Advertisement

Transition Studies Review

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 573–587 | Cite as

Transition and Foreign Aid Policies in the Visegrád Countries: A Path Dependant Approach

  • Balázs Szent-Iványi
  • András Tétényi
Structural Reforms and Public Choices

Abstract

The paper argues that the current emerging international development policies of the Visegrád (V4) countries are heavily influenced by the certain aspects of the Communist past and the transition process. Due to these influences, the V4 countries have difficulties in adapting the foreign aid practices of Western donors and this leads to the emergence of a unique Central and Eastern European development cooperation model. As an analytical background, the paper builds on the path dependency theory of transition. A certain degree of path dependence is clearly visible in V4 foreign aid policies, and the paper analyses some aspects of this phenomenon: how these new emerging foreign aid donors select their partner countries, how much they spend on aid, how they formulate their aid delivery policies and institutions and what role the non-state actors play. The main conclusions of the paper are that the legacies of the Communist past have a clear influence and the V4 countries still have a long way to go in adapting their aid policies to international requirements.

Keywords

Emerging aid donors Visegrád countries Foreign aid Path dependency 

JEL Classification

F35 P33 

References

  1. Adamcová N et al (2006) International Development Cooperation of the Czech Republic. Institute of International Relations for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic, PragueGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina A, Dollar D (2000) Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? J Econ Growth 5(1):33–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baginski P (2002) Poland. In: Dauderstadt M (ed) EU Eastern enlargement and development cooperation. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, BonnGoogle Scholar
  4. Balázs P (2003) Az Európai Unió külpolitikája és a magyar-EU kapcsolatok fejlődése (The Foreign Policy of the European Union and the development of the Hungarian-EU Relations). KJK-Kerszöv, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  5. Berthélemy JC, Tichit A (2002) Bilateral donors’ aid allocation decisions. A three-dimensional panel analysis. UNU Wider Discussion Paper No. 2002/123Google Scholar
  6. Collier P, Dollar D (2002) Aid allocation and poverty reduction. Eur Econ Rev 46(3):1475–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Concord (2007) Hold the applause! EU Governments Risk Breaking Aid Promises. http://www.concordeurope.org/Files/media/internetdocumentsENG/Aid%20watch/1-Hold_the_Applause.FINAL.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2007
  8. Concord (2008) No time to waste: European governments behind schedule on aid quantity and quality. http://www.bond.org.uk/pubs/aid/AidWatch/AidWatch2008.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2008
  9. Csaba L (2003) Transformation as a subject of economic theory. In: Bönker F, Müller K, Pickel A (eds) Postcommunist transformation and social sciences: cross-disciplinary approaches. Rowman & Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  10. Degnbol-Martinussen J, Engberg-Pedersen P (2005) Aid: understanding international development cooperation. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Development Co-operation Poland (2007) Annual report 2006. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  12. Eurobarometer (2005) Attitudes towards development aid. Special Eurobarometer 222. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  13. Fidrmuc J, Fidrmuc J, Horvath J (2002) Visegrad economies: growth experience and prospects. Prepared for the GDN Global Research Project: Determinants of Economic GrowthGoogle Scholar
  14. Greskovits B (2003) The path-dependence of transitology. In: Bönker F, Müller K, Pickel A (eds) Postcommunist transformation and social sciences: cross-disciplinary approaches. Rowman & Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  15. HUN-IDA (2004) A magyar műszaki-tudományos együttműködés és segítségnyújtás négy évtizedének rövid áttekintése napjainkig (An overview of the four decades of Hungarian technical-scientific cooperation and assistance). Prepared by the Hungarian International Development Agency for the Hungarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiss J (2007) A Magyar nemzetközi fejlesztéspolitika a számok tükrében (Hungarian International Development Policy in Numbers). HAND, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Czech Republic (2001) The concept of the Czech Republic foreign aid program for the 2002–2007 period. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, PragueGoogle Scholar
  18. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Hungary (2007) A new EU donor country: Hungarian International Development Policy. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  19. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland (2003) Strategy for Poland’s development co-operation. Adopted by the Council of Ministers on 21st October 2003. WarsawGoogle Scholar
  20. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland (2007) Polish aid programme administered by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland. WarsawGoogle Scholar
  21. North DC (1997) The contribution of the new institutional economics to an understanding of the transition problem. WIDER Annual Lecture. http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/annual-lectures/en_GB/AL1/. Accessed 15 March 2008
  22. North DC (2005) Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  23. OECD (2005) Development co-operation report, statistical annex 2004. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. OECD (2006) Development co-operation report, statistical annex 2005. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. OECD (2007a) Development co-operation report, statistical annex 2006. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. OECD (2007b) Development cooperation of the Czech Republic DAC special review. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  27. Rajan R, Subramanian A (2005) What undermines aid’s impact on growth? IMF Working Paper 05/126Google Scholar
  28. Regulska J (1999) NGOs and their vulnerabilities during the time of transition: the case of Poland. Voluntas 10(1):61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sachs J (1993) Life in the economic emergency room. In: Williamson J (ed) The political economy of policy reform. Institute for International Economics, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  30. SlovakAid (2006) National programme of the official development assistance. SlovakAid, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  31. Stark D, Bruszt L (1998) Postsocialist pathways. transforming politics and property in east central Europe. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Szent-Iványi B (2007) State fragility and international development co-operation. UNU-WIDER Research Paper 2007/29Google Scholar
  33. Vári S (2007) A nemzetközi fejlesztési együttműködés a közvélemény tükrében (International Development Co-operation and Public Opinion). Társadalomkutatás 25(1):87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Williamson J (1993) Democracy and the “Washington Consensus”. World Dev 21(8):1329–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of World EconomyCorvinus University BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations