Advertisement

Transition Studies Review

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 725–736 | Cite as

Impact of CO2 Emissions Reductions on Firms’ Finance in an Emerging Economy: The Case of the Czech Republic

  • Tomáš BrzobohatýEmail author
  • Petr Janský
World Transition Economy Research

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between economic and environmental performance with focus on firms in an emerging economy, the Czech Republic, and their CO2 emission reductions. We discuss whether the hypotheses tested for local pollutants that firms emit and firms’ finances are relevant for CO2 emissions. We test the hypotheses on a sample of Czech firms included in the first phase of European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). We observe that introduction of EU ETS did not encourage significant investments in CO2 emissions reduction. Importantly, the results show that the firms that did invest in CO2 reductions experienced a negative impact on their finance. We argue that this is explained by the drop in the price of allowances on the carbon market in 2006 which resulted in firms receiving less revenue from saved allowances than they had expected.

Keywords

CO2 emissions reductions Firms Finance European Union Emissions Trading Scheme Czech Republic 

JEL Classification

Q5 G3 P3 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Milan Ščasný and Jan Brůha for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. We are also grateful to the Centre for the Environment of the Charles University in Prague for the access to the dataset. The authors acknowledge the support by the Institutional Research Framework 2005–2010, MSM0021620841 of Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Ang BW, Pandiyan G (1997) Decomposition of energy-induced CO2 emissions in manufacturing. Energy Econ 19:363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bovenberg AL, Goulder LH, Gourney DJ (2003) Efficiency Costs of Meeting Industry-Distributional Constraints under Environmental Permits and Taxes. NBER Working Paper W10059Google Scholar
  3. Dean A, Hoeller P (1992) Costs of reducing CO2 emissions: evidence from six global models. OECD Economic Department Working Papers No. 122Google Scholar
  4. Earnhart D, Lizal L (2002) Effects of ownership and financial status on corporate environmental performance. William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 492Google Scholar
  5. Earnhart D, Lizal L (2007) Does better environmental performance affect revenues, cost, or both? Evidence from a transition economy. William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 856Google Scholar
  6. Ellerman D, Buchner B (2007) The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: origins, allocation, and early results. Rev Environ Econ Policy 1:66–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feldman SJ, Soyka PA, Ameer P (1996) Does improving a firm’s environmental management system and environmental performance reset in a higher stock price? ICF Kaiser International 1996, IncGoogle Scholar
  8. Frosch RA, Gallopoulos NE (1989) Strategies for manufacturing. Sci Am 261(3):144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goulder LH, Parry IWH (2008) Instrument choice in environmental policy. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2:152–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hart SL, Ahuja G (1996) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between pollution prevention and firm performance. Bus Strategy Environ 5:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kettner C, Köppl A, Schleicher SP, Thenius G (2007) Stringency and Distribution in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme—the 2005 Evidence. FEEM Working Paper No. 22 2007Google Scholar
  12. Liaskas K, Mavrotas G, Mandaraka M, Diakoulaki D (2000) Decomposition of industrial CO2 emissions: the case of European Union. Energy Econ 22:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. OECD (2007) Business and the Environment. Policy Incentives and Corporate Responses. OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  14. Rennings K, Schröder M, Ziegler A (2003) The Economic Performance of European Stock Corporations. Does sustainability matter? Greener Management InternationalGoogle Scholar
  15. Rooney C (1993) Economics of pollution prevention: How waste reduction pays? Pollut Prev Rev: 261–276Google Scholar
  16. Schmidheiny S (1992) Changing Course. A Global Business Perspective on Development and Environment. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  17. White A et al (1993) Environmentally smart accounting: using total costs assessment to advance pollution prevention. Pollut Prev Rev: 247–259Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationGoethe University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social SciencesCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations