system. Plant Cell, 13, 11–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saleem, A., Loponen, J., Pihlaja, K., & Oksanen, E. (2001). Effects of long-term open-field ozone exposure on leaf phenolics of European silver birch (Betula pendula Roth). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27, 1049–1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salminen, J.-P., Ossipov, V., Loponen, J., Haukioja, E., & Pihlaja, K. (1999). Characterisation of hydrolysable tannins from leaves of Betula pubescens by high-performance liquid chromatography––mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography. A, 864, 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sumner, L., Mendes, P., & Dixon, R. (2003). Plant metabolomics: Large-scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era. Phytochemistry, 62, 817–836.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, J., King, R. D., Altmann, T., & Fiehn, O. (2002). Application of metabolomics to plant genotype discrimination using statistics and machine learning. Bioinformatics, 18, 241–248.Google Scholar
  28. Trethewey, R. (2001). Gene discovery via metabolic profiling. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 12, 135–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vinocur, B., & Altman, A. (2005). Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: Achievements and limitations. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 16, 123–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Valkama, E., Koricheva, J., Ossipov, V., Ossipova, S., Haukioja, E., & Pihlaja, K. (2005). Delayed induced responses of birch glandular trichomes and leaf surface lipophilic compounds to mechanical defoliation and simulated browsing. Oecologia, 146, 385–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Valkama, E., Koricheva, J., & Oksanen, E. (2007). Effects of elevated O3, alone and in combination with elevated CO2, on tree leaf chemistry and insect herbivore performance: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 13, 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang, W., Vinocur, B., Shoseyov, O., & Altman, A. (2004). Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress responses. Trends in Plant Science, 9, 244–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Ossipov
    • 1
  • Svetlana Ossipova
    • 1
  • Valery Bykov
    • 2
  • Elina Oksanen
    • 3
  • Julia Koricheva
    • 4
  • Erkki Haukioja
    • 5
  1. 1.Laboratory of Organic Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Department of ChemistryUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.All Russian Institute for Medicinal and Aromatic PlantsMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Faculty of BiosciencesUniversity of JoensuuJoensuuFinland
  4. 4.School of Biological Sciences, Royal HollowayUniversity of LondonEgham, SurreyUK
  5. 5.Section of Ecology, Department of BiologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations